团队构成对公司涌现的时间动态影响:考察表现最好的个人、家庭和团队创业公司

Enrique Nunez
{"title":"团队构成对公司涌现的时间动态影响:考察表现最好的个人、家庭和团队创业公司","authors":"Enrique Nunez","doi":"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ap.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionFirm emergence is the \"the temporal sequence of events or activities that occur as entrepreneurs create a new business\" (Liao & Welsch, 2008) and includes the types of venture creation actions that all nascent entrepreneurs initiate in attempting to launch a firm, such as: obtaining resources, developing new products, seeking funding, and making sales. Yet, the temporal dynamics of firms during this gestation period are not well understood. Some scholars have argued that firms emerge through a relatively sequential series of somewhat predictable phases (Churchill & Lewis, 1983; Galbraith, 1982; Gartner & Starr, 1993). An alternative perspective argues that the gestation period is a disorganized assortment of startup activities (Korunka, Frank, Lueger, & Mugler, 2003; Liao, Welsch & Tan, 2005) and point to the relative insignificance of startup activity timing (Carroll & Hannan, 2000). As a result, some scholars judge the completion of a series of startup activities a useful method by which to evaluate whether firms are emerging (e.g. Block & MacMillan, 1985; Carter, Gartner, & Reynolds, 1996; Manolova, Edelman, Brush & Rotefoss, 2012). Yet, the point at which a series of startup activities results in the creation of a new firm can be difficult to determine (Reynolds & Miller, 1992). As a result, in our study, we adopt the view that advocates for quantifying the achievement of a succession of startup activities as the method by which to gauge firm emergence. The type of enterprise may also have bearing on firms' emergent growth and trajectory, as the dynamics at play within firms started by individual entrepreneurs may impact firm emergence differently than within those firms started by a plurality of founders. Similarly, startups founded by teams composed of non-family members may emerge in a different manner than those started within families. Our overall interest lies in developing a better understanding of the temporal dynamics of firm emergence during the gestation period, and to help identify what is unique about those new firms with a substantial growth trajectory.In this study, we examine the growth and variation in firm emergence by enterprise type. In this investigation we are led by the research question: Do startups differ in their venture creation process in terms of the levels of firm emergence (i.e. the number of startup activities completed) and in the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory based on peer group association? To explore this issue, we develop hypotheses for the following sequence of investigative questions that examine the levels of firm emergence over time, the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory, and determine if the firm emergent change differs for groups of firms.To test our hypotheses, we develop longitudinal models that probe the dynamics of emergence by examining firms' successive measurements during the gestation period using a sample drawn from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II (PSED II), a database of US-based individuals in various stages of starting a firm.Our study helps to contribute to an increasing scholarly interest in research that lies at the nexus of entrepreneurship and family business in pertinent and significant ways. An understanding of entrepreneurial teams has grown in the past several years, yet the literature on entrepreneurial teams comprised of family members is limited. In addition, relative to their importance, there is scant information that compares the firm gestation process of nascent solo entrepreneurs, with that of non-family and family business startup teams. We focus on the completion of a series of startup activities by modeling the temporal dynamics of nascent firms to provide insight into how startups emerge over time, and to allow researchers to better develop well-informed questions for subsequent study. Therefore, our study also contributes to understanding of the gestation period, a critical phase in the startup process. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"29 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Temporal Dynamics of Firm Emergence by Team Composition: Examining Top-Performing Solo, Family, and Team-Based Startups\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Nunez\",\"doi\":\"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ap.00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionFirm emergence is the \\\"the temporal sequence of events or activities that occur as entrepreneurs create a new business\\\" (Liao & Welsch, 2008) and includes the types of venture creation actions that all nascent entrepreneurs initiate in attempting to launch a firm, such as: obtaining resources, developing new products, seeking funding, and making sales. Yet, the temporal dynamics of firms during this gestation period are not well understood. Some scholars have argued that firms emerge through a relatively sequential series of somewhat predictable phases (Churchill & Lewis, 1983; Galbraith, 1982; Gartner & Starr, 1993). An alternative perspective argues that the gestation period is a disorganized assortment of startup activities (Korunka, Frank, Lueger, & Mugler, 2003; Liao, Welsch & Tan, 2005) and point to the relative insignificance of startup activity timing (Carroll & Hannan, 2000). As a result, some scholars judge the completion of a series of startup activities a useful method by which to evaluate whether firms are emerging (e.g. Block & MacMillan, 1985; Carter, Gartner, & Reynolds, 1996; Manolova, Edelman, Brush & Rotefoss, 2012). Yet, the point at which a series of startup activities results in the creation of a new firm can be difficult to determine (Reynolds & Miller, 1992). As a result, in our study, we adopt the view that advocates for quantifying the achievement of a succession of startup activities as the method by which to gauge firm emergence. The type of enterprise may also have bearing on firms' emergent growth and trajectory, as the dynamics at play within firms started by individual entrepreneurs may impact firm emergence differently than within those firms started by a plurality of founders. Similarly, startups founded by teams composed of non-family members may emerge in a different manner than those started within families. Our overall interest lies in developing a better understanding of the temporal dynamics of firm emergence during the gestation period, and to help identify what is unique about those new firms with a substantial growth trajectory.In this study, we examine the growth and variation in firm emergence by enterprise type. In this investigation we are led by the research question: Do startups differ in their venture creation process in terms of the levels of firm emergence (i.e. the number of startup activities completed) and in the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory based on peer group association? To explore this issue, we develop hypotheses for the following sequence of investigative questions that examine the levels of firm emergence over time, the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory, and determine if the firm emergent change differs for groups of firms.To test our hypotheses, we develop longitudinal models that probe the dynamics of emergence by examining firms' successive measurements during the gestation period using a sample drawn from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II (PSED II), a database of US-based individuals in various stages of starting a firm.Our study helps to contribute to an increasing scholarly interest in research that lies at the nexus of entrepreneurship and family business in pertinent and significant ways. An understanding of entrepreneurial teams has grown in the past several years, yet the literature on entrepreneurial teams comprised of family members is limited. In addition, relative to their importance, there is scant information that compares the firm gestation process of nascent solo entrepreneurs, with that of non-family and family business startup teams. We focus on the completion of a series of startup activities by modeling the temporal dynamics of nascent firms to provide insight into how startups emerge over time, and to allow researchers to better develop well-informed questions for subsequent study. Therefore, our study also contributes to understanding of the gestation period, a critical phase in the startup process. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":90357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ap.00007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ap.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

企业涌现是“企业家创建新企业时发生的事件或活动的时间序列”(Liao & Welsch, 2008),包括所有新生企业家在试图创办公司时发起的风险创造行动的类型,例如:获取资源、开发新产品、寻求资金和销售。然而,企业在这一酝酿期的时间动态并没有得到很好的理解。一些学者认为,企业是通过一系列相对连续的可预测阶段出现的(Churchill & Lewis, 1983;加尔布雷斯,1982;Gartner & Starr, 1993)。另一种观点认为,妊娠期是创业活动的无序分类(Korunka, Frank, Lueger, & Mugler, 2003;Liao, Welsch & Tan, 2005),并指出创业活动时机的相对不重要(Carroll & Hannan, 2000)。因此,一些学者将一系列创业活动的完成程度判断为评估企业是否处于新兴状态的有用方法(如Block & MacMillan, 1985;Carter, Gartner, & Reynolds, 1996;Manolova, Edelman, Brush & Rotefoss, 2012)。然而,一系列启动活动导致新公司创建的点可能很难确定(Reynolds & Miller, 1992)。因此,在我们的研究中,我们采用了主张将一系列创业活动的成就量化作为衡量企业涌现的方法的观点。企业类型也可能对公司的新兴增长和轨迹产生影响,因为由单个企业家创办的公司内部的动态影响可能与由多个创始人创办的公司内部的动态影响不同。同样,由非家庭成员组成的团队创建的初创公司可能以不同于由家庭成员创建的公司的方式出现。我们的总体兴趣在于更好地理解企业在孕育期出现的时间动态,并帮助确定那些具有大幅增长轨迹的新公司的独特之处。在本研究中,我们考察了不同企业类型的企业涌现的增长和变化。在这项调查中,我们被研究问题所引导:创业公司在创业过程中是否在公司涌现水平(即完成的创业活动数量)和基于同伴群体关联的涌现变化轨迹的时间变化方面有所不同?为了探讨这个问题,我们对以下一系列调查问题提出了假设,这些问题考察了企业随时间的涌现水平、涌现变化轨迹的时间变化,并确定企业涌现变化是否因企业群体而异。为了验证我们的假设,我们开发了纵向模型,通过使用从创业动力小组研究II (PSED II)中提取的样本,通过检查公司在妊娠期的连续测量来探测涌现动力学,PSED II是一个在创业的不同阶段的美国个人数据库。我们的研究有助于以相关和重要的方式促进对创业与家族企业关系研究的学术兴趣。在过去的几年里,对创业团队的理解有所增长,但关于由家庭成员组成的创业团队的文献有限。此外,相对于它们的重要性,很少有信息将新生的个体企业家与非家族和家族企业创业团队的坚定孕育过程进行比较。我们通过对新生公司的时间动态进行建模,关注一系列创业活动的完成情况,以深入了解创业公司是如何随着时间的推移而出现的,并使研究人员能够更好地为后续研究开发有充分信息的问题。因此,我们的研究也有助于理解妊娠期,这是创业过程中的关键阶段。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Temporal Dynamics of Firm Emergence by Team Composition: Examining Top-Performing Solo, Family, and Team-Based Startups
IntroductionFirm emergence is the "the temporal sequence of events or activities that occur as entrepreneurs create a new business" (Liao & Welsch, 2008) and includes the types of venture creation actions that all nascent entrepreneurs initiate in attempting to launch a firm, such as: obtaining resources, developing new products, seeking funding, and making sales. Yet, the temporal dynamics of firms during this gestation period are not well understood. Some scholars have argued that firms emerge through a relatively sequential series of somewhat predictable phases (Churchill & Lewis, 1983; Galbraith, 1982; Gartner & Starr, 1993). An alternative perspective argues that the gestation period is a disorganized assortment of startup activities (Korunka, Frank, Lueger, & Mugler, 2003; Liao, Welsch & Tan, 2005) and point to the relative insignificance of startup activity timing (Carroll & Hannan, 2000). As a result, some scholars judge the completion of a series of startup activities a useful method by which to evaluate whether firms are emerging (e.g. Block & MacMillan, 1985; Carter, Gartner, & Reynolds, 1996; Manolova, Edelman, Brush & Rotefoss, 2012). Yet, the point at which a series of startup activities results in the creation of a new firm can be difficult to determine (Reynolds & Miller, 1992). As a result, in our study, we adopt the view that advocates for quantifying the achievement of a succession of startup activities as the method by which to gauge firm emergence. The type of enterprise may also have bearing on firms' emergent growth and trajectory, as the dynamics at play within firms started by individual entrepreneurs may impact firm emergence differently than within those firms started by a plurality of founders. Similarly, startups founded by teams composed of non-family members may emerge in a different manner than those started within families. Our overall interest lies in developing a better understanding of the temporal dynamics of firm emergence during the gestation period, and to help identify what is unique about those new firms with a substantial growth trajectory.In this study, we examine the growth and variation in firm emergence by enterprise type. In this investigation we are led by the research question: Do startups differ in their venture creation process in terms of the levels of firm emergence (i.e. the number of startup activities completed) and in the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory based on peer group association? To explore this issue, we develop hypotheses for the following sequence of investigative questions that examine the levels of firm emergence over time, the temporal variation of the emergent change trajectory, and determine if the firm emergent change differs for groups of firms.To test our hypotheses, we develop longitudinal models that probe the dynamics of emergence by examining firms' successive measurements during the gestation period using a sample drawn from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics II (PSED II), a database of US-based individuals in various stages of starting a firm.Our study helps to contribute to an increasing scholarly interest in research that lies at the nexus of entrepreneurship and family business in pertinent and significant ways. An understanding of entrepreneurial teams has grown in the past several years, yet the literature on entrepreneurial teams comprised of family members is limited. In addition, relative to their importance, there is scant information that compares the firm gestation process of nascent solo entrepreneurs, with that of non-family and family business startup teams. We focus on the completion of a series of startup activities by modeling the temporal dynamics of nascent firms to provide insight into how startups emerge over time, and to allow researchers to better develop well-informed questions for subsequent study. Therefore, our study also contributes to understanding of the gestation period, a critical phase in the startup process. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信