宽恕与公众信任

L. Meyer
{"title":"宽恕与公众信任","authors":"L. Meyer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.235477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The currently received wisdom is that forgiveness is appropriate only in personal settings, between victims and wrongdoers, and that forgiveness is not only inappropriate in the public realm but usurps victims' rights and creates inequalities. This article denies these propositions and argues that community members can and ought to forgive wrongdoers, even if the victims do not. Forgiveness means risking a continuing relationship, and that is the aspect of forgiveness that must be public, not private. Nor does forgiveness undermine justice, if punishment is properly understood. Crime is a breaking of trust and an attempt to humiliate and degrade a victim. To give a criminal her due would be to humiliate and degrade the criminal and to break her trust. Yet even the most hard-nosed retributivists acknowledge that punishment must temper the crime in its rebound on the criminal. That temperance recognizes the communal ties to the criminal and is a form of forgiveness.","PeriodicalId":83028,"journal":{"name":"The Fordham urban law journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"1515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forgiveness and Public Trust\",\"authors\":\"L. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.235477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The currently received wisdom is that forgiveness is appropriate only in personal settings, between victims and wrongdoers, and that forgiveness is not only inappropriate in the public realm but usurps victims' rights and creates inequalities. This article denies these propositions and argues that community members can and ought to forgive wrongdoers, even if the victims do not. Forgiveness means risking a continuing relationship, and that is the aspect of forgiveness that must be public, not private. Nor does forgiveness undermine justice, if punishment is properly understood. Crime is a breaking of trust and an attempt to humiliate and degrade a victim. To give a criminal her due would be to humiliate and degrade the criminal and to break her trust. Yet even the most hard-nosed retributivists acknowledge that punishment must temper the crime in its rebound on the criminal. That temperance recognizes the communal ties to the criminal and is a form of forgiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"1515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Fordham urban law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.235477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fordham urban law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.235477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目前公认的观点是,宽恕只适用于个人场合,适用于受害者和犯错者之间;宽恕不仅不适用于公共场合,还会侵占受害者的权利,造成不平等。这篇文章否认了这些主张,并认为社区成员可以而且应该原谅犯错的人,即使受害者不这样做。宽恕意味着要冒险维持一段持续的关系,这是宽恕的一个方面,必须是公开的,而不是私下的。如果惩罚得到正确的理解,宽恕也不会破坏正义。犯罪是对信任的破坏,是试图羞辱和贬低受害者。给予罪犯应有的待遇,将会羞辱和贬低罪犯,并破坏她的信任。然而,即使是最顽固的报复主义者也承认,惩罚必须在对罪犯的反作用中缓和犯罪。这种节制承认了与罪犯的公共关系,是一种宽恕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forgiveness and Public Trust
The currently received wisdom is that forgiveness is appropriate only in personal settings, between victims and wrongdoers, and that forgiveness is not only inappropriate in the public realm but usurps victims' rights and creates inequalities. This article denies these propositions and argues that community members can and ought to forgive wrongdoers, even if the victims do not. Forgiveness means risking a continuing relationship, and that is the aspect of forgiveness that must be public, not private. Nor does forgiveness undermine justice, if punishment is properly understood. Crime is a breaking of trust and an attempt to humiliate and degrade a victim. To give a criminal her due would be to humiliate and degrade the criminal and to break her trust. Yet even the most hard-nosed retributivists acknowledge that punishment must temper the crime in its rebound on the criminal. That temperance recognizes the communal ties to the criminal and is a form of forgiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信