外周动脉血运重建术后结果的性别差异:来自VOYAGER PAD的见解

Connie N. Hess, I. Baumgartner, Sonia S Anand, M. Nehler, M. Patel, E. S. Debus, M. Szarek, W. Capell, E. Muehlhofer, S. Berkowitz, L. Haskell, R. Bauersachs, M. Bonaca, Judith Hsia
{"title":"外周动脉血运重建术后结果的性别差异:来自VOYAGER PAD的见解","authors":"Connie N. Hess, I. Baumgartner, Sonia S Anand, M. Nehler, M. Patel, E. S. Debus, M. Szarek, W. Capell, E. Muehlhofer, S. Berkowitz, L. Haskell, R. Bauersachs, M. Bonaca, Judith Hsia","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.024655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite high female prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), little is known about sex‐based outcomes after lower extremity revascularization (LER) for symptomatic PAD. The effects of rivaroxaban according to sex following LER have not been fully reported. Methods and Results In VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease), low‐dose rivaroxaban versus placebo on a background of aspirin reduced the composite primary efficacy outcome of cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD undergoing LER. Unplanned index limb revascularization was prespecified and prospectively ascertained. The primary safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. Analyses of outcomes and treatment effects by sex were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 6564 randomly assigned patients followed for a median of 28 months, 1704 (26.0%) were women. Among patients administered placebo, women were at similar risk for the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; [95% CI, 0.74–1.09]; P=0.29) as men, while female sex was associated with a trend toward higher risk of unplanned index limb revascularization (HR, 1.18; [95% CI, 1.00–1.40]; P=0.0499). Irrespective of sex, effects of rivaroxaban were consistent for the primary efficacy outcome (P‐interaction=0.22), unplanned index limb revascularization (P‐interaction=0.64), and bleeding (P‐interaction=0.61). Women were more likely than men to discontinue study treatment (HR, 1.13; [95% CI, 1.03–1.25]; P=0.0099). Conclusions Among >1700 women with PAD undergoing LER, women and men were at similar risk for the primary outcome, but a trend for greater risk of unplanned index limb revascularization among women was observed. Effects of rivaroxaban were consistent by sex, though women more often discontinued treatment. Better understanding of sex‐based outcomes and treatment adherence following LER is needed. Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02504216.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex‐Based Differences in Outcomes Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization: Insights From VOYAGER PAD\",\"authors\":\"Connie N. Hess, I. Baumgartner, Sonia S Anand, M. Nehler, M. Patel, E. S. Debus, M. Szarek, W. Capell, E. Muehlhofer, S. Berkowitz, L. Haskell, R. Bauersachs, M. Bonaca, Judith Hsia\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.121.024655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite high female prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), little is known about sex‐based outcomes after lower extremity revascularization (LER) for symptomatic PAD. The effects of rivaroxaban according to sex following LER have not been fully reported. Methods and Results In VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease), low‐dose rivaroxaban versus placebo on a background of aspirin reduced the composite primary efficacy outcome of cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD undergoing LER. Unplanned index limb revascularization was prespecified and prospectively ascertained. The primary safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. Analyses of outcomes and treatment effects by sex were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 6564 randomly assigned patients followed for a median of 28 months, 1704 (26.0%) were women. Among patients administered placebo, women were at similar risk for the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; [95% CI, 0.74–1.09]; P=0.29) as men, while female sex was associated with a trend toward higher risk of unplanned index limb revascularization (HR, 1.18; [95% CI, 1.00–1.40]; P=0.0499). Irrespective of sex, effects of rivaroxaban were consistent for the primary efficacy outcome (P‐interaction=0.22), unplanned index limb revascularization (P‐interaction=0.64), and bleeding (P‐interaction=0.61). Women were more likely than men to discontinue study treatment (HR, 1.13; [95% CI, 1.03–1.25]; P=0.0099). Conclusions Among >1700 women with PAD undergoing LER, women and men were at similar risk for the primary outcome, but a trend for greater risk of unplanned index limb revascularization among women was observed. Effects of rivaroxaban were consistent by sex, though women more often discontinued treatment. Better understanding of sex‐based outcomes and treatment adherence following LER is needed. Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02504216.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:尽管女性外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患病率很高,但对有症状的PAD患者下肢血运重建术(LER)后基于性别的结局知之甚少。利伐沙班对LER后性别的影响尚未得到充分报道。方法和结果在VOYAGER PAD(血管结局研究ASA[乙酰水杨酸]联合利伐沙班进行外周动脉疾病的血管内或手术肢体血运重建术)中,低剂量利伐沙班与阿司匹林背景下的安慰剂相比,降低了接受LER治疗的PAD患者心血管和肢体事件的复合主要疗效。计划外的下肢血运重建术是预先确定和前瞻性确定的。主要的安全终点是心肌梗死大出血时的溶栓。采用Cox比例风险模型对结果和治疗效果进行性别分析。在6564名随机分配的患者中,随访时间中位数为28个月,其中1704名(26.0%)为女性。在服用安慰剂的患者中,女性在主要疗效结局方面的风险相似(风险比[HR], 0.90;[95% ci, 0.74-1.09];P=0.29),而女性与计划外下肢血运重建术的高风险趋势相关(HR, 1.18;[95% ci, 1.00-1.40];P = 0.0499)。不论性别,利伐沙班对主要疗效结局(P -相互作用=0.22)、计划外下肢血管重建(P -相互作用=0.64)和出血(P -相互作用=0.61)的影响是一致的。女性比男性更有可能停止研究治疗(HR, 1.13;[95% ci, 1.03-1.25];P = 0.0099)。结论:在bb17000名接受LER治疗的女性PAD患者中,女性和男性在主要结局方面的风险相似,但观察到女性发生计划外下肢血运重建术的风险更高。利伐沙班的效果在性别上是一致的,尽管女性更经常停止治疗。需要更好地了解LER后基于性别的结局和治疗依从性。注册网址:http://clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02504216。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex‐Based Differences in Outcomes Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization: Insights From VOYAGER PAD
Background Despite high female prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), little is known about sex‐based outcomes after lower extremity revascularization (LER) for symptomatic PAD. The effects of rivaroxaban according to sex following LER have not been fully reported. Methods and Results In VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease), low‐dose rivaroxaban versus placebo on a background of aspirin reduced the composite primary efficacy outcome of cardiovascular and limb events in patients with PAD undergoing LER. Unplanned index limb revascularization was prespecified and prospectively ascertained. The primary safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. Analyses of outcomes and treatment effects by sex were performed using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 6564 randomly assigned patients followed for a median of 28 months, 1704 (26.0%) were women. Among patients administered placebo, women were at similar risk for the primary efficacy outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; [95% CI, 0.74–1.09]; P=0.29) as men, while female sex was associated with a trend toward higher risk of unplanned index limb revascularization (HR, 1.18; [95% CI, 1.00–1.40]; P=0.0499). Irrespective of sex, effects of rivaroxaban were consistent for the primary efficacy outcome (P‐interaction=0.22), unplanned index limb revascularization (P‐interaction=0.64), and bleeding (P‐interaction=0.61). Women were more likely than men to discontinue study treatment (HR, 1.13; [95% CI, 1.03–1.25]; P=0.0099). Conclusions Among >1700 women with PAD undergoing LER, women and men were at similar risk for the primary outcome, but a trend for greater risk of unplanned index limb revascularization among women was observed. Effects of rivaroxaban were consistent by sex, though women more often discontinued treatment. Better understanding of sex‐based outcomes and treatment adherence following LER is needed. Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02504216.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信