S. Kabir, Sheikh Mehbish Jahan, Mahboob Hossain, Romana Siddique
{"title":"苹果、番石榴和菠萝果实提取物对致病菌的抗菌作用","authors":"S. Kabir, Sheikh Mehbish Jahan, Mahboob Hossain, Romana Siddique","doi":"10.12691/AJMR-5-5-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation was conducted to compare the antimicrobial properties of alcohol fruit extracts from Apple (Malus pumila), Guava (Psidium guajava), and Pineapple (Ananas comosus) against eight bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Enteroaggregative E.coli (EAEC), Enterotoxigenic E.coli (ETEC), Enterobacter cloacae, Shigella flexineri, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All the fruits were bought fresh from the market, cut into small cubes, and sun dried to a crisp over 4-5 days. After being blended to a fine powder, 75g of each powder was passed through a Soxhlet apparatus containing 250 ml of 99% ethanol to obtain a crude extract. This process was repeated with 250 ml of methanol to obtain a methanolic crude extract. The antimicrobial properties of the extracts were tested using agar well diffusion, Norfloxacin used as positive control and water as negative control. The inhibition zones from each extract were measured and an activity index was calculated from the mean zone sizes. All fruits showed some degree of antimicrobial properties with the highest activity index (2.6) being from Pineapple ethanolic and methanolic extracts against EAEC. Both Apple ethanolic and methanolic extracts showed activity only against Staph. aureus and EAEC. Guava extracts were effective against all the strains except for ETEC. Pineapple extracts were strongly active against all the bacteria. The methanolic extracts of Apple and Guava showed slightly larger zones compared to their ethanolic extracts. For Pineapple, inhibition zones from the ethanolic extracts were slightly larger. The results of this investigation show great promise for potential antimicrobial drugs.","PeriodicalId":7580,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Microbiological Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"101-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apple, Guava and Pineapple Fruit Extracts as Antimicrobial Agents against Pathogenic Bacteria\",\"authors\":\"S. Kabir, Sheikh Mehbish Jahan, Mahboob Hossain, Romana Siddique\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/AJMR-5-5-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This investigation was conducted to compare the antimicrobial properties of alcohol fruit extracts from Apple (Malus pumila), Guava (Psidium guajava), and Pineapple (Ananas comosus) against eight bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Enteroaggregative E.coli (EAEC), Enterotoxigenic E.coli (ETEC), Enterobacter cloacae, Shigella flexineri, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All the fruits were bought fresh from the market, cut into small cubes, and sun dried to a crisp over 4-5 days. After being blended to a fine powder, 75g of each powder was passed through a Soxhlet apparatus containing 250 ml of 99% ethanol to obtain a crude extract. This process was repeated with 250 ml of methanol to obtain a methanolic crude extract. The antimicrobial properties of the extracts were tested using agar well diffusion, Norfloxacin used as positive control and water as negative control. The inhibition zones from each extract were measured and an activity index was calculated from the mean zone sizes. All fruits showed some degree of antimicrobial properties with the highest activity index (2.6) being from Pineapple ethanolic and methanolic extracts against EAEC. Both Apple ethanolic and methanolic extracts showed activity only against Staph. aureus and EAEC. Guava extracts were effective against all the strains except for ETEC. Pineapple extracts were strongly active against all the bacteria. The methanolic extracts of Apple and Guava showed slightly larger zones compared to their ethanolic extracts. For Pineapple, inhibition zones from the ethanolic extracts were slightly larger. The results of this investigation show great promise for potential antimicrobial drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Microbiological Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"101-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Microbiological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJMR-5-5-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Microbiological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/AJMR-5-5-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
本研究比较了苹果(Malus pumila)、番石榴(Psidium guajava)和菠萝(Ananas comosus)酒精水果提取物对金黄色葡萄球菌、肠聚集性大肠杆菌(EAEC)、产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)、阴沟肠杆菌、弯曲志贺菌、粪肠球菌、克雷伯氏菌和铜绿假单胞菌等8种细菌的抑菌性能。所有的水果都是从市场上新鲜买来的,切成小方块,晒干后4-5天就变脆了。混合成细粉后,每种粉末取75g通过含有250 ml 99%乙醇的索氏装置,得到粗提取物。用250 ml甲醇重复此过程,得到甲醇粗提取物。采用琼脂孔扩散法,以诺氟沙星为阳性对照,以水为阴性对照,对提取液的抗菌性能进行检测。测定了各提取物的抑制区,并根据平均区大小计算了活性指数。所有果实均表现出不同程度的抑菌活性,其中菠萝乙醇和甲醇提取物对EAEC的活性指数最高(2.6)。苹果乙醇提取物和甲醇提取物均对葡萄球菌有抑制作用。金黄色葡萄球菌和EAEC。除ETEC外,番石榴提取物对其他菌株均有抑制作用。菠萝提取物对所有细菌均有较强的抑制作用。与乙醇提取物相比,苹果和番石榴的甲醇提取物的区域略大。对于菠萝,乙醇提取物的抑制区略大。这项研究的结果显示了潜在抗菌药物的巨大前景。
Apple, Guava and Pineapple Fruit Extracts as Antimicrobial Agents against Pathogenic Bacteria
This investigation was conducted to compare the antimicrobial properties of alcohol fruit extracts from Apple (Malus pumila), Guava (Psidium guajava), and Pineapple (Ananas comosus) against eight bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Enteroaggregative E.coli (EAEC), Enterotoxigenic E.coli (ETEC), Enterobacter cloacae, Shigella flexineri, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All the fruits were bought fresh from the market, cut into small cubes, and sun dried to a crisp over 4-5 days. After being blended to a fine powder, 75g of each powder was passed through a Soxhlet apparatus containing 250 ml of 99% ethanol to obtain a crude extract. This process was repeated with 250 ml of methanol to obtain a methanolic crude extract. The antimicrobial properties of the extracts were tested using agar well diffusion, Norfloxacin used as positive control and water as negative control. The inhibition zones from each extract were measured and an activity index was calculated from the mean zone sizes. All fruits showed some degree of antimicrobial properties with the highest activity index (2.6) being from Pineapple ethanolic and methanolic extracts against EAEC. Both Apple ethanolic and methanolic extracts showed activity only against Staph. aureus and EAEC. Guava extracts were effective against all the strains except for ETEC. Pineapple extracts were strongly active against all the bacteria. The methanolic extracts of Apple and Guava showed slightly larger zones compared to their ethanolic extracts. For Pineapple, inhibition zones from the ethanolic extracts were slightly larger. The results of this investigation show great promise for potential antimicrobial drugs.