批判性思维工具的有效性和可靠性,以衡量基于上下文的物理电子模块对波浪材料的有效性

IF 3.3 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
D. Desnita
{"title":"批判性思维工具的有效性和可靠性,以衡量基于上下文的物理电子模块对波浪材料的有效性","authors":"D. Desnita","doi":"10.21009/1.08106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical thinking skills can be improved through learning physics. Independent teaching materials such as e-modules are needed. Instruments are needed to measure the success of e-module use. This study aims to develop critical thinking skills instrument on physics learning using e- module-based on the context of the material of mechanical waves and stationary waves. The instrument criteria are valid and reliable. The form of the instrument is an essay test that includes five aspects: Interpretation, Analysis, Evaluation, Explanation, and inference. The instrument consists of 18 items. The development model used is ADDIE, with the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and evaluation. The expert validation for each aspect is content 0.84, construct 0.88, and language 0.83 with valid categories. While the results of the empirical validation for five aspects of critical thinking skills are: interpretation three items, analysis three items, evaluation four items, explanation four items, and inference two items are valid. Four items are invalid. These items were discarded. Reliability for critical thinking instrument obtained 0.78 with good category. Referring to the research finding, it can be concluded that the instrument was feasible to use. The impact of this research is the production of a valid and reliable critical thinking instrument, which is used to measure students’ critical thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":31990,"journal":{"name":"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of Critical Thinking Instruments to Measure the Effectiveness of Context-Based Physics E-Module on Wave Materials\",\"authors\":\"D. Desnita\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/1.08106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical thinking skills can be improved through learning physics. Independent teaching materials such as e-modules are needed. Instruments are needed to measure the success of e-module use. This study aims to develop critical thinking skills instrument on physics learning using e- module-based on the context of the material of mechanical waves and stationary waves. The instrument criteria are valid and reliable. The form of the instrument is an essay test that includes five aspects: Interpretation, Analysis, Evaluation, Explanation, and inference. The instrument consists of 18 items. The development model used is ADDIE, with the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and evaluation. The expert validation for each aspect is content 0.84, construct 0.88, and language 0.83 with valid categories. While the results of the empirical validation for five aspects of critical thinking skills are: interpretation three items, analysis three items, evaluation four items, explanation four items, and inference two items are valid. Four items are invalid. These items were discarded. Reliability for critical thinking instrument obtained 0.78 with good category. Referring to the research finding, it can be concluded that the instrument was feasible to use. The impact of this research is the production of a valid and reliable critical thinking instrument, which is used to measure students’ critical thinking skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/1.08106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

通过学习物理可以提高批判性思维能力。需要电子模块等独立教材。需要仪器来衡量电子模块的使用是否成功。本研究旨在以机械波与驻波材料为背景,利用电子模组开发物理学习的批判性思维工具。仪器指标有效、可靠。该工具的形式是一种论述测试,包括五个方面:解释,分析,评价,解释和推理。该仪器由18个项目组成。使用的开发模型是ADDIE,分为分析、设计、开发、实现和评估四个阶段。每个方面的专家验证值分别为内容0.84、构造0.88和语言0.83。而批判性思维技能五个方面的实证验证结果为:解释三项、分析三项、评价四项、解释四项、推理两项有效。有四项无效。这些物品被丢弃了。批判性思维量表的信度为0.78,类别良好。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,该仪器是可行的。本研究的影响是生产一个有效和可靠的批判性思维工具,这是用来衡量学生的批判性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of Critical Thinking Instruments to Measure the Effectiveness of Context-Based Physics E-Module on Wave Materials
Critical thinking skills can be improved through learning physics. Independent teaching materials such as e-modules are needed. Instruments are needed to measure the success of e-module use. This study aims to develop critical thinking skills instrument on physics learning using e- module-based on the context of the material of mechanical waves and stationary waves. The instrument criteria are valid and reliable. The form of the instrument is an essay test that includes five aspects: Interpretation, Analysis, Evaluation, Explanation, and inference. The instrument consists of 18 items. The development model used is ADDIE, with the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and evaluation. The expert validation for each aspect is content 0.84, construct 0.88, and language 0.83 with valid categories. While the results of the empirical validation for five aspects of critical thinking skills are: interpretation three items, analysis three items, evaluation four items, explanation four items, and inference two items are valid. Four items are invalid. These items were discarded. Reliability for critical thinking instrument obtained 0.78 with good category. Referring to the research finding, it can be concluded that the instrument was feasible to use. The impact of this research is the production of a valid and reliable critical thinking instrument, which is used to measure students’ critical thinking skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信