智障人士的脆弱性概念和政治包容

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Bernard Gagnon , Olivier Clément-Sainte-Marie
{"title":"智障人士的脆弱性概念和政治包容","authors":"Bernard Gagnon ,&nbsp;Olivier Clément-Sainte-Marie","doi":"10.1016/j.alter.2019.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electoral system reforms in liberal democracies have allowed people with intellectual disabilities, historically stripped of their citizenship, to exercise their political rights. Inspired by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, many national governments have extended the principle of the universal right to vote to persons with intellectual disabilities, despite some institutional resistance. Different approaches in ethics and political theory have offered justifications for these electoral reforms, but they are divided on the question of the skills required for the exercise of political rights and the constraints imposed by the intellectual abilities of certain people. The concept of vulnerability developed by Martha Fineman approaches the question differently by emphasizing the relational and collaborative dimensions of the citizenship institution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45156,"journal":{"name":"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.alter.2019.04.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le concept de vulnérabilité et l’inclusion politique des personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle\",\"authors\":\"Bernard Gagnon ,&nbsp;Olivier Clément-Sainte-Marie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alter.2019.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Electoral system reforms in liberal democracies have allowed people with intellectual disabilities, historically stripped of their citizenship, to exercise their political rights. Inspired by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, many national governments have extended the principle of the universal right to vote to persons with intellectual disabilities, despite some institutional resistance. Different approaches in ethics and political theory have offered justifications for these electoral reforms, but they are divided on the question of the skills required for the exercise of political rights and the constraints imposed by the intellectual abilities of certain people. The concept of vulnerability developed by Martha Fineman approaches the question differently by emphasizing the relational and collaborative dimensions of the citizenship institution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.alter.2019.04.004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875067218300798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alter-European Journal of Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875067218300798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自由民主国家的选举制度改革使历来被剥夺公民权的智障人士得以行使政治权利。受《残疾人权利公约》的启发,许多国家政府不顾一些制度上的阻力,将普遍投票权的原则扩展到智障人士。伦理学和政治理论的不同方法为这些选举改革提供了理由,但它们在行使政治权利所需的技能和某些人的智力能力所施加的限制的问题上存在分歧。Martha Fineman提出的脆弱性概念通过强调公民制度的关系和协作维度,以不同的方式处理了这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Le concept de vulnérabilité et l’inclusion politique des personnes ayant une déficience intellectuelle

Electoral system reforms in liberal democracies have allowed people with intellectual disabilities, historically stripped of their citizenship, to exercise their political rights. Inspired by the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, many national governments have extended the principle of the universal right to vote to persons with intellectual disabilities, despite some institutional resistance. Different approaches in ethics and political theory have offered justifications for these electoral reforms, but they are divided on the question of the skills required for the exercise of political rights and the constraints imposed by the intellectual abilities of certain people. The concept of vulnerability developed by Martha Fineman approaches the question differently by emphasizing the relational and collaborative dimensions of the citizenship institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ALTER is a peer-reviewed European journal which looks at disability and its variations. It is aimed at everyone who is involved or interested in this field. ALTER is an emblematic Latin word for all forms of difference, leaving open the question of their nature and expression. An inter-disciplinary journal First and foremost, interdisciplinarity means remaining open to all human and social sciences: sociology, anthropology, psychology, psychoanalysis, history, demography, epidemiology, economics, law, etc. It also means a connection between the different forms of knowledge - academic and fundamental - applied and relating to the experience of disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信