{"title":"摘要LB-161: ASCO和ESMO框架在TTFields治疗间皮瘤中的应用","authors":"J. Kelly, U. Weinberg, C. Proescholdt","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the clinical value of tumor treating fields (TTFields) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) by means of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Background: The potential effectiveness and safety of TTFields in addition to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin in MPM was recently shown by the analysis of the Phase II single arm EF-23 STELLAR trial. To account for the need of physicians and policymakers to objectively and comparably capture the clinical value of new cancer treatments the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) have both developed assessment frameworks. We quantified the clinical value of the TTFields treatment in MPM by applying ASCO and ESMO frameworks to the comparison of the STELLAR data to historical controls. Materials/Methods: The EF-23 STELLAR Trial (n=80) demonstrated that adding TTFields to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients resulted in overall survival of 18.2 months (95% CI 12.1-25.8) and progression free survival of 7.6 months (95% CI 6.7-8.6). The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) and the ASCO Net Health Benefit (NHB) frameworks were applied to the EF-23 trial data using a historical control as comparator. Results: The application of the ASCO framework to the EF-23 data resulted in a NHB score of 52. This result was at the higher end of the score range of novel cancer treatments and compares well to the results for nivolumab in advanced non-squamous NSCLC and advanced squamous NSCLC as reference points. Applying the ESMO framework resulted in MCBS scores of A/5 (adjuvant/advanced) which would be the first score reported for MPM. The MCBS scores of A/5 are the highest scores achievable in the ESMO framework, and higher then the ESMO MCBS scores reported in the literature for NSCLC treatments. Conclusions: Despite differences in their respective concepts, both the ASCO and ESMO frameworks suggest that adding TTFields to Pemetrexed and Cisplatin or Carboplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients may provide a significant clinical benefit. The high scores underline the fact that treatment with TTFields may extended progression free and overall survival without additional systemic toxicities. Citation Format: Justin Kelly, Uri Weinberg, Christina Proescholdt. Application of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks to TTFields treatment of mesothelioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-161.","PeriodicalId":21579,"journal":{"name":"Science and Health Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract LB-161: Application of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks to TTFields treatment of mesothelioma\",\"authors\":\"J. Kelly, U. Weinberg, C. Proescholdt\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the clinical value of tumor treating fields (TTFields) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) by means of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Background: The potential effectiveness and safety of TTFields in addition to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin in MPM was recently shown by the analysis of the Phase II single arm EF-23 STELLAR trial. To account for the need of physicians and policymakers to objectively and comparably capture the clinical value of new cancer treatments the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) have both developed assessment frameworks. We quantified the clinical value of the TTFields treatment in MPM by applying ASCO and ESMO frameworks to the comparison of the STELLAR data to historical controls. Materials/Methods: The EF-23 STELLAR Trial (n=80) demonstrated that adding TTFields to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients resulted in overall survival of 18.2 months (95% CI 12.1-25.8) and progression free survival of 7.6 months (95% CI 6.7-8.6). The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) and the ASCO Net Health Benefit (NHB) frameworks were applied to the EF-23 trial data using a historical control as comparator. Results: The application of the ASCO framework to the EF-23 data resulted in a NHB score of 52. This result was at the higher end of the score range of novel cancer treatments and compares well to the results for nivolumab in advanced non-squamous NSCLC and advanced squamous NSCLC as reference points. Applying the ESMO framework resulted in MCBS scores of A/5 (adjuvant/advanced) which would be the first score reported for MPM. The MCBS scores of A/5 are the highest scores achievable in the ESMO framework, and higher then the ESMO MCBS scores reported in the literature for NSCLC treatments. Conclusions: Despite differences in their respective concepts, both the ASCO and ESMO frameworks suggest that adding TTFields to Pemetrexed and Cisplatin or Carboplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients may provide a significant clinical benefit. The high scores underline the fact that treatment with TTFields may extended progression free and overall survival without additional systemic toxicities. Citation Format: Justin Kelly, Uri Weinberg, Christina Proescholdt. Application of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks to TTFields treatment of mesothelioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-161.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-LB-161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价肿瘤治疗野(TTFields)在恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)中的应用价值。背景:最近一项II期单臂EF-23 STELLAR试验的分析显示,除了培美曲塞、顺铂或卡铂外,TTFields治疗MPM的潜在有效性和安全性。考虑到医生和政策制定者需要客观和可比较地捕捉新的癌症治疗的临床价值,美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤医学学会(ESMO)都制定了评估框架。我们通过应用ASCO和ESMO框架将恒星数据与历史对照进行比较,量化了TTFields治疗MPM的临床价值。材料/方法:EF-23 STELLAR试验(n=80)表明,将TTFields加入培美曲塞和顺铂或卡铂治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者,总生存期为18.2个月(95% CI 12.1-25.8),无进展生存期为7.6个月(95% CI 6.7-8.6)。ESMO临床获益量表(MCBS)和ASCO净健康获益(NHB)框架应用于EF-23试验数据,使用历史对照作为比较。结果:将ASCO框架应用于EF-23数据,NHB得分为52分。该结果处于新型癌症治疗评分范围的高端,并且与nivolumab在晚期非鳞状NSCLC和晚期鳞状NSCLC中的结果作为参考点进行比较。应用ESMO框架的结果是MCBS评分为A/5(辅助/进展),这将是MPM报告的第一个评分。A/5的MCBS评分是ESMO框架中可达到的最高分,高于文献中报道的NSCLC治疗的ESMO MCBS评分。结论:尽管各自的概念存在差异,ASCO和ESMO框架都表明,在培美曲塞、顺铂或卡铂的基础上添加TTFields治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者可能会带来显著的临床获益。高分强调了这样一个事实,即TTFields治疗可以延长无进展和总体生存期,而没有额外的全身毒性。引用格式:Justin Kelly, Uri Weinberg, Christina Proescholdt。ASCO和ESMO框架在TTFields治疗间皮瘤中的应用[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):摘要nr LB-161。
Abstract LB-161: Application of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks to TTFields treatment of mesothelioma
Objective: To assess the clinical value of tumor treating fields (TTFields) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) by means of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Background: The potential effectiveness and safety of TTFields in addition to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin in MPM was recently shown by the analysis of the Phase II single arm EF-23 STELLAR trial. To account for the need of physicians and policymakers to objectively and comparably capture the clinical value of new cancer treatments the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) have both developed assessment frameworks. We quantified the clinical value of the TTFields treatment in MPM by applying ASCO and ESMO frameworks to the comparison of the STELLAR data to historical controls. Materials/Methods: The EF-23 STELLAR Trial (n=80) demonstrated that adding TTFields to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients resulted in overall survival of 18.2 months (95% CI 12.1-25.8) and progression free survival of 7.6 months (95% CI 6.7-8.6). The ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) and the ASCO Net Health Benefit (NHB) frameworks were applied to the EF-23 trial data using a historical control as comparator. Results: The application of the ASCO framework to the EF-23 data resulted in a NHB score of 52. This result was at the higher end of the score range of novel cancer treatments and compares well to the results for nivolumab in advanced non-squamous NSCLC and advanced squamous NSCLC as reference points. Applying the ESMO framework resulted in MCBS scores of A/5 (adjuvant/advanced) which would be the first score reported for MPM. The MCBS scores of A/5 are the highest scores achievable in the ESMO framework, and higher then the ESMO MCBS scores reported in the literature for NSCLC treatments. Conclusions: Despite differences in their respective concepts, both the ASCO and ESMO frameworks suggest that adding TTFields to Pemetrexed and Cisplatin or Carboplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients may provide a significant clinical benefit. The high scores underline the fact that treatment with TTFields may extended progression free and overall survival without additional systemic toxicities. Citation Format: Justin Kelly, Uri Weinberg, Christina Proescholdt. Application of the ASCO and ESMO frameworks to TTFields treatment of mesothelioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-161.