拆解政策组合:政策组合中工具使用的主要和次要方面

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
A. Bali, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh
{"title":"拆解政策组合:政策组合中工具使用的主要和次要方面","authors":"A. Bali, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1907653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A recent resurgence of interest in policy design has fostered renewed efforts to better understand how specific combinations of policy tools arise and shape policy outcomes. However, to date, these efforts have been stymied by under-theorization of the dif- ferent purposes to which tools are directed in policy mixes and a corresponding failure to acknowledge both these in conceptual work on the subject and in policy practice. Existing frameworks do not adequately recognize the complexity of contemporary policy tool mixes, especially their hybrid and multilayered features, and how procedural and substantial tools operate and interact together in priority and supportive roles. To close this gap, we propose a revised tool framework that distinguishes between first and second-order aspects of instruments used in policy mixes and highlights the particular salience of procedural tools within them.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"321 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking policy portfolios: primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes\",\"authors\":\"A. Bali, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17516234.2021.1907653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A recent resurgence of interest in policy design has fostered renewed efforts to better understand how specific combinations of policy tools arise and shape policy outcomes. However, to date, these efforts have been stymied by under-theorization of the dif- ferent purposes to which tools are directed in policy mixes and a corresponding failure to acknowledge both these in conceptual work on the subject and in policy practice. Existing frameworks do not adequately recognize the complexity of contemporary policy tool mixes, especially their hybrid and multilayered features, and how procedural and substantial tools operate and interact together in priority and supportive roles. To close this gap, we propose a revised tool framework that distinguishes between first and second-order aspects of instruments used in policy mixes and highlights the particular salience of procedural tools within them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"321 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1907653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1907653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

最近对政策设计的兴趣重新抬头,促使人们重新努力更好地理解政策工具的具体组合是如何产生和塑造政策结果的。然而,迄今为止,这些努力一直受到阻碍,原因是对政策混合中工具所指向的不同目的的理论化不足,以及在有关该主题的概念工作和政策实践中相应地未能承认这些目的。现有框架没有充分认识到当代政策工具组合的复杂性,特别是其混合和多层特征,以及程序性和实质性工具如何在优先和支持作用中相互作用和相互作用。为了缩小这一差距,我们提出了一个修订后的工具框架,区分政策组合中使用的工具的一级和二级方面,并强调其中程序工具的特别突出性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking policy portfolios: primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes
ABSTRACT A recent resurgence of interest in policy design has fostered renewed efforts to better understand how specific combinations of policy tools arise and shape policy outcomes. However, to date, these efforts have been stymied by under-theorization of the dif- ferent purposes to which tools are directed in policy mixes and a corresponding failure to acknowledge both these in conceptual work on the subject and in policy practice. Existing frameworks do not adequately recognize the complexity of contemporary policy tool mixes, especially their hybrid and multilayered features, and how procedural and substantial tools operate and interact together in priority and supportive roles. To close this gap, we propose a revised tool framework that distinguishes between first and second-order aspects of instruments used in policy mixes and highlights the particular salience of procedural tools within them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信