{"title":"关于未定义值的类型化函数程序解释算法的不可比性","authors":"D. Grigoryan","doi":"10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper the interpretation algorithms of typed functional programs are considered. The interpretation algorithm is based on substitution, $ \\beta $-reduction and canonical $ \\delta $-reduction. It is shown that seven known interpretation algorithms (FS (of full substitution), PES (of parallel external substitution), LES (of left external substitution), PIS (of parallel inner substitution), LIS (of left inner substitution), ACT (active algorithm), PAS (passive algorithm)) are pairwise incomparable with respect to undefined value ($ \\perp $-incomparable).","PeriodicalId":21146,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ON INCOMPARABILITY OF INTERPRETATION ALGORITHMS OF TYPED FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMS WITH RESPECT TO UNDEFINED VALUE\",\"authors\":\"D. Grigoryan\",\"doi\":\"10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper the interpretation algorithms of typed functional programs are considered. The interpretation algorithm is based on substitution, $ \\\\beta $-reduction and canonical $ \\\\delta $-reduction. It is shown that seven known interpretation algorithms (FS (of full substitution), PES (of parallel external substitution), LES (of left external substitution), PIS (of parallel inner substitution), LIS (of left inner substitution), ACT (active algorithm), PAS (passive algorithm)) are pairwise incomparable with respect to undefined value ($ \\\\perp $-incomparable).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the YSU A: Physical and Mathematical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46991/pysu:a/2018.52.2.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ON INCOMPARABILITY OF INTERPRETATION ALGORITHMS OF TYPED FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMS WITH RESPECT TO UNDEFINED VALUE
In the paper the interpretation algorithms of typed functional programs are considered. The interpretation algorithm is based on substitution, $ \beta $-reduction and canonical $ \delta $-reduction. It is shown that seven known interpretation algorithms (FS (of full substitution), PES (of parallel external substitution), LES (of left external substitution), PIS (of parallel inner substitution), LIS (of left inner substitution), ACT (active algorithm), PAS (passive algorithm)) are pairwise incomparable with respect to undefined value ($ \perp $-incomparable).