英国脱欧前后的议会主权

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.1515/icl-2021-0024

Alexander Orakhelashvili

{"title":"英国脱欧前后的议会主权","authors":"Alexander Orakhelashvili","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article assesses the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty against the background that, at the time of UK’s withdrawal from the EU, UK parliament proclaimed it to be preserved despite the continuing domestic legal effect accorded, under 2018 and 2020 Acts, to pertinent EU law provisions in the UK legal system. The relevant evidence is analysed to show whether that position is one to which English law subscribes.","PeriodicalId":41321,"journal":{"name":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parliamentary Sovereignty before and beyond Brexit\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Orakhelashvili\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/icl-2021-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article assesses the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty against the background that, at the time of UK’s withdrawal from the EU, UK parliament proclaimed it to be preserved despite the continuing domestic legal effect accorded, under 2018 and 2020 Acts, to pertinent EU law provisions in the UK legal system. The relevant evidence is analysed to show whether that position is one to which English law subscribes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对议会主权原则进行评估的背景是，在英国退出欧盟时，英国议会宣布保留该原则，尽管根据2018年和2020年法案，英国法律体系中的相关欧盟法律条款仍具有持续的国内法律效力。本文对相关证据进行了分析，以表明这一立场是否为英国法律所认同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Parliamentary Sovereignty before and beyond Brexit

Abstract This article assesses the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty against the background that, at the time of UK’s withdrawal from the EU, UK parliament proclaimed it to be preserved despite the continuing domestic legal effect accorded, under 2018 and 2020 Acts, to pertinent EU law provisions in the UK legal system. The relevant evidence is analysed to show whether that position is one to which English law subscribes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ICL Journal-Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law LAW-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量