将法律实体从国家统一法律实体登记册中排除:使用案例、程序和后果

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
A. Gabov
{"title":"将法律实体从国家统一法律实体登记册中排除:使用案例、程序和后果","authors":"A. Gabov","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of research. In 2005, a new institution for exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities by decision of the registering authority (or, as it is also called \"administrative termination of a legal entity\"). Subsequently, as a result of a number of changes, including the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, introduced by federal laws in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2019, this institution was formed in the form in which it currently exists Its importance, at first more technical, has increased significantly after the changes in 2015, when this institution began to be used to conduct a large-scale \"cleaning\" of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities from inactive legal entities. As a result, millions of legal entities have been excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities in recent years. In addition, the range of situations in which this institution began to be applied has expanded. Accordingly, the increase in the number of disputes is due to the fact that such exclusion affects the rights and interests of many persons (creditors, participants of excluded legal entities, members of their governing bodies). These disputes have often been the subject of close attention of the Russian Constitutional Court (the latest example is the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of May 21, 2021 No. 20-P). The article examines the goals of this institution, its development, shows the most problematic situations related to the application of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, as well as formulate the main directions for changing this institution. The author's main scientific hypothesis is that during the development of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, its original goals were lost. New goals and meanings were also formulated (in the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation), which eventually (taking into account the significant shortcomings of the exclusion procedure itself) lead to violation of the rights of a significant number of interested persons. The author believes that in the development of this institution there is clearly a disproportion in terms of its application in relation to limited liability companies and persons controlling such a company. The author also notes the lack of a unified concept of the institution of exclusion from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, since along with the administrative procedure for the termination of legal personality, the legislation also recognizes the judicial procedure. Description of research methods and methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the use of methods of interpretation developed in the doctrine.The main results, scope of application. The goals of creating the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are established, the development of this institution is shown taking into account the legal positions of the Russian Constitutional Court, judicial practice, conceptual provisions on reforming civil legislation.Conclusions. There is a need for a complete renovation of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The main directions for improving the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are formulated.","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: cases of use, procedure and consequences\",\"authors\":\"A. Gabov\",\"doi\":\"10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of research. In 2005, a new institution for exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities by decision of the registering authority (or, as it is also called \\\"administrative termination of a legal entity\\\"). Subsequently, as a result of a number of changes, including the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, introduced by federal laws in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2019, this institution was formed in the form in which it currently exists Its importance, at first more technical, has increased significantly after the changes in 2015, when this institution began to be used to conduct a large-scale \\\"cleaning\\\" of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities from inactive legal entities. As a result, millions of legal entities have been excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities in recent years. In addition, the range of situations in which this institution began to be applied has expanded. Accordingly, the increase in the number of disputes is due to the fact that such exclusion affects the rights and interests of many persons (creditors, participants of excluded legal entities, members of their governing bodies). These disputes have often been the subject of close attention of the Russian Constitutional Court (the latest example is the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of May 21, 2021 No. 20-P). The article examines the goals of this institution, its development, shows the most problematic situations related to the application of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, as well as formulate the main directions for changing this institution. The author's main scientific hypothesis is that during the development of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, its original goals were lost. New goals and meanings were also formulated (in the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation), which eventually (taking into account the significant shortcomings of the exclusion procedure itself) lead to violation of the rights of a significant number of interested persons. The author believes that in the development of this institution there is clearly a disproportion in terms of its application in relation to limited liability companies and persons controlling such a company. The author also notes the lack of a unified concept of the institution of exclusion from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, since along with the administrative procedure for the termination of legal personality, the legislation also recognizes the judicial procedure. Description of research methods and methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the use of methods of interpretation developed in the doctrine.The main results, scope of application. The goals of creating the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are established, the development of this institution is shown taking into account the legal positions of the Russian Constitutional Court, judicial practice, conceptual provisions on reforming civil legislation.Conclusions. There is a need for a complete renovation of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The main directions for improving the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).204-230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的主题。2005年,通过注册机构的决定将法人实体从国家统一法人登记册中排除(或者,也称为“法人实体的行政终止”)的新制度。随后,由于一系列变化,包括2014年、2015年、2016年和2019年由联邦法律引入的《俄罗斯联邦民法典》,该机构以目前存在的形式形成。其重要性,最初更具技术性,在2015年的变化后显着增加,当时该机构开始用于对不活跃的法律实体进行大规模的“清理”国家统一法律实体登记册。因此,近年来,数以百万计的法律实体被排除在国家统一法律实体登记册之外。此外,这一制度开始适用的情况范围也扩大了。因此,纠纷数目的增加是由于这种排除影响到许多人(债权人、被排除在外的法律实体的参与者及其理事机构成员)的权利和利益。这些争议往往是俄罗斯宪法法院密切关注的主题(最新的例子是俄罗斯宪法法院2021年5月21日第20-P号决定)。本文考察了这一制度的目标,它的发展,显示了与法律实体从国家统一法律实体登记册中排除制度的适用有关的最成问题的情况。本文的目的是找出国家统一法人登记簿中法人排除制度存在的主要问题,并提出改变这一制度的主要方向。笔者的主要科学假设是,在国家法人统一登记制度的发展过程中,法人排除制度失去了最初的目标。(在俄罗斯联邦宪法法院的法律立场上)也制定了新的目标和意义,最终(考虑到排除程序本身的重大缺陷)导致侵犯了大量有关人士的权利。笔者认为,在这一制度的发展过程中,对于有限责任公司和控制有限责任公司的人来说,其适用显然存在着不均衡。作者还注意到,在《国家法人统一登记》中缺乏排除制度的统一概念,因为在规定终止法人资格的行政程序的同时,立法也承认司法程序。描述研究方法和方法论。研究是基于系统的分析,以及使用的解释方法在学说发展。主要成果,适用范围。确立了建立法人实体排除国家统一法人登记册制度的目标,并结合俄罗斯宪法法院的法律立场、司法实践、改革民事立法的概念性规定,说明了这一制度的发展。有必要彻底改革将法律实体排除在国家统一法律实体登记册之外的制度。提出了完善国家统一法人登记簿中法人排除制度的主要方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities: cases of use, procedure and consequences
The subject of research. In 2005, a new institution for exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities by decision of the registering authority (or, as it is also called "administrative termination of a legal entity"). Subsequently, as a result of a number of changes, including the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, introduced by federal laws in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2019, this institution was formed in the form in which it currently exists Its importance, at first more technical, has increased significantly after the changes in 2015, when this institution began to be used to conduct a large-scale "cleaning" of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities from inactive legal entities. As a result, millions of legal entities have been excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities in recent years. In addition, the range of situations in which this institution began to be applied has expanded. Accordingly, the increase in the number of disputes is due to the fact that such exclusion affects the rights and interests of many persons (creditors, participants of excluded legal entities, members of their governing bodies). These disputes have often been the subject of close attention of the Russian Constitutional Court (the latest example is the decision of the Russian Constitutional Court of May 21, 2021 No. 20-P). The article examines the goals of this institution, its development, shows the most problematic situations related to the application of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.The purpose of the article is to identify the main problems of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, as well as formulate the main directions for changing this institution. The author's main scientific hypothesis is that during the development of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, its original goals were lost. New goals and meanings were also formulated (in the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation), which eventually (taking into account the significant shortcomings of the exclusion procedure itself) lead to violation of the rights of a significant number of interested persons. The author believes that in the development of this institution there is clearly a disproportion in terms of its application in relation to limited liability companies and persons controlling such a company. The author also notes the lack of a unified concept of the institution of exclusion from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, since along with the administrative procedure for the termination of legal personality, the legislation also recognizes the judicial procedure. Description of research methods and methodology. The research is based on a systematic analysis, as well as the use of methods of interpretation developed in the doctrine.The main results, scope of application. The goals of creating the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are established, the development of this institution is shown taking into account the legal positions of the Russian Constitutional Court, judicial practice, conceptual provisions on reforming civil legislation.Conclusions. There is a need for a complete renovation of the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The main directions for improving the institution of exclusion of a legal entity from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities are formulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信