时间对社交媒体用户概况和推荐研究人员的影响

Chifumi Nishioka, Gregor Große-Bölting, A. Scherp
{"title":"时间对社交媒体用户概况和推荐研究人员的影响","authors":"Chifumi Nishioka, Gregor Große-Bölting, A. Scherp","doi":"10.1145/2809563.2809601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conduct two experiments to compare different scoring functions for extracted user interests and measure the influence of using older data. We apply our experiments in the domains of computer science and medicine. The first experiment assesses similarity scores between a user's social media profile and a corresponding user's publication profile, in order to evaluate to which extend a user's social media profile reflects his or her professional interests. The second experiment recommends related researchers profiled by their publications based on a user's social media profile. The result revealed that while the functions using spreading activation produce large similarity scores between a user profile and publication profile, the scoring functions with statistical methods (e.g., an extension of BM25 with spreading activation) perform best for recommendation. In terms of the temporal influence, the older data have almost no influence on the performance in the medicine dataset. However, in the computer science dataset, while there is a positive influence in the first experiment, the second experiment demonstrated a negative influence when adding too old data.","PeriodicalId":20526,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of time on user profiling and recommending researchers in social media\",\"authors\":\"Chifumi Nishioka, Gregor Große-Bölting, A. Scherp\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2809563.2809601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conduct two experiments to compare different scoring functions for extracted user interests and measure the influence of using older data. We apply our experiments in the domains of computer science and medicine. The first experiment assesses similarity scores between a user's social media profile and a corresponding user's publication profile, in order to evaluate to which extend a user's social media profile reflects his or her professional interests. The second experiment recommends related researchers profiled by their publications based on a user's social media profile. The result revealed that while the functions using spreading activation produce large similarity scores between a user profile and publication profile, the scoring functions with statistical methods (e.g., an extension of BM25 with spreading activation) perform best for recommendation. In terms of the temporal influence, the older data have almost no influence on the performance in the medicine dataset. However, in the computer science dataset, while there is a positive influence in the first experiment, the second experiment demonstrated a negative influence when adding too old data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们进行了两个实验来比较不同的评分函数对提取的用户兴趣和衡量使用旧数据的影响。我们将实验应用于计算机科学和医学领域。第一个实验评估用户的社交媒体资料与相应用户的出版物资料之间的相似性得分,以评估用户的社交媒体资料在多大程度上反映了他或她的专业兴趣。第二个实验是根据用户的社交媒体资料,根据他们的出版物推荐相关研究人员。结果表明,虽然使用传播激活的函数在用户配置文件和出版物配置文件之间产生较大的相似性得分,但使用统计方法(例如,扩展BM25与传播激活)的评分函数在推荐方面表现最好。就时间影响而言,旧数据对医学数据集的性能几乎没有影响。然而,在计算机科学数据集中,虽然在第一个实验中有积极的影响,但在第二个实验中,当添加太旧的数据时,显示出负面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of time on user profiling and recommending researchers in social media
We conduct two experiments to compare different scoring functions for extracted user interests and measure the influence of using older data. We apply our experiments in the domains of computer science and medicine. The first experiment assesses similarity scores between a user's social media profile and a corresponding user's publication profile, in order to evaluate to which extend a user's social media profile reflects his or her professional interests. The second experiment recommends related researchers profiled by their publications based on a user's social media profile. The result revealed that while the functions using spreading activation produce large similarity scores between a user profile and publication profile, the scoring functions with statistical methods (e.g., an extension of BM25 with spreading activation) perform best for recommendation. In terms of the temporal influence, the older data have almost no influence on the performance in the medicine dataset. However, in the computer science dataset, while there is a positive influence in the first experiment, the second experiment demonstrated a negative influence when adding too old data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信