超临界二氧化碳溶剂对94.2:5.8乙醇与辛烷的溶解度研究

R. Davarnejad, K.M. Kassim, A. Zainal, Suhairi A. Sata
{"title":"超临界二氧化碳溶剂对94.2:5.8乙醇与辛烷的溶解度研究","authors":"R. Davarnejad,&nbsp;K.M. Kassim,&nbsp;A. Zainal,&nbsp;Suhairi A. Sata","doi":"10.1016/j.jcice.2008.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solubility data of a mixture containing 94.2% ethanol and 5.8% octane was measured in carbon dioxide solvent using a high-pressure type phase equilibrium apparatus at pressures up to 103.5<!--> <!-->bar and at temperature of 75<!--> <!-->°C. The results showed that considerable separation was not achieved in this ethanol and octane ratio. However, the experimental data were then compared with the theoretical data which were obtained from two models which are regular solution theory and Redlich–Kwong equation of state. Regular solution theory is employed to each phase by applying activity coefficient expressions. Redlich–Kwong equation of state is employed to the vapor phase and then with applying fugacity coefficient, liquid phase data is obtained. The regular solution theory as a novel model approach has been found to be encouraging for the prediction of phase equilibria solubilities. It concluded that the regular solution theory model could predict two phases equilibrium data better than Redlich–Kwong equation of state.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17285,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcice.2008.03.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutual solubility study for 94.2:5.8 of ethanol to octane with supercritical carbon dioxide solvent\",\"authors\":\"R. Davarnejad,&nbsp;K.M. Kassim,&nbsp;A. Zainal,&nbsp;Suhairi A. Sata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcice.2008.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Solubility data of a mixture containing 94.2% ethanol and 5.8% octane was measured in carbon dioxide solvent using a high-pressure type phase equilibrium apparatus at pressures up to 103.5<!--> <!-->bar and at temperature of 75<!--> <!-->°C. The results showed that considerable separation was not achieved in this ethanol and octane ratio. However, the experimental data were then compared with the theoretical data which were obtained from two models which are regular solution theory and Redlich–Kwong equation of state. Regular solution theory is employed to each phase by applying activity coefficient expressions. Redlich–Kwong equation of state is employed to the vapor phase and then with applying fugacity coefficient, liquid phase data is obtained. The regular solution theory as a novel model approach has been found to be encouraging for the prediction of phase equilibria solubilities. It concluded that the regular solution theory model could predict two phases equilibrium data better than Redlich–Kwong equation of state.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcice.2008.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368165308000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368165308000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

采用高压相平衡仪,在压力103.5 bar,温度75℃的条件下,测定了94.2%乙醇和5.8%辛烷值的混合物在二氧化碳溶剂中的溶解度数据。结果表明,该乙醇与辛烷值的比例不能实现相当程度的分离。然后,将实验数据与正则解理论和Redlich-Kwong状态方程两种模型的理论数据进行了比较。通过应用活度系数表达式,将正则解理论应用于各相。采用Redlich-Kwong状态方程求解气相,再应用逸度系数得到液相数据。正则解理论作为一种新的模型方法,对相平衡溶解度的预测具有鼓舞人心的作用。结果表明,正则解理论模型比Redlich-Kwong状态方程能更好地预测两相平衡数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutual solubility study for 94.2:5.8 of ethanol to octane with supercritical carbon dioxide solvent

Solubility data of a mixture containing 94.2% ethanol and 5.8% octane was measured in carbon dioxide solvent using a high-pressure type phase equilibrium apparatus at pressures up to 103.5 bar and at temperature of 75 °C. The results showed that considerable separation was not achieved in this ethanol and octane ratio. However, the experimental data were then compared with the theoretical data which were obtained from two models which are regular solution theory and Redlich–Kwong equation of state. Regular solution theory is employed to each phase by applying activity coefficient expressions. Redlich–Kwong equation of state is employed to the vapor phase and then with applying fugacity coefficient, liquid phase data is obtained. The regular solution theory as a novel model approach has been found to be encouraging for the prediction of phase equilibria solubilities. It concluded that the regular solution theory model could predict two phases equilibrium data better than Redlich–Kwong equation of state.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信