D. Kannan, Revathi Thiyagarajan, G. Shenbagalakshmi
{"title":"基于AHP和TOPSIS方法的SDN控制器选择通用方法","authors":"D. Kannan, Revathi Thiyagarajan, G. Shenbagalakshmi","doi":"10.1142/s0219622022500067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The control plane plays an essential role in the implementation of Software Defined Network (SDN) architecture. Basically, the control plane is an isolated process and operates on control layer. The control layer encompasses controllers which provide a global view of the entire SDN. The Controller selection is more crucial for the network administrator to meet the specific use case. This research work mainly focuses on obtaining a better SDN controller. Initially, the SDN controllers are selected using integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP and TOPSIS) method. It facilitates to select minimal number of controllers based on their features in the SDN application. Finally, the performance evaluation is carried out using the CBENCH tool considering the best four ranked controllers obtained from the previous step. In addition, it is validated with the real-time internet topology such as Abilene and ERNET considering the delay factor. The result shows that the “Floodlight” controller responds better for latency and throughput. The selection of an optimum controller-Floodlight, using the real-world Internet topologies, outperforms in obtaining the path with a 28.57% decrease in delay in Abilene and 16.94% in ERNET. The proposed work can be applied in high traffic SDN applications.","PeriodicalId":13527,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","volume":"130 1","pages":"1031-1059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generic Method for SDN Controller Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods\",\"authors\":\"D. Kannan, Revathi Thiyagarajan, G. Shenbagalakshmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0219622022500067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The control plane plays an essential role in the implementation of Software Defined Network (SDN) architecture. Basically, the control plane is an isolated process and operates on control layer. The control layer encompasses controllers which provide a global view of the entire SDN. The Controller selection is more crucial for the network administrator to meet the specific use case. This research work mainly focuses on obtaining a better SDN controller. Initially, the SDN controllers are selected using integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP and TOPSIS) method. It facilitates to select minimal number of controllers based on their features in the SDN application. Finally, the performance evaluation is carried out using the CBENCH tool considering the best four ranked controllers obtained from the previous step. In addition, it is validated with the real-time internet topology such as Abilene and ERNET considering the delay factor. The result shows that the “Floodlight” controller responds better for latency and throughput. The selection of an optimum controller-Floodlight, using the real-world Internet topologies, outperforms in obtaining the path with a 28.57% decrease in delay in Abilene and 16.94% in ERNET. The proposed work can be applied in high traffic SDN applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"1031-1059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622022500067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622022500067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
控制平面在实现软件定义网络(SDN)体系结构中起着至关重要的作用。基本上,控制平面是一个孤立的过程,并在控制层上运行。控制层包括提供整个SDN全局视图的控制器。对于网络管理员来说,控制器的选择对于满足特定用例更为重要。本文的研究工作主要是为了获得一个更好的SDN控制器。首先,采用层次分析法(AHP)和TOPSIS (Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution)方法选择SDN控制器。它便于在SDN应用中根据控制器的特性选择最少数量的控制器。最后,利用CBENCH工具对前一步得到的最佳4个排序控制器进行性能评估。并在考虑延迟因素的实时网络拓扑如Abilene和ERNET上进行了验证。结果表明,“泛光灯”控制器对延迟和吞吐量的响应更好。选择最优控制器-泛光灯,使用现实世界的互联网拓扑,在获得路径方面表现出色,在Abilene中延迟减少28.57%,在ERNET中延迟减少16.94%。该工作可以应用于高流量的SDN应用。
Generic Method for SDN Controller Selection Using AHP and TOPSIS Methods
The control plane plays an essential role in the implementation of Software Defined Network (SDN) architecture. Basically, the control plane is an isolated process and operates on control layer. The control layer encompasses controllers which provide a global view of the entire SDN. The Controller selection is more crucial for the network administrator to meet the specific use case. This research work mainly focuses on obtaining a better SDN controller. Initially, the SDN controllers are selected using integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (AHP and TOPSIS) method. It facilitates to select minimal number of controllers based on their features in the SDN application. Finally, the performance evaluation is carried out using the CBENCH tool considering the best four ranked controllers obtained from the previous step. In addition, it is validated with the real-time internet topology such as Abilene and ERNET considering the delay factor. The result shows that the “Floodlight” controller responds better for latency and throughput. The selection of an optimum controller-Floodlight, using the real-world Internet topologies, outperforms in obtaining the path with a 28.57% decrease in delay in Abilene and 16.94% in ERNET. The proposed work can be applied in high traffic SDN applications.