分组密码ITUbee的自相似密码分析

H. Soleimany
{"title":"分组密码ITUbee的自相似密码分析","authors":"H. Soleimany","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in the resource constrained devices have led to a renewed interest in designing light-weight primitives with inventive and unconventional structures. Using round-dependent constants instead of a strong key schedule is one of the most widely used trick against the self-similarity cryptanalysis in recent cipher proposals. So far there has been little discussion about the effect of the round constants on the security of the ciphers. In this study, the authors identify several weaknesses in round-reduced versions of the block cipher ITUbee, which was presented recently at LightSec 2013. These weaknesses allow to build relations between the round constants. The author's technique leads to several cryptanalysis in the weak-key, related-key and single-key models and shows that the resistance of ITUbee against self-similarity cryptanalysis is not independent of the values of round constants. They show that the round-reduced cipher under a fraction of the keys is distinguishable from an ideal random permutation. Then they utilise a similar technique to show there exists a deterministic related-key differential distinguisher for up to eight rounds of the cipher. This observation leads to the decrease of the security of 8-round ITUbee in the single-key model by one bit.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":"32 1","pages":"179-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-similarity cryptanalysis of the block cipher ITUbee\",\"authors\":\"H. Soleimany\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent developments in the resource constrained devices have led to a renewed interest in designing light-weight primitives with inventive and unconventional structures. Using round-dependent constants instead of a strong key schedule is one of the most widely used trick against the self-similarity cryptanalysis in recent cipher proposals. So far there has been little discussion about the effect of the round constants on the security of the ciphers. In this study, the authors identify several weaknesses in round-reduced versions of the block cipher ITUbee, which was presented recently at LightSec 2013. These weaknesses allow to build relations between the round constants. The author's technique leads to several cryptanalysis in the weak-key, related-key and single-key models and shows that the resistance of ITUbee against self-similarity cryptanalysis is not independent of the values of round constants. They show that the round-reduced cipher under a fraction of the keys is distinguishable from an ideal random permutation. Then they utilise a similar technique to show there exists a deterministic related-key differential distinguisher for up to eight rounds of the cipher. This observation leads to the decrease of the security of 8-round ITUbee in the single-key model by one bit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"179-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2014.0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

资源受限设备的最新发展使人们对设计具有创造性和非常规结构的轻量级原语重新产生了兴趣。在最近的密码方案中,使用轮相关常数代替强密钥调度是针对自相似密码分析使用最广泛的一种技巧。到目前为止,很少有人讨论圆形常数对密码安全性的影响。在这项研究中,作者发现了最近在LightSec 2013上展示的分组密码ITUbee的round-reduced版本的几个弱点。这些弱点允许在圆形常数之间建立关系。作者的技术导致了弱密钥、关联密钥和单键模型中的几种密码分析,并表明ITUbee对自相似密码分析的抵抗力并非与圆形常数的值无关。他们证明了在一小部分密钥下的圆形简化密码与理想随机排列是有区别的。然后,他们利用类似的技术来证明存在一个确定性的相关密钥差异区分器,最多可用于8轮密码。这一观察结果导致单钥模型下8轮ITUbee的安全性降低了1位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-similarity cryptanalysis of the block cipher ITUbee
Recent developments in the resource constrained devices have led to a renewed interest in designing light-weight primitives with inventive and unconventional structures. Using round-dependent constants instead of a strong key schedule is one of the most widely used trick against the self-similarity cryptanalysis in recent cipher proposals. So far there has been little discussion about the effect of the round constants on the security of the ciphers. In this study, the authors identify several weaknesses in round-reduced versions of the block cipher ITUbee, which was presented recently at LightSec 2013. These weaknesses allow to build relations between the round constants. The author's technique leads to several cryptanalysis in the weak-key, related-key and single-key models and shows that the resistance of ITUbee against self-similarity cryptanalysis is not independent of the values of round constants. They show that the round-reduced cipher under a fraction of the keys is distinguishable from an ideal random permutation. Then they utilise a similar technique to show there exists a deterministic related-key differential distinguisher for up to eight rounds of the cipher. This observation leads to the decrease of the security of 8-round ITUbee in the single-key model by one bit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信