美国新建单户住宅销售量下降的原因分析

Q3 Social Sciences
A. Çetin, J. Kole
{"title":"美国新建单户住宅销售量下降的原因分析","authors":"A. Çetin, J. Kole","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS11317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for \neconomy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five \nyears ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic \ndecline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the \ndecline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new \nprivately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate, \nreal personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results \nindicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family \nhouses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all \nother variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it \ndoesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not \nsignificant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For \nthe population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value \nindicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this \nnegative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has \nsignificant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or \nlower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the \nnumber of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of \nstatistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1% \nlevel; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal \nincomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant \nat 10% level. \nKeywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases, \nhouse price index","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":"134 1","pages":"185-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Factors Which Caused the Decline in the Amount of the Newly One Family Houses Sold in US\",\"authors\":\"A. Çetin, J. Kole\",\"doi\":\"10.14706/JECOSS11317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for \\neconomy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five \\nyears ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic \\ndecline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the \\ndecline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new \\nprivately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate, \\nreal personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results \\nindicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family \\nhouses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all \\nother variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it \\ndoesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not \\nsignificant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For \\nthe population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value \\nindicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this \\nnegative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has \\nsignificant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or \\nlower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the \\nnumber of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of \\nstatistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1% \\nlevel; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal \\nincomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant \\nat 10% level. \\nKeywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases, \\nhouse price index\",\"PeriodicalId\":52427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"185-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新私人拥有的一户住宅销售(C25)被认为是经济的重要指标。2011年2月的月度数据为25万套房屋销售。与5年前相比,2006年为106.1万名,减少了76%。C25数量急剧下降的原因是什么?本文的目的是分析影响美国C25数量下降的因素。因此,在本研究中,因变量为新售出的私人独户住宅。自变量包括30年期抵押贷款利率、实际个人收入、失业率、人口、房价指数。结果表明,利率每提高1%,私人独栋住宅的新销售量就会减少2万套。当失业率上升1%时,在其他变量不变的情况下,新的私人独户住宅的销售量减少了8.1万套。我们认为价格上涨需求就会下降。但它不适合这项研究。收入与房屋销售呈正相关,但不显著。结果表明,实际个人收入与失业率具有较高的相关性。对于总体变量,系数是一个负数。尽管p值表明这个结果不显著,但我们仍然无法找出这种负相关的原因。每月虚拟测试结果表明,没有一个月有显著的影响。然而,从3月到7月,这些月份的斜率具有正或较低的负影响。因此,不可能确定影响新房销售量的所有原因,因为许多因素是相互关联的。然而,通过我们的一系列统计检验,我们可以得出结论,当前抵押贷款利率在1%的水平上是显著的;滞后一期抵押贷款利率在5%水平上显著;滞后一个时间段的实际个人收入和滞后两个时间段的失业率在10%的水平上都是显著的。关键词:房屋销售,抵押贷款利率,收入水平,失业率,人口增长,房价指数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Factors Which Caused the Decline in the Amount of the Newly One Family Houses Sold in US
The new privately owned one-family house sold (C25) is recognized as great indicator for economy. The monthly data in February 2011 was 250,000 houses sold. Compared to five years ago, 1,061,000 in 2006 were decreased by 76%. What are the causes to the dramatic decline of number of C25? The purpose of this paper is to analyze factors that determine the decline of number of C25 in US. Therefore, in this study, dependent variable is the new privately owned one-family house sold. Independent variables include 30 years mortgage rate, real personal income, unemployment rate, population, and house price index. The results indicate when the interest rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases by 20 thousand. When the unemployment rate increases 1%, the number of new privately owned one-family houses sold decreases 81 thousand, holding all other variables constant. We thought when price goes up the demand should go down. But it doesn’t fit in this study. Income and house sold have positive relationship but it’s not significant. It shows that real personal income and unemployment have a high correlation. For the population variable, the coefficient is a negative number. Even though the p-value indicates that this result is not significant, we still couldn’t figure out the cause of this negative relation. The result of monthly dummy test indicates that none of the months has significant effects. However, from March to July the slopes of the months have positive or lower negative effects. Consequently, it’s impossible to determine all the causes to the number of new house sold since many factors are interrelated. However, through our series of statistical tests, we could be able to conclude that current mortgage rate is significant at 1% level; mortgage rate at lag one time period is significant at 5% level; both real personal incomes at lag one time period and unemployment rate at lag two time period are significant at 10% level. Keywords: house sold, mortgage rate, income level, unemployment rate, population increases, house price index
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信