5PSQ-130静脉氯化钾:用药过程安全吗?

F. Charbonneau, A. Desbuquois, A. Liebbe, M. Boisgontier
{"title":"5PSQ-130静脉氯化钾:用药过程安全吗?","authors":"F. Charbonneau, A. Desbuquois, A. Liebbe, M. Boisgontier","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Potassium chloride (KCl) for injection is identified as a high risk medicine and a ‘never events’. The development of quality assurance strategies for the KCl use process is essential to minimise risk. Aim and objectives To assess compliance with guidelines for KCl prescription, pharmaceutical evaluation and administration for KCl use to identify priorities for improvement. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted including patients treated with intravenous KCl (outside the intensive care unit) over 4 non-consecutive days from February to March 2020. The KCl use guidelines of the French National Agency for Medicines and Products Safety was considered as a reference. Data collected were: for the prescribing stage: indication, information that must appear on the prescription, concentration and flow rate; for the pharmaceutical evaluation stage: entry of pharmaceutical intervention (PI) for a non-compliant prescription; and for the administration stage: labelling, administered concentration and flow rate. Data were collected from the electronic medical records and the observation of KCl administration. Results During the study period, 34 patients (53% men) were included, with a median age of 76 years (range 26–94). The KCl use process was compliant for 6% (2/34). The prescribing stage was non-compliant (NC) for 88% (30/34): 76% (26/34) with NC indication, 53% (18/34) with incomplete prescription and 12% (4/34) too concentrated. The pharmaceutical evaluation stage was NC for 83% (25/30): it was missing in 58% (15/26) of non-indication PI, 89% (16/18) of missed information PI and 75% (3/4) of NC concentration PI. The administration stage was NC for 68% (23/34): 53% (18/34) with incomplete labelling and 15% (5/34) too concentrated. The flow rate was 100% compliant. Conclusion and relevance This study highlights a lack of compliance with recommendations. Because of this audit, we have identified an action plan for improvement: raising awareness of KCl good practices among physicians, pharmacists and nurses; identification of high risk medicines by a specific logo on software; and setting up intravenous KCl prescription protocols and an automatic reassessment request after 2 days. For pharmacists, it will be necessary to set up a simulation for pharmaceutical evaluation on fictional cases. For nurses, the labelling rules should be recalled. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5PSQ-130 Intravenous potassium chloride: is the medication use process secure?\",\"authors\":\"F. Charbonneau, A. Desbuquois, A. Liebbe, M. Boisgontier\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance Potassium chloride (KCl) for injection is identified as a high risk medicine and a ‘never events’. The development of quality assurance strategies for the KCl use process is essential to minimise risk. Aim and objectives To assess compliance with guidelines for KCl prescription, pharmaceutical evaluation and administration for KCl use to identify priorities for improvement. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted including patients treated with intravenous KCl (outside the intensive care unit) over 4 non-consecutive days from February to March 2020. The KCl use guidelines of the French National Agency for Medicines and Products Safety was considered as a reference. Data collected were: for the prescribing stage: indication, information that must appear on the prescription, concentration and flow rate; for the pharmaceutical evaluation stage: entry of pharmaceutical intervention (PI) for a non-compliant prescription; and for the administration stage: labelling, administered concentration and flow rate. Data were collected from the electronic medical records and the observation of KCl administration. Results During the study period, 34 patients (53% men) were included, with a median age of 76 years (range 26–94). The KCl use process was compliant for 6% (2/34). The prescribing stage was non-compliant (NC) for 88% (30/34): 76% (26/34) with NC indication, 53% (18/34) with incomplete prescription and 12% (4/34) too concentrated. The pharmaceutical evaluation stage was NC for 83% (25/30): it was missing in 58% (15/26) of non-indication PI, 89% (16/18) of missed information PI and 75% (3/4) of NC concentration PI. The administration stage was NC for 68% (23/34): 53% (18/34) with incomplete labelling and 15% (5/34) too concentrated. The flow rate was 100% compliant. Conclusion and relevance This study highlights a lack of compliance with recommendations. Because of this audit, we have identified an action plan for improvement: raising awareness of KCl good practices among physicians, pharmacists and nurses; identification of high risk medicines by a specific logo on software; and setting up intravenous KCl prescription protocols and an automatic reassessment request after 2 days. For pharmacists, it will be necessary to set up a simulation for pharmaceutical evaluation on fictional cases. For nurses, the labelling rules should be recalled. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和重要性注射用氯化钾(KCl)被确定为一种高风险药物和“永不发生的事件”。为KCl的使用过程制定质量保证策略对于最小化风险至关重要。目的和目标评估氯化钾处方、药品评价和氯化钾使用管理指南的遵守情况,以确定改进的重点。材料与方法前瞻性观察研究于2020年2月至3月对静脉注射氯化钾(非重症监护病房)治疗4天的患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。法国国家药品和产品安全局的KCl使用指南被认为是一种参考。收集的数据有:处方阶段:指征、处方上必须出现的信息、浓度和流速;药物评价阶段:对不合规处方进行药物干预(PI);在给药阶段:标记,给药浓度和流速。数据来源于电子病历和KCl给药情况的观察。结果在研究期间,纳入34例患者(53%为男性),中位年龄76岁(26-94岁)。KCl使用过程合规率为6%(2/34)。处方阶段不符合(NC)占88% (30/34),NC指征占76%(26/34),处方不完全占53%(18/34),过于浓缩占12%(4/34)。83%(25/30)的药物评价阶段为NC, 58%(15/26)的非适应症PI、89%(16/18)的遗漏信息PI和75%(3/4)的NC浓度PI为缺失阶段。给药阶段为NC(68%(23/34): 53%(18/34)),标记不完整,15%(5/34)过于集中。流量100%合规。结论和相关性本研究突出了缺乏对建议的遵从性。由于这次审核,我们确定了一项改进行动计划:提高医生、药剂师和护士对KCl良好做法的认识;通过软件上的特定标识识别高风险药品;建立静脉氯化钾处方方案和2天后自动重新评估请求。对于药师来说,有必要建立一个虚构病例的药物评价模拟。对于护士,标签规则应该被召回。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
5PSQ-130 Intravenous potassium chloride: is the medication use process secure?
Background and importance Potassium chloride (KCl) for injection is identified as a high risk medicine and a ‘never events’. The development of quality assurance strategies for the KCl use process is essential to minimise risk. Aim and objectives To assess compliance with guidelines for KCl prescription, pharmaceutical evaluation and administration for KCl use to identify priorities for improvement. Material and methods A prospective observational study was conducted including patients treated with intravenous KCl (outside the intensive care unit) over 4 non-consecutive days from February to March 2020. The KCl use guidelines of the French National Agency for Medicines and Products Safety was considered as a reference. Data collected were: for the prescribing stage: indication, information that must appear on the prescription, concentration and flow rate; for the pharmaceutical evaluation stage: entry of pharmaceutical intervention (PI) for a non-compliant prescription; and for the administration stage: labelling, administered concentration and flow rate. Data were collected from the electronic medical records and the observation of KCl administration. Results During the study period, 34 patients (53% men) were included, with a median age of 76 years (range 26–94). The KCl use process was compliant for 6% (2/34). The prescribing stage was non-compliant (NC) for 88% (30/34): 76% (26/34) with NC indication, 53% (18/34) with incomplete prescription and 12% (4/34) too concentrated. The pharmaceutical evaluation stage was NC for 83% (25/30): it was missing in 58% (15/26) of non-indication PI, 89% (16/18) of missed information PI and 75% (3/4) of NC concentration PI. The administration stage was NC for 68% (23/34): 53% (18/34) with incomplete labelling and 15% (5/34) too concentrated. The flow rate was 100% compliant. Conclusion and relevance This study highlights a lack of compliance with recommendations. Because of this audit, we have identified an action plan for improvement: raising awareness of KCl good practices among physicians, pharmacists and nurses; identification of high risk medicines by a specific logo on software; and setting up intravenous KCl prescription protocols and an automatic reassessment request after 2 days. For pharmacists, it will be necessary to set up a simulation for pharmaceutical evaluation on fictional cases. For nurses, the labelling rules should be recalled. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信