自体椎体填充PEEK椎笼在前路椎间盘切除术及内固定融合中的临床疗效

A. Shuid, M. F. Mohd Miswan, Xue-bin Zhan, W. Yuan, Haifeng Yuan
{"title":"自体椎体填充PEEK椎笼在前路椎间盘切除术及内固定融合中的临床疗效","authors":"A. Shuid, M. F. Mohd Miswan, Xue-bin Zhan, W. Yuan, Haifeng Yuan","doi":"10.24191/jsst.v3i1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the autologous vertebral-filled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with instrumentation (ACDFI). The clinical data of 368 patients who received ACDFI from September 2012 to September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the material that filled PEEK cage during the surgery, the patients were divided into two groups, the autologous vertebrate group (n equal to 185) and the autologous iliac group (n equal to 183). The operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative complications in the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The bone graft fusion and postoperative functional outcomes, including scores of modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were compared. Patients were followed-up for 14.04 ± 0.98 months. At 6-months follow-up, the rate of spinal fusion was 96.29% (178/185) in the vertebral group and 95.94% (176/183) in the iliac group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The postoperative VAS, mJOA, and NDI scores were also not significantly different between two groups during the follow-up (p > 0.05). The operative time and blood loss in the vertebral group were significantly less than that of the iliac group (p < 0.01). All patients in the iliac group suffered pain at the iliac donor site, 65 patients suffered numbness, 12 patients had fat liquefaction at donor incision. Meanwhile, all the patients in the vertebral group had no postoperative complications. This study concluded that the autologous vertebrae-filled PEEK cage could achieve the same clinical outcome as the autologous iliac, but have the advantages of shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.","PeriodicalId":17117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smart Science and Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Autogenous Vertebrae-Filled PEEK Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Instrumentation\",\"authors\":\"A. Shuid, M. F. Mohd Miswan, Xue-bin Zhan, W. Yuan, Haifeng Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/jsst.v3i1.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the autologous vertebral-filled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with instrumentation (ACDFI). The clinical data of 368 patients who received ACDFI from September 2012 to September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the material that filled PEEK cage during the surgery, the patients were divided into two groups, the autologous vertebrate group (n equal to 185) and the autologous iliac group (n equal to 183). The operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative complications in the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The bone graft fusion and postoperative functional outcomes, including scores of modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were compared. Patients were followed-up for 14.04 ± 0.98 months. At 6-months follow-up, the rate of spinal fusion was 96.29% (178/185) in the vertebral group and 95.94% (176/183) in the iliac group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The postoperative VAS, mJOA, and NDI scores were also not significantly different between two groups during the follow-up (p > 0.05). The operative time and blood loss in the vertebral group were significantly less than that of the iliac group (p < 0.01). All patients in the iliac group suffered pain at the iliac donor site, 65 patients suffered numbness, 12 patients had fat liquefaction at donor incision. Meanwhile, all the patients in the vertebral group had no postoperative complications. This study concluded that the autologous vertebrae-filled PEEK cage could achieve the same clinical outcome as the autologous iliac, but have the advantages of shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smart Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smart Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/jsst.v3i1.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smart Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/jsst.v3i1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨自体椎体填充聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼在颈前路椎间盘切除术和内固定融合(ACDFI)中的临床疗效。回顾性分析2012年9月至2017年9月接受ACDFI治疗的368例患者的临床资料。根据术中填充PEEK笼的材料,将患者分为两组,自体脊椎动物组(n = 185)和自体髂骨组(n = 183)。记录分析两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、术后并发症。比较植骨融合和术后功能结果,包括改良日本骨科协会评分(mJOA)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。随访14.04±0.98个月。随访6个月,椎体组和髂骨组脊柱融合率分别为96.29%(178/185)和95.94%(176/183),两组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组患者术后VAS评分、mJOA评分、NDI评分均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。椎体组手术时间和出血量明显少于髂组(p < 0.01)。髂组所有患者均出现髂供区疼痛,65例患者出现麻木,12例患者出现供区切口脂肪液化。同时,椎体组患者均无术后并发症发生。本研究认为,自体椎体填充PEEK cage可以达到与自体髂骨相同的临床效果,但具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后并发症少的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Autogenous Vertebrae-Filled PEEK Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Instrumentation
This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the autologous vertebral-filled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with instrumentation (ACDFI). The clinical data of 368 patients who received ACDFI from September 2012 to September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the material that filled PEEK cage during the surgery, the patients were divided into two groups, the autologous vertebrate group (n equal to 185) and the autologous iliac group (n equal to 183). The operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative complications in the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The bone graft fusion and postoperative functional outcomes, including scores of modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were compared. Patients were followed-up for 14.04 ± 0.98 months. At 6-months follow-up, the rate of spinal fusion was 96.29% (178/185) in the vertebral group and 95.94% (176/183) in the iliac group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The postoperative VAS, mJOA, and NDI scores were also not significantly different between two groups during the follow-up (p > 0.05). The operative time and blood loss in the vertebral group were significantly less than that of the iliac group (p < 0.01). All patients in the iliac group suffered pain at the iliac donor site, 65 patients suffered numbness, 12 patients had fat liquefaction at donor incision. Meanwhile, all the patients in the vertebral group had no postoperative complications. This study concluded that the autologous vertebrae-filled PEEK cage could achieve the same clinical outcome as the autologous iliac, but have the advantages of shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信