公众和患者参与儿科研究

J. Bate, Neil Ranasinghe, R. Ling, J. Preston, R. Nightingale, S. Denegri
{"title":"公众和患者参与儿科研究","authors":"J. Bate, Neil Ranasinghe, R. Ling, J. Preston, R. Nightingale, S. Denegri","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2015-309500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health research is a dynamic partnership between patients and/or members of the public and researchers. Involvement is distinct from being subjects of research (participation) as patients contribute to the research process as advisors and sometimes co-researchers. In practice, this may mean involvement in prioritising and developing research ideas, contributing to study design, carrying out the research and research dissemination.1 It should be emphasised that involvement is carried out ‘with’ or ‘by’ members of the public rather than ‘to’, ‘about’ or ‘for’ them.2\n\nPPI offers researchers valuable and unique insight into the particular condition being investigated to make research more relevant to patients. PPI is needed to improve the quality of research and increase accountability. It is also reported to have benefits of increased recruitment and retention of study participants.3 The reasons for this are varied. The research questions are more likely to be aligned with outcomes valued by patients. Recruitment materials designed with the public will be written more suitably and with greater relevance. Importantly, the public bring important insight into how burdensome study requirements are to everyday life. Additionally, the idea of PPI is itself appealing, which increases willingness to participate in research.\n\nFor today's researchers, active PPI has further relevance as funding bodies frequently require evidence of PPI in the development of a research proposal and ask how patients and the public might be involved in the conduct of the research. For patients, it is ethical for them to have a voice in research that may have an impact on their health.\n\nDame Sally Davies, chief medical officer for England, advocates PPI as the rule rather than the exception:No matter how complicated the research, or how brilliant the researcher, patients and the public always offer unique, invaluable insights. …","PeriodicalId":8153,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","volume":"428 1","pages":"158 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public and patient involvement in paediatric research\",\"authors\":\"J. Bate, Neil Ranasinghe, R. Ling, J. Preston, R. Nightingale, S. Denegri\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2015-309500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health research is a dynamic partnership between patients and/or members of the public and researchers. Involvement is distinct from being subjects of research (participation) as patients contribute to the research process as advisors and sometimes co-researchers. In practice, this may mean involvement in prioritising and developing research ideas, contributing to study design, carrying out the research and research dissemination.1 It should be emphasised that involvement is carried out ‘with’ or ‘by’ members of the public rather than ‘to’, ‘about’ or ‘for’ them.2\\n\\nPPI offers researchers valuable and unique insight into the particular condition being investigated to make research more relevant to patients. PPI is needed to improve the quality of research and increase accountability. It is also reported to have benefits of increased recruitment and retention of study participants.3 The reasons for this are varied. The research questions are more likely to be aligned with outcomes valued by patients. Recruitment materials designed with the public will be written more suitably and with greater relevance. Importantly, the public bring important insight into how burdensome study requirements are to everyday life. Additionally, the idea of PPI is itself appealing, which increases willingness to participate in research.\\n\\nFor today's researchers, active PPI has further relevance as funding bodies frequently require evidence of PPI in the development of a research proposal and ask how patients and the public might be involved in the conduct of the research. For patients, it is ethical for them to have a voice in research that may have an impact on their health.\\n\\nDame Sally Davies, chief medical officer for England, advocates PPI as the rule rather than the exception:No matter how complicated the research, or how brilliant the researcher, patients and the public always offer unique, invaluable insights. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":8153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"volume\":\"428 1\",\"pages\":\"158 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education & Practice Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

公众和患者参与卫生研究是患者和/或公众成员与研究人员之间的一种动态伙伴关系。参与不同于作为研究的主体(参与),因为患者以顾问的身份参与研究过程,有时也参与研究。在实践中,这可能意味着参与研究思路的优先排序和发展,为研究设计做出贡献,开展研究和传播研究应该强调的是,公众的参与是“与”或“由”公众参与,而不是“向”、“关于”或“为”他们参与。2PPI为研究人员提供了宝贵而独特的见解,使研究与患者更相关。提高研究质量和加强问责制需要PPI。据报道,它也有增加招募和保留研究参与者的好处造成这种情况的原因是多方面的。研究问题更有可能与患者所看重的结果相一致。为公众设计的招聘材料会写得更合适,更有针对性。重要的是,公众对学习要求给日常生活带来的负担有了重要的认识。此外,PPI的想法本身就很吸引人,这增加了参与研究的意愿。对于今天的研究人员来说,活性PPI具有进一步的相关性,因为资助机构在制定研究计划时经常需要PPI的证据,并询问患者和公众如何参与研究的实施。对病人来说,在可能影响他们健康的研究中发表意见是合乎道德的。英国首席医疗官Dame Sally Davies提倡将PPI作为常规而不是例外:无论研究多么复杂,或者研究人员多么杰出,患者和公众总是提供独特的、宝贵的见解。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public and patient involvement in paediatric research
Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health research is a dynamic partnership between patients and/or members of the public and researchers. Involvement is distinct from being subjects of research (participation) as patients contribute to the research process as advisors and sometimes co-researchers. In practice, this may mean involvement in prioritising and developing research ideas, contributing to study design, carrying out the research and research dissemination.1 It should be emphasised that involvement is carried out ‘with’ or ‘by’ members of the public rather than ‘to’, ‘about’ or ‘for’ them.2 PPI offers researchers valuable and unique insight into the particular condition being investigated to make research more relevant to patients. PPI is needed to improve the quality of research and increase accountability. It is also reported to have benefits of increased recruitment and retention of study participants.3 The reasons for this are varied. The research questions are more likely to be aligned with outcomes valued by patients. Recruitment materials designed with the public will be written more suitably and with greater relevance. Importantly, the public bring important insight into how burdensome study requirements are to everyday life. Additionally, the idea of PPI is itself appealing, which increases willingness to participate in research. For today's researchers, active PPI has further relevance as funding bodies frequently require evidence of PPI in the development of a research proposal and ask how patients and the public might be involved in the conduct of the research. For patients, it is ethical for them to have a voice in research that may have an impact on their health. Dame Sally Davies, chief medical officer for England, advocates PPI as the rule rather than the exception:No matter how complicated the research, or how brilliant the researcher, patients and the public always offer unique, invaluable insights. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信