候选人诉政党:初选投票准入法的宪法限制

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
N. Persily
{"title":"候选人诉政党:初选投票准入法的宪法限制","authors":"N. Persily","doi":"10.7916/D8PN9G3B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"peculiarities uncertainties in primary ballot access cases, constitutionality in the abstract. The position of the primary in the overall electoral scheme, the type of office for which the primary is nominating candidates, and the nature of the state or party interests used to justify the law will all bear on whether a given set of rules violates voter or candidate rights. Because the current case law is hampered by uncomfortable analogies to general election ballot access cases or other party autonomy or freedom of association cases, much work remains to be done in constructing a coherent jurisprudence of primary ballot access. Although several of the ideas expressed in this Article must be tagged thought experiments given the treacherous directions toward which they might lead, I hope they provide a starting point for such a discussion.","PeriodicalId":47702,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"2181-2225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Candidates v. Parties: The Constitutional Constraints on Primary Ballot Access Laws\",\"authors\":\"N. Persily\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8PN9G3B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"peculiarities uncertainties in primary ballot access cases, constitutionality in the abstract. The position of the primary in the overall electoral scheme, the type of office for which the primary is nominating candidates, and the nature of the state or party interests used to justify the law will all bear on whether a given set of rules violates voter or candidate rights. Because the current case law is hampered by uncomfortable analogies to general election ballot access cases or other party autonomy or freedom of association cases, much work remains to be done in constructing a coherent jurisprudence of primary ballot access. Although several of the ideas expressed in this Article must be tagged thought experiments given the treacherous directions toward which they might lead, I hope they provide a starting point for such a discussion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2181-2225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8PN9G3B\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8PN9G3B","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

初选投票的特殊性和不确定性,抽象的合宪性。初选在整个选举计划中的地位,初选提名候选人的职位类型,以及用来证明法律正当性的州或政党利益的性质,都将影响一套特定规则是否侵犯了选民或候选人的权利。由于现行判例法受到与大选投票权案件或其他政党自治或结社自由案件令人不安的类比的阻碍,在构建一个连贯的初选投票权判例方面仍有许多工作要做。尽管本文中表达的一些观点必须被贴上思想实验的标签,因为它们可能会导致危险的方向,但我希望它们能为这样的讨论提供一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Candidates v. Parties: The Constitutional Constraints on Primary Ballot Access Laws
peculiarities uncertainties in primary ballot access cases, constitutionality in the abstract. The position of the primary in the overall electoral scheme, the type of office for which the primary is nominating candidates, and the nature of the state or party interests used to justify the law will all bear on whether a given set of rules violates voter or candidate rights. Because the current case law is hampered by uncomfortable analogies to general election ballot access cases or other party autonomy or freedom of association cases, much work remains to be done in constructing a coherent jurisprudence of primary ballot access. Although several of the ideas expressed in this Article must be tagged thought experiments given the treacherous directions toward which they might lead, I hope they provide a starting point for such a discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Georgetown Law Journal is headquartered at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C. and has since its inception published more than 500 issues, as well as the widely-used Annual Review of Criminal Procedure (ARCP). The Journal is currently, and always has been, run by law students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信