编者简介:希望、关心、可能、疲惫

IF 0.2 Q3 Social Sciences
R. Steele, Juliane Schicker, Sabine Hirschauer, Zachary Fitzpatrick, Liz Ametsbichler, Mareike Herrmann, Miriam Schwarz, A. Bryant, Tiarra Cooper, C. Scott, Katharina Gerstenberger, Maureen O. Gallagher, R. Mcfarland, Simone Pfleger, A. L. Hill
{"title":"编者简介:希望、关心、可能、疲惫","authors":"R. Steele, Juliane Schicker, Sabine Hirschauer, Zachary Fitzpatrick, Liz Ametsbichler, Mareike Herrmann, Miriam Schwarz, A. Bryant, Tiarra Cooper, C. Scott, Katharina Gerstenberger, Maureen O. Gallagher, R. Mcfarland, Simone Pfleger, A. L. Hill","doi":"10.1353/fgs.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reads a protofeminist critique of the nineteenth-century gender binary in Charlotte von Stein's lesser-known play, Die zwey Emilien (1803). This dramatic, inventive adaptation of Sophia Lee's melodramatic English novel, The Two Emilys (1795), features two seemingly opposite women, who simultaneously are virtually the same, to demonstrate the lack of space for the woman as individual in Stein's contemporary society. These women are coded as opposites with sometimes humorous, satirical, and outrageous language: one Emilie is the \"innocent angel\" committing \"innocent deceit,\" the other a \"wicked creature\" and \"cunning snake\" practicing \"nefarious deceit.\" Ultimately, I argue that Stein calls into question the deceptive social construct of woman that forever attempts to keep her in her place. This play contributes to the ongoing conversation among female authors who resisted the oppressive demands of feminine virtues.","PeriodicalId":53717,"journal":{"name":"Feminist German Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"1 - 107 - 108 - 110 - 110 - 112 - 112 - 114 - 114 - 116 - 116 - 118 - 118 - 120 - 120 - 122 - 122 -"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors' Introduction: Hope, Care, Possibility, Exhaustion\",\"authors\":\"R. Steele, Juliane Schicker, Sabine Hirschauer, Zachary Fitzpatrick, Liz Ametsbichler, Mareike Herrmann, Miriam Schwarz, A. Bryant, Tiarra Cooper, C. Scott, Katharina Gerstenberger, Maureen O. Gallagher, R. Mcfarland, Simone Pfleger, A. L. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fgs.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article reads a protofeminist critique of the nineteenth-century gender binary in Charlotte von Stein's lesser-known play, Die zwey Emilien (1803). This dramatic, inventive adaptation of Sophia Lee's melodramatic English novel, The Two Emilys (1795), features two seemingly opposite women, who simultaneously are virtually the same, to demonstrate the lack of space for the woman as individual in Stein's contemporary society. These women are coded as opposites with sometimes humorous, satirical, and outrageous language: one Emilie is the \\\"innocent angel\\\" committing \\\"innocent deceit,\\\" the other a \\\"wicked creature\\\" and \\\"cunning snake\\\" practicing \\\"nefarious deceit.\\\" Ultimately, I argue that Stein calls into question the deceptive social construct of woman that forever attempts to keep her in her place. This play contributes to the ongoing conversation among female authors who resisted the oppressive demands of feminine virtues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist German Studies\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 107 - 108 - 110 - 110 - 112 - 112 - 114 - 114 - 116 - 116 - 118 - 118 - 120 - 120 - 122 - 122 -\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist German Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fgs.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist German Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fgs.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文解读了夏洛蒂·冯·施泰因(Charlotte von Stein)不太知名的戏剧《爱的一天》(Die zwey Emilien, 1803)中对19世纪二元性别的原始女性主义批判。这部戏剧性的、创造性的改编自索菲娅·李(Sophia Lee)的情节剧英国小说《两个艾米丽》(The Two Emilys, 1795),以两个看似对立的女性为主角,同时又几乎相同,以表明在斯坦的当代社会中,女性作为个体缺乏空间。这些女人有时用幽默、讽刺和令人发指的语言被编码为对立面:一个是“无辜的天使”,犯下了“无辜的欺骗”,另一个是“邪恶的生物”和“狡猾的蛇”,实施了“邪恶的欺骗”。最后,我认为斯坦因对女性的欺骗性社会结构提出了质疑,这种社会结构永远试图让女性保持自己的地位。这部剧促成了女性作家之间正在进行的对话,她们抵制女性美德的压迫性要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors' Introduction: Hope, Care, Possibility, Exhaustion
Abstract:This article reads a protofeminist critique of the nineteenth-century gender binary in Charlotte von Stein's lesser-known play, Die zwey Emilien (1803). This dramatic, inventive adaptation of Sophia Lee's melodramatic English novel, The Two Emilys (1795), features two seemingly opposite women, who simultaneously are virtually the same, to demonstrate the lack of space for the woman as individual in Stein's contemporary society. These women are coded as opposites with sometimes humorous, satirical, and outrageous language: one Emilie is the "innocent angel" committing "innocent deceit," the other a "wicked creature" and "cunning snake" practicing "nefarious deceit." Ultimately, I argue that Stein calls into question the deceptive social construct of woman that forever attempts to keep her in her place. This play contributes to the ongoing conversation among female authors who resisted the oppressive demands of feminine virtues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist German Studies
Feminist German Studies WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信