学生们在课堂上通过一个引出错误的任务来犯错误

Claire Cornock, Alexandra Shukie, Rosalyn Porter, David O’Sullivan
{"title":"学生们在课堂上通过一个引出错误的任务来犯错误","authors":"Claire Cornock, Alexandra Shukie, Rosalyn Porter, David O’Sullivan","doi":"10.21100/msor.v19i2.1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order for students to develop a better understanding and the skills to question future work, a session is introduced into a teaching workshop which sets students up to make common mistakes within a topic are more often made by blindly following procedural methods. The students’ views on these mistakes and how they found the error-eliciting task were gained through focus groups on the day of the activity. Factors such as knowing whether they had the right answer and the amount of staff involvement were discussed. In a follow-on focus group two weeks after the session, there were indications that the session had an impact on how they worked generally as there was more discussion within class and a shift in views about making mistakes.  ","PeriodicalId":18932,"journal":{"name":"MSOR connections","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students being set up to make mistakes in class through an error-eliciting task\",\"authors\":\"Claire Cornock, Alexandra Shukie, Rosalyn Porter, David O’Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.21100/msor.v19i2.1120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order for students to develop a better understanding and the skills to question future work, a session is introduced into a teaching workshop which sets students up to make common mistakes within a topic are more often made by blindly following procedural methods. The students’ views on these mistakes and how they found the error-eliciting task were gained through focus groups on the day of the activity. Factors such as knowing whether they had the right answer and the amount of staff involvement were discussed. In a follow-on focus group two weeks after the session, there were indications that the session had an impact on how they worked generally as there was more discussion within class and a shift in views about making mistakes.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":18932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MSOR connections\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MSOR connections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v19i2.1120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSOR connections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v19i2.1120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了让学生更好地理解和质疑未来工作的技能,在教学研讨会中引入了一个环节,让学生在一个主题中犯常见的错误,这些错误往往是由于盲目地遵循程序方法而犯的。通过活动当天的焦点小组讨论,了解学生对这些错误的看法以及他们是如何发现引起错误的任务的。讨论了诸如知道他们是否有正确答案和员工参与程度等因素。在课程两周后的后续焦点小组中,有迹象表明,课程对他们的总体工作方式产生了影响,因为课堂上有了更多的讨论,对犯错误的看法也发生了转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students being set up to make mistakes in class through an error-eliciting task
In order for students to develop a better understanding and the skills to question future work, a session is introduced into a teaching workshop which sets students up to make common mistakes within a topic are more often made by blindly following procedural methods. The students’ views on these mistakes and how they found the error-eliciting task were gained through focus groups on the day of the activity. Factors such as knowing whether they had the right answer and the amount of staff involvement were discussed. In a follow-on focus group two weeks after the session, there were indications that the session had an impact on how they worked generally as there was more discussion within class and a shift in views about making mistakes.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信