亨利·詹姆斯《死亡祭坛》中的忏悔与皈依

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 LITERATURE
Ann W. Astell
{"title":"亨利·詹姆斯《死亡祭坛》中的忏悔与皈依","authors":"Ann W. Astell","doi":"10.1353/rel.2021.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In \"The Altar of the Dead\" (1895), the compunction of Henry James's hero, George Stransom, is a grace of conversion (in Girardian terms, of \"novelistic conversion\") with real-life consequences for James himself, a writer then still locked in an obsessive, mimetic relationship with Oscar Wilde (1854−1900), his chief authorial rival. The ever ambivalent relationship between James and Wilde has been noted and traced in many of their respective writings, but \"The Altar of the Dead\" has been neglected in this regard, due to the uncanny tale's putative memorial connection to James's friend, the writer Constance Fenimore Woolson (1840–1894). Taken alone, however, that connection cannot account for elements in the tale that surprised James himself, ranging outside of his narrative control. Composed in the autumn of 1894 and published in 1895, the year of James's public humiliation as a playwright and of Wilde's imprisonment, the tale marks a definite turning point both in James's authorial career and in his personal relationships. Interpreted within the biographical context of its composition, James's tale of fraternal strife, jealousy, and religious cult exemplifies key elements in René Girard's mimetic theory. Through its evocation of the ancient doctrine of compunction, \"The Altar of the Dead\" also helps to fill a lacuna in Girard's work, which under-theorizes the work of grace. Unlike James's other ghostly stories, \"The Altar of the Dead\" remembers a moral miracle and a saintly intervention from beyond the grave amid a mimetic crisis that was more than fictional for Henry James.","PeriodicalId":43443,"journal":{"name":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","volume":"25 1","pages":"121 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compunction and Conversion in Henry James's \\\"The Altar of the Dead\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Ann W. Astell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rel.2021.0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In \\\"The Altar of the Dead\\\" (1895), the compunction of Henry James's hero, George Stransom, is a grace of conversion (in Girardian terms, of \\\"novelistic conversion\\\") with real-life consequences for James himself, a writer then still locked in an obsessive, mimetic relationship with Oscar Wilde (1854−1900), his chief authorial rival. The ever ambivalent relationship between James and Wilde has been noted and traced in many of their respective writings, but \\\"The Altar of the Dead\\\" has been neglected in this regard, due to the uncanny tale's putative memorial connection to James's friend, the writer Constance Fenimore Woolson (1840–1894). Taken alone, however, that connection cannot account for elements in the tale that surprised James himself, ranging outside of his narrative control. Composed in the autumn of 1894 and published in 1895, the year of James's public humiliation as a playwright and of Wilde's imprisonment, the tale marks a definite turning point both in James's authorial career and in his personal relationships. Interpreted within the biographical context of its composition, James's tale of fraternal strife, jealousy, and religious cult exemplifies key elements in René Girard's mimetic theory. Through its evocation of the ancient doctrine of compunction, \\\"The Altar of the Dead\\\" also helps to fill a lacuna in Girard's work, which under-theorizes the work of grace. Unlike James's other ghostly stories, \\\"The Altar of the Dead\\\" remembers a moral miracle and a saintly intervention from beyond the grave amid a mimetic crisis that was more than fictional for Henry James.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RELIGION & LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RELIGION & LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rel.2021.0035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rel.2021.0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在亨利·詹姆斯的小说《死亡的祭坛》(1895)中,主人公乔治·斯特兰索姆的忏悔是一种转变的优雅(用吉拉尔的术语来说,是一种“小说的转变”),对詹姆斯本人产生了现实的影响,而詹姆斯本人当时还沉浸在对其主要写作对手奥斯卡·王尔德(1854 - 1900)的迷恋和模仿中。詹姆斯和王尔德之间的矛盾关系在他们各自的许多作品中都得到了注意和追踪,但《死亡的祭坛》在这方面却被忽视了,因为这个神秘的故事被认为是与詹姆斯的朋友、作家康斯坦斯·费尼莫尔·伍尔森(1840-1894)有关。然而,单独来看,这种联系并不能解释故事中让詹姆斯自己感到惊讶的元素,这些元素超出了他的叙述控制范围。这个故事创作于1894年秋,出版于1895年,这一年,詹姆斯作为剧作家被公开羞辱,王尔德也被监禁,这个故事标志着詹姆斯的写作生涯和个人关系的一个明确的转折点。在其作品的传记背景下解读,詹姆斯的兄弟之争、嫉妒和宗教崇拜的故事体现了雷诺·吉拉德模仿理论的关键要素。通过对古代忏悔教义的唤起,《死亡的祭坛》也有助于填补吉拉德作品中的一个空白,即对恩典工作的理论化不足。与詹姆斯的其他鬼故事不同,《死亡的祭坛》讲述了一个道德奇迹,以及在一场模拟危机中来自坟墓之外的神圣干预,这对亨利·詹姆斯来说不仅仅是虚构的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compunction and Conversion in Henry James's "The Altar of the Dead"
ABSTRACT:In "The Altar of the Dead" (1895), the compunction of Henry James's hero, George Stransom, is a grace of conversion (in Girardian terms, of "novelistic conversion") with real-life consequences for James himself, a writer then still locked in an obsessive, mimetic relationship with Oscar Wilde (1854−1900), his chief authorial rival. The ever ambivalent relationship between James and Wilde has been noted and traced in many of their respective writings, but "The Altar of the Dead" has been neglected in this regard, due to the uncanny tale's putative memorial connection to James's friend, the writer Constance Fenimore Woolson (1840–1894). Taken alone, however, that connection cannot account for elements in the tale that surprised James himself, ranging outside of his narrative control. Composed in the autumn of 1894 and published in 1895, the year of James's public humiliation as a playwright and of Wilde's imprisonment, the tale marks a definite turning point both in James's authorial career and in his personal relationships. Interpreted within the biographical context of its composition, James's tale of fraternal strife, jealousy, and religious cult exemplifies key elements in René Girard's mimetic theory. Through its evocation of the ancient doctrine of compunction, "The Altar of the Dead" also helps to fill a lacuna in Girard's work, which under-theorizes the work of grace. Unlike James's other ghostly stories, "The Altar of the Dead" remembers a moral miracle and a saintly intervention from beyond the grave amid a mimetic crisis that was more than fictional for Henry James.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信