{"title":"构建多项选择题来衡量高阶思维","authors":"Darina Scully","doi":"10.7275/CA7Y-MM27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of \nassessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption \nis that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however, \nempirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical \nrecommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.","PeriodicalId":20361,"journal":{"name":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking\",\"authors\":\"Darina Scully\",\"doi\":\"10.7275/CA7Y-MM27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of \\nassessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption \\nis that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however, \\nempirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical \\nrecommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7275/CA7Y-MM27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7275/CA7Y-MM27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Constructing multiple-choice items to measure higher-order thinking
Across education, certification and licensure, there are repeated calls for the development of
assessments that target higher-order thinking, as opposed to mere recall of facts. A common assumption
is that this necessitates the use of constructed response or essay-style test questions; however,
empirical evidence suggests that this may not be the case. In this paper, it is argued that multiplechoice items have the capacity to assess certain higher-order skills. In addition, a series of practical
recommendations for test developers seeking to purposefully construct such items is provided.