当债务人保留其养老金计划时,PBGC赢了一个案子

Israel Goldowitz, Garth Wilson, E. Kim, Kirsten Bender
{"title":"当债务人保留其养老金计划时,PBGC赢了一个案子","authors":"Israel Goldowitz, Garth Wilson, E. Kim, Kirsten Bender","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2716996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the federal agency charged with insuring private-sector defined benefit pension plans, has long had a prominent role in corporate bankruptcies. PBGC focuses its effort on the continuation of pension plans, in true reorganizations and in sales of businesses. To this end, ERISA has made it more difficult for a sponsor to terminate a plan in its own economic interest. For example, a sponsor's latitude to terminate an underfunded plan was limited to circumstances involving the sponsor's financial distress. Likewise, the termination premium, which was added to ERISA in recent years, is an obligation that survives bankruptcy and it may help to deter some unwarranted terminations. Unfortunately, in some cases, PBGC must seek plan termination, and PBGC then seeks to maximize its recoveries. These are blunt tools, however, and the case law has further dulled them. With plan continuation the preferred outcome, PBGC succeeds in its statutory mission whenever a sponsor emerges from bankruptcy with its pension plan ongoing.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PBGC Wins a Case When the Debtor Keeps Its Pension Plan\",\"authors\":\"Israel Goldowitz, Garth Wilson, E. Kim, Kirsten Bender\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2716996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the federal agency charged with insuring private-sector defined benefit pension plans, has long had a prominent role in corporate bankruptcies. PBGC focuses its effort on the continuation of pension plans, in true reorganizations and in sales of businesses. To this end, ERISA has made it more difficult for a sponsor to terminate a plan in its own economic interest. For example, a sponsor's latitude to terminate an underfunded plan was limited to circumstances involving the sponsor's financial distress. Likewise, the termination premium, which was added to ERISA in recent years, is an obligation that survives bankruptcy and it may help to deter some unwarranted terminations. Unfortunately, in some cases, PBGC must seek plan termination, and PBGC then seeks to maximize its recoveries. These are blunt tools, however, and the case law has further dulled them. With plan continuation the preferred outcome, PBGC succeeds in its statutory mission whenever a sponsor emerges from bankruptcy with its pension plan ongoing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employee benefits journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employee benefits journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2716996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2716996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

长期以来,负责为私营部门固定收益养老金计划提供保险的联邦机构养老金福利担保公司(Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation)在企业破产中一直扮演着重要角色。PBGC专注于养老金计划的延续、真正的重组和业务销售。为此,ERISA使保荐人更难以出于自身经济利益而终止计划。例如,保荐人终止资金不足计划的自由仅限于涉及保荐人财务困难的情况。同样,近年来加入ERISA的解雇费是一项在破产后仍然有效的义务,它可能有助于阻止一些没有根据的解雇。不幸的是,在某些情况下,PBGC必须寻求终止计划,然后PBGC寻求最大化其恢复。然而,这些都是生硬的工具,判例法进一步使它们变得迟钝。由于计划延续是首选结果,每当赞助商从破产中脱颖而出,其养老金计划仍在进行时,PBGC就会成功履行其法定使命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The PBGC Wins a Case When the Debtor Keeps Its Pension Plan
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the federal agency charged with insuring private-sector defined benefit pension plans, has long had a prominent role in corporate bankruptcies. PBGC focuses its effort on the continuation of pension plans, in true reorganizations and in sales of businesses. To this end, ERISA has made it more difficult for a sponsor to terminate a plan in its own economic interest. For example, a sponsor's latitude to terminate an underfunded plan was limited to circumstances involving the sponsor's financial distress. Likewise, the termination premium, which was added to ERISA in recent years, is an obligation that survives bankruptcy and it may help to deter some unwarranted terminations. Unfortunately, in some cases, PBGC must seek plan termination, and PBGC then seeks to maximize its recoveries. These are blunt tools, however, and the case law has further dulled them. With plan continuation the preferred outcome, PBGC succeeds in its statutory mission whenever a sponsor emerges from bankruptcy with its pension plan ongoing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信