{"title":"发热性中性粒细胞减少合并实体瘤的患者很少有铜绿假单胞菌感染,较高的抗菌剂量没有较低剂量的疗效","authors":"R. Bitar","doi":"10.5430/JST.V6N1P94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many febrile neutropenic patients (FNP) with solid tumors receive high dose antibacterial therapy adequate forP. aeruginosa infections. This study was designed to determine the frequency of P. aeruginosa infections in FNP with solidneoplasms and detect any differences in duration of fever, length of stay (LOS) and deaths of patients receiving low (LD) vs. highdose (HD) antibacterial therapy. Methods: Electronic medical record databases were searched to identify patients with drug-induced neutropenia and fever. Theresulting data was searched manually for patients with solid neoplasms and these charts were selected consecutively for manualreview for additional inclusion criteria, comparison characteristics, such as type of neoplasm, comorbidities, potential risk factorssuch as duration of neutropenia, documented infections, and outcomes: duration of temperature to < 37.5℃ and < 38℃ , lengthof stay (LOS), and cause of death. Components of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care of Cancer risk index(MASCCRI) were extracted and the index was calculated for each episode. Results: The respective outcomes of LD vs. HD were: mean duration of temperature to < 38℃, 3 vs. 3 days, and to < 37.5℃, 4vs. 4 days, mean LOS 6.3 vs. 6.6 days (p = .56, TT; but p < .01, WRST), and LOS 10 days , 90% vs. 89%, Zero vs. 2 developedP. aeruginosa infections. Conclusions: LD antibacterials for FNP with solid neoplasms did not prolong the time to afebrile or the LOS, and only 2 P.aeruginosa infections occurred. High dose antibacterial therapy may not be necessary for FNP with solid neoplasms.","PeriodicalId":17174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Tumors","volume":"28 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Febrile neutropenic patients with solid neoplasms have few P. aeruginosa infections and higher antibacterial doses showed no benefit over lower doses\",\"authors\":\"R. Bitar\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/JST.V6N1P94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Many febrile neutropenic patients (FNP) with solid tumors receive high dose antibacterial therapy adequate forP. aeruginosa infections. This study was designed to determine the frequency of P. aeruginosa infections in FNP with solidneoplasms and detect any differences in duration of fever, length of stay (LOS) and deaths of patients receiving low (LD) vs. highdose (HD) antibacterial therapy. Methods: Electronic medical record databases were searched to identify patients with drug-induced neutropenia and fever. Theresulting data was searched manually for patients with solid neoplasms and these charts were selected consecutively for manualreview for additional inclusion criteria, comparison characteristics, such as type of neoplasm, comorbidities, potential risk factorssuch as duration of neutropenia, documented infections, and outcomes: duration of temperature to < 37.5℃ and < 38℃ , lengthof stay (LOS), and cause of death. Components of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care of Cancer risk index(MASCCRI) were extracted and the index was calculated for each episode. Results: The respective outcomes of LD vs. HD were: mean duration of temperature to < 38℃, 3 vs. 3 days, and to < 37.5℃, 4vs. 4 days, mean LOS 6.3 vs. 6.6 days (p = .56, TT; but p < .01, WRST), and LOS 10 days , 90% vs. 89%, Zero vs. 2 developedP. aeruginosa infections. Conclusions: LD antibacterials for FNP with solid neoplasms did not prolong the time to afebrile or the LOS, and only 2 P.aeruginosa infections occurred. High dose antibacterial therapy may not be necessary for FNP with solid neoplasms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solid Tumors\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solid Tumors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V6N1P94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V6N1P94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多发热性中性粒细胞减少患者(FNP)合并实体瘤接受足够的高剂量抗菌治疗。绿脓杆菌感染。本研究旨在确定伴有固体性肿瘤的FNP患者铜绿假单胞菌感染的频率,并检测接受低剂量(LD)与高剂量(HD)抗菌治疗的患者在发烧持续时间、住院时间(LOS)和死亡人数方面的差异。方法:检索电子病历数据库,对药物性中性粒细胞减少和发热患者进行识别。对实体肿瘤患者的数据进行人工检索,并连续选择这些图表进行人工审查,以获得额外的纳入标准、比较特征,如肿瘤类型、合并症、潜在危险因素,如中性粒细胞减少持续时间、记录的感染,以及结果:温度< 37.5℃和< 38℃的持续时间、住院时间(LOS)和死亡原因。提取多国癌症支持治疗协会风险指数(MASCCRI)的组成部分,并计算每个事件的指数。结果:LD与HD的结果分别为:平均温度降至< 38℃持续时间3天vs. 3天,降至< 37.5℃持续时间4天。4天,平均LOS 6.3天和6.6天(p = 0.56, TT;但p < 0.01, WRST)和LOS 10天,90% vs 89%, 0 vs 2发展p。绿脓杆菌感染。结论:对于合并实体瘤的FNP患者,使用LD抗菌药不延长其发热时间和LOS,仅发生2例铜绿假单胞菌感染。对于伴有实体肿瘤的FNP可能不需要大剂量抗菌治疗。
Febrile neutropenic patients with solid neoplasms have few P. aeruginosa infections and higher antibacterial doses showed no benefit over lower doses
Background: Many febrile neutropenic patients (FNP) with solid tumors receive high dose antibacterial therapy adequate forP. aeruginosa infections. This study was designed to determine the frequency of P. aeruginosa infections in FNP with solidneoplasms and detect any differences in duration of fever, length of stay (LOS) and deaths of patients receiving low (LD) vs. highdose (HD) antibacterial therapy. Methods: Electronic medical record databases were searched to identify patients with drug-induced neutropenia and fever. Theresulting data was searched manually for patients with solid neoplasms and these charts were selected consecutively for manualreview for additional inclusion criteria, comparison characteristics, such as type of neoplasm, comorbidities, potential risk factorssuch as duration of neutropenia, documented infections, and outcomes: duration of temperature to < 37.5℃ and < 38℃ , lengthof stay (LOS), and cause of death. Components of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care of Cancer risk index(MASCCRI) were extracted and the index was calculated for each episode. Results: The respective outcomes of LD vs. HD were: mean duration of temperature to < 38℃, 3 vs. 3 days, and to < 37.5℃, 4vs. 4 days, mean LOS 6.3 vs. 6.6 days (p = .56, TT; but p < .01, WRST), and LOS 10 days , 90% vs. 89%, Zero vs. 2 developedP. aeruginosa infections. Conclusions: LD antibacterials for FNP with solid neoplasms did not prolong the time to afebrile or the LOS, and only 2 P.aeruginosa infections occurred. High dose antibacterial therapy may not be necessary for FNP with solid neoplasms.