构建多项选择题来衡量高阶思维

Q2 Social Sciences
Darina Scully
{"title":"构建多项选择题来衡量高阶思维","authors":"Darina Scully","doi":"10.7275/CA7Y-MM27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of \nassessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption \nis that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however, \nempirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical \nrecommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.","PeriodicalId":20361,"journal":{"name":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking\",\"authors\":\"Darina Scully\",\"doi\":\"10.7275/CA7Y-MM27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of \\nassessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption \\nis that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however, \\nempirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical \\nrecommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7275/CA7Y-MM27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7275/CA7Y-MM27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

在教育、认证和执照方面,不断有人呼吁开发针对高阶思维的评估,而不仅仅是对事实的回忆。一个常见的假设是,这需要使用建构式回答或文章式的测试问题;然而,经验证据表明,情况可能并非如此。本文认为,多项选择题具有评估某些高阶技能的能力。此外,本文还提供了一系列实用的建议,供测试开发人员有目的地构建这样的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking
Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of assessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption is that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however, empirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical recommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信