传统灯泡熄灯:游说和政府干预

Q4 Social Sciences
Mikael Kevin Kierkegaard
{"title":"传统灯泡熄灯:游说和政府干预","authors":"Mikael Kevin Kierkegaard","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.062986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On September 1, 2012, the final phase of the European legislation banning the incandescent light bulbs came into effect in the EU. However, the ban has encountered criticisms. Consumers have not internalised the benefits of replacing the classic bulbs. People opposed to the ban deplore government interference with free market. In dimming the classic light bulbs, the EU has been accused of keeping people in the dark during the consultation process and has not been forthright with the public and the Parliament concerning the validity of the data. One of the main questions this author wants to explore is the issue of whether the policy intervention has produced welfare benefits and innovation. Was the intervention justified? What type of discontinuance problems arose after the ban? These are questions that will be explored in this paper and are intended to understand the dynamic effects of policy intervention in energy efficiency.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lights out for traditional bulbs: lobbyism and government intervention\",\"authors\":\"Mikael Kevin Kierkegaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2014.062986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On September 1, 2012, the final phase of the European legislation banning the incandescent light bulbs came into effect in the EU. However, the ban has encountered criticisms. Consumers have not internalised the benefits of replacing the classic bulbs. People opposed to the ban deplore government interference with free market. In dimming the classic light bulbs, the EU has been accused of keeping people in the dark during the consultation process and has not been forthright with the public and the Parliament concerning the validity of the data. One of the main questions this author wants to explore is the issue of whether the policy intervention has produced welfare benefits and innovation. Was the intervention justified? What type of discontinuance problems arose after the ban? These are questions that will be explored in this paper and are intended to understand the dynamic effects of policy intervention in energy efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.062986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.062986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2012年9月1日,欧盟禁止白炽灯泡立法的最后阶段在欧盟生效。然而,这项禁令遭到了批评。消费者还没有意识到更换传统灯泡的好处。反对该禁令的人谴责政府干预自由市场。在调暗传统灯泡的过程中,欧盟被指责在咨询过程中让人们处于黑暗之中,并且在数据的有效性方面对公众和议会没有直言不讳。笔者想探讨的一个主要问题是政策干预是否产生了福利效益和创新。干预是合理的吗?禁令后出现了哪些类型的中止问题?这些都是本文将探讨的问题,旨在了解政策干预对能源效率的动态影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lights out for traditional bulbs: lobbyism and government intervention
On September 1, 2012, the final phase of the European legislation banning the incandescent light bulbs came into effect in the EU. However, the ban has encountered criticisms. Consumers have not internalised the benefits of replacing the classic bulbs. People opposed to the ban deplore government interference with free market. In dimming the classic light bulbs, the EU has been accused of keeping people in the dark during the consultation process and has not been forthright with the public and the Parliament concerning the validity of the data. One of the main questions this author wants to explore is the issue of whether the policy intervention has produced welfare benefits and innovation. Was the intervention justified? What type of discontinuance problems arose after the ban? These are questions that will be explored in this paper and are intended to understand the dynamic effects of policy intervention in energy efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信