{"title":"重新评估老约瑟夫·博诺米:霍克斯穆尔奖论文2021","authors":"Rosanna Barraclough","doi":"10.1017/arh.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the early nineteenth century, Joseph Bonomi the Elder (1739–1808) was one of the best-known architects in Britain — so much so that he figured in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility (1811) — but his reputation subsequently declined and diminished to the extent that, in the current literature on British architecture of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, he is little more than a footnote. In a circular process, this excision directly contributed to the demolition of some of his most important work — above all, Rosneath House in Dunbartonshire — on the grounds that it was designed by an architect of little importance, which in turn makes it all the harder to recapture and appraise his architecture. The article explores both the reasons for the excision and the nature of Bonomi’s work. Drawing on the limited available evidence as well as hitherto unused construction drawings of Rosneath, the article repositions Bonomi as an Italian architect working in London — first for the Adam brothers and then on his own account — and examines the qualities of his designs and the factors that led to him being excluded from the inner circle of the artistic establishment, most notably the Royal Academy. In doing so, it sheds new light both on developments in neoclassicism in the period, specifically the ‘stripped down’ style that Bonomi espoused, and on the xenophobic and anti-Catholic currents in London at the time, which appear to have continued to influence his posthumous reputation.","PeriodicalId":43293,"journal":{"name":"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY","volume":"26 1","pages":"195 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing Joseph Bonomi the Elder: The Hawksmoor Prize Essay 2021\",\"authors\":\"Rosanna Barraclough\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/arh.2022.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the early nineteenth century, Joseph Bonomi the Elder (1739–1808) was one of the best-known architects in Britain — so much so that he figured in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility (1811) — but his reputation subsequently declined and diminished to the extent that, in the current literature on British architecture of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, he is little more than a footnote. In a circular process, this excision directly contributed to the demolition of some of his most important work — above all, Rosneath House in Dunbartonshire — on the grounds that it was designed by an architect of little importance, which in turn makes it all the harder to recapture and appraise his architecture. The article explores both the reasons for the excision and the nature of Bonomi’s work. Drawing on the limited available evidence as well as hitherto unused construction drawings of Rosneath, the article repositions Bonomi as an Italian architect working in London — first for the Adam brothers and then on his own account — and examines the qualities of his designs and the factors that led to him being excluded from the inner circle of the artistic establishment, most notably the Royal Academy. In doing so, it sheds new light both on developments in neoclassicism in the period, specifically the ‘stripped down’ style that Bonomi espoused, and on the xenophobic and anti-Catholic currents in London at the time, which appear to have continued to influence his posthumous reputation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"195 - 226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/arh.2022.10\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/arh.2022.10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
19世纪早期,老约瑟夫·博诺米(Joseph Bonomi the Elder, 1739-1808)是英国最著名的建筑师之一,以至于他出现在简·奥斯汀的《理智与情感》(1811)中,但他的名声随后下降,在18世纪末和19世纪初的英国建筑文献中,他只不过是一个脚注。在一个循环的过程中,这种切除直接导致了他的一些最重要的作品的拆除,首先是Dunbartonshire的Rosneath House,理由是它是由一个不太重要的建筑师设计的,这反过来又使得重新获得和评估他的建筑变得更加困难。本文探讨了博诺米作品被删减的原因和作品的性质。根据有限的可用证据以及迄今为止未使用的建筑图纸,文章将Bonomi重新定位为在伦敦工作的意大利建筑师-首先为亚当兄弟工作,然后以自己的名义工作-并检查了他的设计质量以及导致他被排除在艺术机构核心圈子之外的因素,尤其是皇家学院。在这样做的过程中,它揭示了新古典主义在这一时期的发展,特别是博诺米所支持的“剥离”风格,以及当时伦敦的仇外和反天主教潮流,这似乎继续影响着他死后的声誉。
Reassessing Joseph Bonomi the Elder: The Hawksmoor Prize Essay 2021
ABSTRACT In the early nineteenth century, Joseph Bonomi the Elder (1739–1808) was one of the best-known architects in Britain — so much so that he figured in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility (1811) — but his reputation subsequently declined and diminished to the extent that, in the current literature on British architecture of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, he is little more than a footnote. In a circular process, this excision directly contributed to the demolition of some of his most important work — above all, Rosneath House in Dunbartonshire — on the grounds that it was designed by an architect of little importance, which in turn makes it all the harder to recapture and appraise his architecture. The article explores both the reasons for the excision and the nature of Bonomi’s work. Drawing on the limited available evidence as well as hitherto unused construction drawings of Rosneath, the article repositions Bonomi as an Italian architect working in London — first for the Adam brothers and then on his own account — and examines the qualities of his designs and the factors that led to him being excluded from the inner circle of the artistic establishment, most notably the Royal Academy. In doing so, it sheds new light both on developments in neoclassicism in the period, specifically the ‘stripped down’ style that Bonomi espoused, and on the xenophobic and anti-Catholic currents in London at the time, which appear to have continued to influence his posthumous reputation.