寻求一种适当的概念框架和方法来应付技术经济动态所带来的挑战

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-310-9.07

M. Lombardi

{"title":"寻求一种适当的概念框架和方法来应付技术经济动态所带来的挑战","authors":"M. Lombardi","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-310-9.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, first three traditional frames centered on innovation processes and innovative strategies are analyzed: Linear Model, National Innovation Systems, Evolutonary Approach to the analysis of economic processes. The reasons that lead us to seek a new conceptual frame, which we define adaptive strategic thinking on the basis of a theoretical and empirical literature, are explained.","PeriodicalId":41379,"journal":{"name":"Studi e Saggi Linguistici","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La ricerca di uno schema concettuale e di una metodologia appropriati per affrontare le sfide generate dalla dinamica tecno-economica\",\"authors\":\"M. Lombardi\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/978-88-5518-310-9.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, first three traditional frames centered on innovation processes and innovative strategies are analyzed: Linear Model, National Innovation Systems, Evolutonary Approach to the analysis of economic processes. The reasons that lead us to seek a new conceptual frame, which we define adaptive strategic thinking on the basis of a theoretical and empirical literature, are explained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studi e Saggi Linguistici\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studi e Saggi Linguistici\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-310-9.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi e Saggi Linguistici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-310-9.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本章首先分析了以创新过程和创新战略为中心的三个传统框架:线性模型、国家创新系统、经济过程分析的进化方法。本文解释了导致我们寻求一个新的概念框架的原因，我们在理论和实证文献的基础上定义了适应性战略思维。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

La ricerca di uno schema concettuale e di una metodologia appropriati per affrontare le sfide generate dalla dinamica tecno-economica

In this chapter, first three traditional frames centered on innovation processes and innovative strategies are analyzed: Linear Model, National Innovation Systems, Evolutonary Approach to the analysis of economic processes. The reasons that lead us to seek a new conceptual frame, which we define adaptive strategic thinking on the basis of a theoretical and empirical literature, are explained.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.