A. Satanova, D. Kaidarova, E. Kukubassov, O. Bertleuov, D. Kaldybekov, R. Bolatbekova
{"title":"阴道全切除术治疗复发性妇科肿瘤:一系列临床病例","authors":"A. Satanova, D. Kaidarova, E. Kukubassov, O. Bertleuov, D. Kaldybekov, R. Bolatbekova","doi":"10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-49-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Treating vaginal recurrence of gynecological cancer remains a complex clinical problem. Surgery is an effective and relatively \nsafe strategy for these cases. Vaginectomy is a method of surgical treatment of gynecological cancer local recurrence. Although vaginectomy is \nconsidered an effective treatment for a vaginal recurrence of cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancers, only a few published reports of vaginal \nresections have been found. In most cases, vaginal resections were performed by vaginal and/or/or open access. Several reports on laparoscopic \nvaginal resection for recurrence in gynecological cancer were found. \nThe aim was to study the effectiveness of vaginectomy in recurrent gynecological cancer. \nMethods: Clinical cases of seven patients after vaginectomy were analyzed. \nResults: The patients age ranged from 42 to 62 years (median 53 years). The duration of the operation varied from 240 to 480 minutes (median \n317 min), the volume of blood loss – from 90 to 220 ml (median 140 ml), and resection margins were negative in all cases. An ureteral catheter was \ninstalled in 2 cases. The Foley catheter was removed after 10 days on average (from 1 to 11 days). The patients stayed in the hospital for 7-14 days \n(median – 7 days). No intraoperative complications were registered. All patients after vaginectomy are alive. \nConclusion: Vaginal recurrence is the most common local recurrence in gynecological cancer, and there is no consensus regarding its treatment tactics. Although this article is somewhat limited in the number of patients, our results show the efficacy of vaginectomy in recurrent vaginal \ngynecological cancer","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TOTAL VAGINECTOMY FOR RECURRENT GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER: \\nA SERIES OF CLINICAL CASES\",\"authors\":\"A. Satanova, D. Kaidarova, E. Kukubassov, O. Bertleuov, D. Kaldybekov, R. Bolatbekova\",\"doi\":\"10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-49-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance: Treating vaginal recurrence of gynecological cancer remains a complex clinical problem. Surgery is an effective and relatively \\nsafe strategy for these cases. Vaginectomy is a method of surgical treatment of gynecological cancer local recurrence. Although vaginectomy is \\nconsidered an effective treatment for a vaginal recurrence of cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancers, only a few published reports of vaginal \\nresections have been found. In most cases, vaginal resections were performed by vaginal and/or/or open access. Several reports on laparoscopic \\nvaginal resection for recurrence in gynecological cancer were found. \\nThe aim was to study the effectiveness of vaginectomy in recurrent gynecological cancer. \\nMethods: Clinical cases of seven patients after vaginectomy were analyzed. \\nResults: The patients age ranged from 42 to 62 years (median 53 years). The duration of the operation varied from 240 to 480 minutes (median \\n317 min), the volume of blood loss – from 90 to 220 ml (median 140 ml), and resection margins were negative in all cases. An ureteral catheter was \\ninstalled in 2 cases. The Foley catheter was removed after 10 days on average (from 1 to 11 days). The patients stayed in the hospital for 7-14 days \\n(median – 7 days). No intraoperative complications were registered. All patients after vaginectomy are alive. \\nConclusion: Vaginal recurrence is the most common local recurrence in gynecological cancer, and there is no consensus regarding its treatment tactics. Although this article is somewhat limited in the number of patients, our results show the efficacy of vaginectomy in recurrent vaginal \\ngynecological cancer\",\"PeriodicalId\":19480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-49-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2022-2-64-49-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
TOTAL VAGINECTOMY FOR RECURRENT GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER:
A SERIES OF CLINICAL CASES
Relevance: Treating vaginal recurrence of gynecological cancer remains a complex clinical problem. Surgery is an effective and relatively
safe strategy for these cases. Vaginectomy is a method of surgical treatment of gynecological cancer local recurrence. Although vaginectomy is
considered an effective treatment for a vaginal recurrence of cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancers, only a few published reports of vaginal
resections have been found. In most cases, vaginal resections were performed by vaginal and/or/or open access. Several reports on laparoscopic
vaginal resection for recurrence in gynecological cancer were found.
The aim was to study the effectiveness of vaginectomy in recurrent gynecological cancer.
Methods: Clinical cases of seven patients after vaginectomy were analyzed.
Results: The patients age ranged from 42 to 62 years (median 53 years). The duration of the operation varied from 240 to 480 minutes (median
317 min), the volume of blood loss – from 90 to 220 ml (median 140 ml), and resection margins were negative in all cases. An ureteral catheter was
installed in 2 cases. The Foley catheter was removed after 10 days on average (from 1 to 11 days). The patients stayed in the hospital for 7-14 days
(median – 7 days). No intraoperative complications were registered. All patients after vaginectomy are alive.
Conclusion: Vaginal recurrence is the most common local recurrence in gynecological cancer, and there is no consensus regarding its treatment tactics. Although this article is somewhat limited in the number of patients, our results show the efficacy of vaginectomy in recurrent vaginal
gynecological cancer