Richard Manning, I. Goldman, Gonzalo Hernández Licona
{"title":"影响评价和综合——它们在低收入和中等收入国家的应用程度如何?","authors":"Richard Manning, I. Goldman, Gonzalo Hernández Licona","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2022.2102056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examine how Impact Evaluation (IE) and associated syntheses contribute to evidence generation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. We interviewed over 50 individuals from relevant organisations and five LMIC countries and drew on data from reports and repositories. The number of development-oriented IEs has shown sustained growth, but tracking of use is too often weak. We conclude that there has been progress , including more flexible products, but that impact could be improved. IEs are an important part of a wider evidence ecosystem, and their evidence needs to be better used (and tracked). Good practice should be promoted more systematically.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"21 1","pages":"148 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact evaluation and synthesis – how far are they being used in low- and middle-income countries?\",\"authors\":\"Richard Manning, I. Goldman, Gonzalo Hernández Licona\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439342.2022.2102056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We examine how Impact Evaluation (IE) and associated syntheses contribute to evidence generation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. We interviewed over 50 individuals from relevant organisations and five LMIC countries and drew on data from reports and repositories. The number of development-oriented IEs has shown sustained growth, but tracking of use is too often weak. We conclude that there has been progress , including more flexible products, but that impact could be improved. IEs are an important part of a wider evidence ecosystem, and their evidence needs to be better used (and tracked). Good practice should be promoted more systematically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2102056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2102056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact evaluation and synthesis – how far are they being used in low- and middle-income countries?
ABSTRACT We examine how Impact Evaluation (IE) and associated syntheses contribute to evidence generation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. We interviewed over 50 individuals from relevant organisations and five LMIC countries and drew on data from reports and repositories. The number of development-oriented IEs has shown sustained growth, but tracking of use is too often weak. We conclude that there has been progress , including more flexible products, but that impact could be improved. IEs are an important part of a wider evidence ecosystem, and their evidence needs to be better used (and tracked). Good practice should be promoted more systematically.