派生用于使用控制实施的实现级策略

Prachi Kumari, A. Pretschner
{"title":"派生用于使用控制实施的实现级策略","authors":"Prachi Kumari, A. Pretschner","doi":"10.1145/2133601.2133612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usage control is concerned with how data is used after access to it has been granted. As such, it is particularly relevant to end users who own the data. System implementations of access and usage control enforcement mechanisms, however, do not always adequately reflect end user requirements. This is due to several reasons, one of which is the problem of mapping concepts in the end user's domain to technical events and artifacts. For instance, semantics of basic operators such as \"copy\" or \"delete\", which are fundamental for specifying privacy policies, tend to vary according to context. For this reason they can be mapped to different sets of system events. The behaviour users expect from the system, therefore, may differ from the actual behaviour. In this paper we present a translation of specification-level usage control policies into implementation-level policies which takes into account the precise semantics of domain-specific abstractions. A tool for automating the translation has also been implemented.","PeriodicalId":90472,"journal":{"name":"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving implementation-level policies for usage control enforcement\",\"authors\":\"Prachi Kumari, A. Pretschner\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2133601.2133612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usage control is concerned with how data is used after access to it has been granted. As such, it is particularly relevant to end users who own the data. System implementations of access and usage control enforcement mechanisms, however, do not always adequately reflect end user requirements. This is due to several reasons, one of which is the problem of mapping concepts in the end user's domain to technical events and artifacts. For instance, semantics of basic operators such as \\\"copy\\\" or \\\"delete\\\", which are fundamental for specifying privacy policies, tend to vary according to context. For this reason they can be mapped to different sets of system events. The behaviour users expect from the system, therefore, may differ from the actual behaviour. In this paper we present a translation of specification-level usage control policies into implementation-level policies which takes into account the precise semantics of domain-specific abstractions. A tool for automating the translation has also been implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"83-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2133601.2133612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CODASPY : proceedings of the ... ACM conference on data and application security and privacy. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2133601.2133612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

使用控制关注的是数据在被授予访问权限后如何被使用。因此,它与拥有数据的最终用户特别相关。然而,访问和使用控制强制机制的系统实现并不总是充分反映最终用户的需求。这是由于几个原因造成的,其中之一是将最终用户领域中的概念映射到技术事件和工件的问题。例如,“复制”或“删除”等基本操作符(它们是指定隐私策略的基础)的语义往往会根据上下文而变化。由于这个原因,它们可以映射到不同的系统事件集。因此,用户期望系统的行为可能与实际行为不同。在本文中,我们提出了一种将规范级使用控制策略转换为实现级策略的方法,该策略考虑了特定领域抽象的精确语义。还实现了一个自动化翻译的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deriving implementation-level policies for usage control enforcement
Usage control is concerned with how data is used after access to it has been granted. As such, it is particularly relevant to end users who own the data. System implementations of access and usage control enforcement mechanisms, however, do not always adequately reflect end user requirements. This is due to several reasons, one of which is the problem of mapping concepts in the end user's domain to technical events and artifacts. For instance, semantics of basic operators such as "copy" or "delete", which are fundamental for specifying privacy policies, tend to vary according to context. For this reason they can be mapped to different sets of system events. The behaviour users expect from the system, therefore, may differ from the actual behaviour. In this paper we present a translation of specification-level usage control policies into implementation-level policies which takes into account the precise semantics of domain-specific abstractions. A tool for automating the translation has also been implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信