校园性行为不端正当程序保护

IF 3.3 3区生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Channels Pub Date : 2016-11-22 DOI:10.15385/JCH.2016.1.1.2

C. Kirkpatrick

{"title":"校园性行为不端正当程序保护","authors":"C. Kirkpatrick","doi":"10.15385/JCH.2016.1.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the present state of institutional discipline regarding sexual assaults on campus and the impact of the April 4, 2011 “Dear Colleague Letter” (DCL) issued by the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education on this problem. The paper then discusses the applicable Title IX standards and the procedural due process rights for the accused in campus sexual assault cases. The paper explores colleges’ responses to the DCL and means for redress for the accused under Title IX. The author argues that the DCL improperly incentivizes colleges to convict the accused, and suggests that cases of sexual assault on university campuses should be referred to courts to secure proper due process rights for both the accused and the accuser.","PeriodicalId":9750,"journal":{"name":"Channels","volume":"2020 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Campus Sexual Misconduct Due Process Protections\",\"authors\":\"C. Kirkpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.15385/JCH.2016.1.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the present state of institutional discipline regarding sexual assaults on campus and the impact of the April 4, 2011 “Dear Colleague Letter” (DCL) issued by the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education on this problem. The paper then discusses the applicable Title IX standards and the procedural due process rights for the accused in campus sexual assault cases. The paper explores colleges’ responses to the DCL and means for redress for the accused under Title IX. The author argues that the DCL improperly incentivizes colleges to convict the accused, and suggests that cases of sexual assault on university campuses should be referred to courts to secure proper due process rights for both the accused and the accuser.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Channels\",\"volume\":\"2020 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Channels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15385/JCH.2016.1.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Channels","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15385/JCH.2016.1.1.2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文探讨了目前关于校园性侵犯的制度纪律状况，以及2011年4月4日由教育部民权办公室发布的“致同事信”(DCL)对这一问题的影响。然后，本文讨论了在校园性侵犯案件中适用的第九条标准和被告的程序正当程序权利。本文探讨了大学对DCL的回应以及根据第九条为被告提供补救的手段。作者认为，DCL不恰当地鼓励大学对被告定罪，并建议大学校园性侵犯案件应提交法院，以确保被告和原告都享有适当的正当程序权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Campus Sexual Misconduct Due Process Protections

This paper explores the present state of institutional discipline regarding sexual assaults on campus and the impact of the April 4, 2011 “Dear Colleague Letter” (DCL) issued by the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education on this problem. The paper then discusses the applicable Title IX standards and the procedural due process rights for the accused in campus sexual assault cases. The paper explores colleges’ responses to the DCL and means for redress for the accused under Title IX. The author argues that the DCL improperly incentivizes colleges to convict the accused, and suggests that cases of sexual assault on university campuses should be referred to courts to secure proper due process rights for both the accused and the accuser.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Channels 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Channels is an open access journal for all aspects of ion channel research. The journal publishes high quality papers that shed new light on ion channel and ion transporter/exchanger function, structure, biophysics, pharmacology, and regulation in health and disease. Channels welcomes interdisciplinary approaches that address ion channel physiology in areas such as neuroscience, cardiovascular sciences, cancer research, endocrinology, and gastroenterology. Our aim is to foster communication among the ion channel and transporter communities and facilitate the advancement of the field.