三种典型空调送风方式对室内热环境及PPD评价指标的影响进行了模拟计算

Zeqin Liu, Ge Li, Chen Zheng
{"title":"三种典型空调送风方式对室内热环境及PPD评价指标的影响进行了模拟计算","authors":"Zeqin Liu, Ge Li, Chen Zheng","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2014.888908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation method was used in this study to simulate the indoor thermal environment affected by three air-supply modes, upper-supply bottom-return mode, upper-supply top-return mode, and bottom-supply top-return mode, in the condition of the fixed point heat source, and explored the change rule of the predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) affected by the three air-supply modes. A suitable air-conditioning supply mode might better meet the requirements of human to the indoor thermal environment. The results, based on the calculation and analysis of indoor air distribution, temperature field, and thermal comfort, showed that the mixing degree of supply air and indoor air of upper-supply mode was better than that of bottom-supply mode, and the uniformity of temperature distribution of upper-supply top-return pattern was better. Moreover, in the personal breathing zone (0.8–1.6 m), the pattern of upper-supply top-return obtained the lowest PPD value. It can be seen that the mode of upper-supply top-return is more comfortable according to the evaluation index of human thermal comfort.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"90 1","pages":"344 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The simulation and calculation of indoor thermal environment and the PPD evaluation index affected by three typical air-conditioning supply modes\",\"authors\":\"Zeqin Liu, Ge Li, Chen Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10789669.2014.888908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation method was used in this study to simulate the indoor thermal environment affected by three air-supply modes, upper-supply bottom-return mode, upper-supply top-return mode, and bottom-supply top-return mode, in the condition of the fixed point heat source, and explored the change rule of the predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) affected by the three air-supply modes. A suitable air-conditioning supply mode might better meet the requirements of human to the indoor thermal environment. The results, based on the calculation and analysis of indoor air distribution, temperature field, and thermal comfort, showed that the mixing degree of supply air and indoor air of upper-supply mode was better than that of bottom-supply mode, and the uniformity of temperature distribution of upper-supply top-return pattern was better. Moreover, in the personal breathing zone (0.8–1.6 m), the pattern of upper-supply top-return obtained the lowest PPD value. It can be seen that the mode of upper-supply top-return is more comfortable according to the evaluation index of human thermal comfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"344 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.888908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2014.888908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

采用计算流体力学(CFD)数值模拟方法,模拟定点热源条件下,上送风下回风、上送风上回风、下送风上回风三种送风方式对室内热环境的影响,探讨三种送风方式对预测不满意率(PPD)的影响规律。合适的空调送风方式可以更好地满足人类对室内热环境的需求。通过对室内气流组织、温度场和热舒适的计算分析,结果表明:上送风模式送风与室内空气混合程度优于下送风模式,上送风顶回模式温度分布均匀性更好。在个人呼吸区(0.8 ~ 1.6 m),上供顶回模式的PPD值最低。根据人体热舒适评价指标可以看出,上供上回模式更为舒适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The simulation and calculation of indoor thermal environment and the PPD evaluation index affected by three typical air-conditioning supply modes
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation method was used in this study to simulate the indoor thermal environment affected by three air-supply modes, upper-supply bottom-return mode, upper-supply top-return mode, and bottom-supply top-return mode, in the condition of the fixed point heat source, and explored the change rule of the predicted percentage dissatisfied (PPD) affected by the three air-supply modes. A suitable air-conditioning supply mode might better meet the requirements of human to the indoor thermal environment. The results, based on the calculation and analysis of indoor air distribution, temperature field, and thermal comfort, showed that the mixing degree of supply air and indoor air of upper-supply mode was better than that of bottom-supply mode, and the uniformity of temperature distribution of upper-supply top-return pattern was better. Moreover, in the personal breathing zone (0.8–1.6 m), the pattern of upper-supply top-return obtained the lowest PPD value. It can be seen that the mode of upper-supply top-return is more comfortable according to the evaluation index of human thermal comfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信