冠状病毒危机期间欧盟劳动力市场的可持续性

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Viktor I. Shcherbyna, K. Kutsovol, V. Polozhyshnyk, Nadiya O. Babych, Oleksandra V. Voytsyshena
{"title":"冠状病毒危机期间欧盟劳动力市场的可持续性","authors":"Viktor I. Shcherbyna, K. Kutsovol, V. Polozhyshnyk, Nadiya O. Babych, Oleksandra V. Voytsyshena","doi":"10.35784/pe.2023.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to explore the differences that exist between the exercise of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers under EU law, and to examine the existing differences between these categories under international law. The leading method of research used in the article is the method of comparison. It was used to analyze the differences in the legal regulation and implementation of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers in the EU. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the definition and legal regulation of the terms refugee and migrant worker. The author defines the classification of types of migration and proves the conclusion that economic motives are the most frequent reason for migration. At the same time, the author argues that refugees and labor migrants are different concepts in terms of labor legislation. Therefore, they have different legal status and, accordingly, different frameworks for exercising their rights. Besides, the author as an example considered Polish legislation, which regulates both the issues of labor migration and realization of labor rights of refugees, especially in the context of war in Ukraine, which is also reflected in the results of work and conclusions to the article. The materials obtained as a result of the study can be used in law-making activities to improve the national labor legislation of Ukraine on the example of the considered legal acts, as well as taking into account the European vector of development of Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of EU Labour Markets During the Coronavirus Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Viktor I. Shcherbyna, K. Kutsovol, V. Polozhyshnyk, Nadiya O. Babych, Oleksandra V. Voytsyshena\",\"doi\":\"10.35784/pe.2023.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to explore the differences that exist between the exercise of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers under EU law, and to examine the existing differences between these categories under international law. The leading method of research used in the article is the method of comparison. It was used to analyze the differences in the legal regulation and implementation of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers in the EU. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the definition and legal regulation of the terms refugee and migrant worker. The author defines the classification of types of migration and proves the conclusion that economic motives are the most frequent reason for migration. At the same time, the author argues that refugees and labor migrants are different concepts in terms of labor legislation. Therefore, they have different legal status and, accordingly, different frameworks for exercising their rights. Besides, the author as an example considered Polish legislation, which regulates both the issues of labor migration and realization of labor rights of refugees, especially in the context of war in Ukraine, which is also reflected in the results of work and conclusions to the article. The materials obtained as a result of the study can be used in law-making activities to improve the national labor legislation of Ukraine on the example of the considered legal acts, as well as taking into account the European vector of development of Ukraine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨难民和移民工人在欧盟法律下行使工作权之间存在的差异,并研究国际法下这两类之间存在的差异。本文采用的主要研究方法是比较法。分析了难民和移民工人在欧盟工作权的法律规制和实施方面的差异。本文分析了难民和农民工这两个术语的定义和法律规定的特殊性。作者界定了移民类型的分类,并证明了经济动机是最常见的移民原因的结论。同时,笔者认为难民与劳务移民在劳动立法上是不同的概念。因此,他们具有不同的法律地位,相应地,行使其权利的框架也不同。此外,笔者还以波兰的立法为例,对劳工移民问题和难民劳工权利的实现进行了规范,特别是在乌克兰战争的背景下,这也反映在本文的工作结果和结论中。研究获得的材料可用于立法活动,以审议的法律行为为例,改进乌克兰的国家劳工立法,并考虑到乌克兰的欧洲发展载体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability of EU Labour Markets During the Coronavirus Crisis
The purpose of this article is to explore the differences that exist between the exercise of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers under EU law, and to examine the existing differences between these categories under international law. The leading method of research used in the article is the method of comparison. It was used to analyze the differences in the legal regulation and implementation of the right to work by refugees and migrant workers in the EU. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the definition and legal regulation of the terms refugee and migrant worker. The author defines the classification of types of migration and proves the conclusion that economic motives are the most frequent reason for migration. At the same time, the author argues that refugees and labor migrants are different concepts in terms of labor legislation. Therefore, they have different legal status and, accordingly, different frameworks for exercising their rights. Besides, the author as an example considered Polish legislation, which regulates both the issues of labor migration and realization of labor rights of refugees, especially in the context of war in Ukraine, which is also reflected in the results of work and conclusions to the article. The materials obtained as a result of the study can be used in law-making activities to improve the national labor legislation of Ukraine on the example of the considered legal acts, as well as taking into account the European vector of development of Ukraine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信