竞争对手还是表亲?研究分布式编程语言SystemJ和IEC61499之间的相似之处

R. Sinha, V. Vyatkin, Z. Salcic, Heejong Park
{"title":"竞争对手还是表亲?研究分布式编程语言SystemJ和IEC61499之间的相似之处","authors":"R. Sinha, V. Vyatkin, Z. Salcic, Heejong Park","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We face a glut of languages for programming distributed software today. However, only a few languages have proven their potential with wider practical use in different domains of computing. We picked two such languages, meant for different domains, to see if they could cross-pollinate and enrich one another. Specifically, we chose SystemJ, a language to program distributed embedded systems, and IEC61499, the next generation standard for distributed industrial automation control software. Unsurprisingly, we found similar structures and artifacts between the two. We also found significant differences mainly due to differing domain-specific requirements. This comparison leads to observations and guidelines for improving both languages, and we discuss directions towards an “ideal” distributed software programming language.","PeriodicalId":20477,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitors or Cousins? Studying the parallels between distributed programming languages SystemJ and IEC61499\",\"authors\":\"R. Sinha, V. Vyatkin, Z. Salcic, Heejong Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We face a glut of languages for programming distributed software today. However, only a few languages have proven their potential with wider practical use in different domains of computing. We picked two such languages, meant for different domains, to see if they could cross-pollinate and enrich one another. Specifically, we chose SystemJ, a language to program distributed embedded systems, and IEC61499, the next generation standard for distributed industrial automation control software. Unsurprisingly, we found similar structures and artifacts between the two. We also found significant differences mainly due to differing domain-specific requirements. This comparison leads to observations and guidelines for improving both languages, and we discuss directions towards an “ideal” distributed software programming language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2014.7005073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

今天,我们面临着大量用于编写分布式软件的语言。然而,只有少数语言证明了它们在不同计算领域更广泛实际应用的潜力。我们选择了两种这样的语言,分别用于不同的领域,看看它们是否能相互交流和丰富。具体来说,我们选择了SystemJ(一种用于编写分布式嵌入式系统的语言)和IEC61499(分布式工业自动化控制软件的下一代标准)。不出所料,我们在两者之间发现了相似的结构和文物。我们还发现了显著的差异,主要是由于不同的领域特定需求。这种比较引出了改进这两种语言的观察结果和指导方针,我们讨论了“理想的”分布式软件编程语言的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitors or Cousins? Studying the parallels between distributed programming languages SystemJ and IEC61499
We face a glut of languages for programming distributed software today. However, only a few languages have proven their potential with wider practical use in different domains of computing. We picked two such languages, meant for different domains, to see if they could cross-pollinate and enrich one another. Specifically, we chose SystemJ, a language to program distributed embedded systems, and IEC61499, the next generation standard for distributed industrial automation control software. Unsurprisingly, we found similar structures and artifacts between the two. We also found significant differences mainly due to differing domain-specific requirements. This comparison leads to observations and guidelines for improving both languages, and we discuss directions towards an “ideal” distributed software programming language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信