政治社群主义、内在主义社会学与领域主权

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Koers Pub Date : 2018-07-21 DOI:10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2317
A. Raath
{"title":"政治社群主义、内在主义社会学与领域主权","authors":"A. Raath","doi":"10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Politocratic communitarianism supports the historic revival of ancient Greek notions of social life in opposition to the nominalist trends in modernistic philosophy of society. The need for a penetrating normative philosophy of society from an integral non-dualistic angle to social life is manifest from Danie Goosen's and Koos Malan's pursuit of the neo-Aristotelian philosophical revival of the Greek polis: their formalistic approach to sociology, the dialectical tension between \"normativity\" and \"factuality\", and the juxtaposing of the \"general\" and the \"specific\" in their approach to social phenomena. In this article the shortcomings of politocratic communitarianism are traced to its immanentist approach to social theory with all the ensuing dialectical tensions emanating from its social philosophy and its views on the role of the state in society.","PeriodicalId":38057,"journal":{"name":"Koers","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politocratic communitarianism, immanentist sociology and sphere sovereignty\",\"authors\":\"A. Raath\",\"doi\":\"10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Politocratic communitarianism supports the historic revival of ancient Greek notions of social life in opposition to the nominalist trends in modernistic philosophy of society. The need for a penetrating normative philosophy of society from an integral non-dualistic angle to social life is manifest from Danie Goosen's and Koos Malan's pursuit of the neo-Aristotelian philosophical revival of the Greek polis: their formalistic approach to sociology, the dialectical tension between \\\"normativity\\\" and \\\"factuality\\\", and the juxtaposing of the \\\"general\\\" and the \\\"specific\\\" in their approach to social phenomena. In this article the shortcomings of politocratic communitarianism are traced to its immanentist approach to social theory with all the ensuing dialectical tensions emanating from its social philosophy and its views on the role of the state in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koers\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.83.1.2317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治社群主义支持古希腊社会生活观念的历史性复兴,以反对现代主义社会哲学中的唯名主义趋势。丹尼·古森和库斯·马兰对希腊polis的新亚里士多德哲学复兴的追求,体现了他们对社会学的形式主义方法,“规范性”和“事实性”之间的辩证张力,以及他们对社会现象的“一般”和“特殊”的并列性,都需要从一个完整的非二元论的角度对社会生活进行渗透的规范哲学。在这篇文章中,政治社群主义的缺点被追溯到它对社会理论的内在主义方法,以及它的社会哲学和它对国家在社会中的作用的看法所产生的所有随之而来的辩证紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Politocratic communitarianism, immanentist sociology and sphere sovereignty
Politocratic communitarianism supports the historic revival of ancient Greek notions of social life in opposition to the nominalist trends in modernistic philosophy of society. The need for a penetrating normative philosophy of society from an integral non-dualistic angle to social life is manifest from Danie Goosen's and Koos Malan's pursuit of the neo-Aristotelian philosophical revival of the Greek polis: their formalistic approach to sociology, the dialectical tension between "normativity" and "factuality", and the juxtaposing of the "general" and the "specific" in their approach to social phenomena. In this article the shortcomings of politocratic communitarianism are traced to its immanentist approach to social theory with all the ensuing dialectical tensions emanating from its social philosophy and its views on the role of the state in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Koers
Koers Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信