Xen项目代码审查过程的特征描述:经验报告

Daniel Izquierdo-Cortazar, Lars Kurth, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona, Santiago Dueñas, Nelson Sekitoleko
{"title":"Xen项目代码审查过程的特征描述:经验报告","authors":"Daniel Izquierdo-Cortazar, Lars Kurth, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona, Santiago Dueñas, Nelson Sekitoleko","doi":"10.1145/2901739.2901778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many software development projects have introduced manda-tory code review for every change to the code. This meansthat the project needs to devote a significant effort to re-view all proposed changes, and that their merging into thecode base may get considerably delayed. Therefore, all thoseprojects need to understand how code review is working, andthe delays it is causing in time to merge.This is the case in the Xen project, which performs peerreview using mailing lists. During the first half of 2015, somepeople in the project observed a large and sustained increasein the number of messages related to code review, which hadstarted some years before. This observation led to concernson whether the code review process was having some trouble,and too large an impact on the overall development process.Those concerns were addressed with a quantitative study,which is presented in this paper. Based on the informa-tion in code review messages, some metrics were defined toinfer delays imposed by code review. The study producedquantitative data suitable for informed discussion, which theproject is using to understand its code review process, andto take decisions to improve it.","PeriodicalId":6621,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"242 1","pages":"386-390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of the Xen Project Code Review Process: an Experience Report\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Izquierdo-Cortazar, Lars Kurth, Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona, Santiago Dueñas, Nelson Sekitoleko\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2901739.2901778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many software development projects have introduced manda-tory code review for every change to the code. This meansthat the project needs to devote a significant effort to re-view all proposed changes, and that their merging into thecode base may get considerably delayed. Therefore, all thoseprojects need to understand how code review is working, andthe delays it is causing in time to merge.This is the case in the Xen project, which performs peerreview using mailing lists. During the first half of 2015, somepeople in the project observed a large and sustained increasein the number of messages related to code review, which hadstarted some years before. This observation led to concernson whether the code review process was having some trouble,and too large an impact on the overall development process.Those concerns were addressed with a quantitative study,which is presented in this paper. Based on the informa-tion in code review messages, some metrics were defined toinfer delays imposed by code review. The study producedquantitative data suitable for informed discussion, which theproject is using to understand its code review process, andto take decisions to improve it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"386-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2901778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2901778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

许多软件开发项目对代码的每次更改都引入了强制性的代码审查。这意味着项目需要投入大量的精力来审查所有提议的变更,并且它们合并到代码库中可能会被大大延迟。因此,所有这些项目都需要了解代码审查是如何工作的,以及它在合并时造成的延迟。Xen项目就是这种情况,它使用邮件列表执行同行评审。在2015年上半年,项目中的一些人观察到与代码审查相关的消息数量出现了大量持续的增长,这种情况在几年前就开始了。这种观察导致了对代码审查过程是否有一些麻烦的关注,以及对整个开发过程的影响是否太大。这些问题已通过一项定量研究加以解决,该研究将在本文中提出。基于代码审查消息中的信息,定义了一些度量来推断代码审查所带来的延迟。该研究产生了适合于知情讨论的定量数据,该项目正在使用这些数据来理解其代码审查过程,并做出改进它的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of the Xen Project Code Review Process: an Experience Report
Many software development projects have introduced manda-tory code review for every change to the code. This meansthat the project needs to devote a significant effort to re-view all proposed changes, and that their merging into thecode base may get considerably delayed. Therefore, all thoseprojects need to understand how code review is working, andthe delays it is causing in time to merge.This is the case in the Xen project, which performs peerreview using mailing lists. During the first half of 2015, somepeople in the project observed a large and sustained increasein the number of messages related to code review, which hadstarted some years before. This observation led to concernson whether the code review process was having some trouble,and too large an impact on the overall development process.Those concerns were addressed with a quantitative study,which is presented in this paper. Based on the informa-tion in code review messages, some metrics were defined toinfer delays imposed by code review. The study producedquantitative data suitable for informed discussion, which theproject is using to understand its code review process, andto take decisions to improve it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信