衡量南非公共部门发展方案的政策指标一致性和连贯性

Q2 Social Sciences
F. Cloete
{"title":"衡量南非公共部门发展方案的政策指标一致性和连贯性","authors":"F. Cloete","doi":"10.4102/AEJ.V6I2.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The South African (SA) government has over time developed separate policy indicator frameworks to measure governmental programme performances. They include a series of national development indicators to measure long-term societal transformation impacts, medium-term strategic framework indicators to measure the implementation of the National Development Plan, indicators to measure progress towards achieving the government’s 14 strategic programme outcomes and a separate set of environmental indicators. However, serious doubts exist about the efficiency of implementation management efforts to achieve optimal coherence among these frameworks to maximise the best good policy governance outcomes and make it possible to measure South Africa’s compliance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Programme. Objectives : The aim of the study was to review the coherence of implementation management of these different competing systems to maximise good governance outcomes in South Africa, and to propose strategies for improvement. Method : The above indicator sets are summarised and critically assessed against the need to align them also with the envisaged SDG indicators. Results : The contents and management of the current SA policy indicators can and should be significantly improved. Conclusion : A more flexible and responsive integrated SA indicator set needs to be developed to comply better with the emerging international SDG system. This necessitates a longer term strategic approach to the SA system than the current short-term tactical approach.","PeriodicalId":37531,"journal":{"name":"African Evaluation Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy indicator consistency and coherence in measuring public sector development programmes in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"F. Cloete\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/AEJ.V6I2.338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : The South African (SA) government has over time developed separate policy indicator frameworks to measure governmental programme performances. They include a series of national development indicators to measure long-term societal transformation impacts, medium-term strategic framework indicators to measure the implementation of the National Development Plan, indicators to measure progress towards achieving the government’s 14 strategic programme outcomes and a separate set of environmental indicators. However, serious doubts exist about the efficiency of implementation management efforts to achieve optimal coherence among these frameworks to maximise the best good policy governance outcomes and make it possible to measure South Africa’s compliance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Programme. Objectives : The aim of the study was to review the coherence of implementation management of these different competing systems to maximise good governance outcomes in South Africa, and to propose strategies for improvement. Method : The above indicator sets are summarised and critically assessed against the need to align them also with the envisaged SDG indicators. Results : The contents and management of the current SA policy indicators can and should be significantly improved. Conclusion : A more flexible and responsive integrated SA indicator set needs to be developed to comply better with the emerging international SDG system. This necessitates a longer term strategic approach to the SA system than the current short-term tactical approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Evaluation Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Evaluation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/AEJ.V6I2.338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Evaluation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/AEJ.V6I2.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:随着时间的推移,南非(SA)政府制定了单独的政策指标框架来衡量政府项目的绩效。它们包括一系列衡量长期社会转型影响的国家发展指标,衡量国家发展计划执行情况的中期战略框架指标,衡量实现政府14项战略方案成果进展的指标,以及一套单独的环境指标。然而,在这些框架之间实现最佳一致性,以最大限度地提高最佳政策治理成果,并使南非有可能衡量其对联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)计划的遵守情况,对实施管理工作的效率存在严重怀疑。目的:本研究的目的是审查这些不同竞争系统的实施管理的一致性,以最大限度地提高南非的良好治理成果,并提出改进策略。方法:对上述指标集进行总结和严格评估,以确保它们也与设想的可持续发展目标指标保持一致。结果:现行SA政策指标的内容和管理可以而且应该得到显著改善。结论:需要制定一套更灵活、反应更快的综合可持续发展指标,以更好地符合新兴的国际可持续发展目标体系。这就需要对SA系统采取一种较长期的战略方针,而不是目前的短期战术方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy indicator consistency and coherence in measuring public sector development programmes in South Africa
Background : The South African (SA) government has over time developed separate policy indicator frameworks to measure governmental programme performances. They include a series of national development indicators to measure long-term societal transformation impacts, medium-term strategic framework indicators to measure the implementation of the National Development Plan, indicators to measure progress towards achieving the government’s 14 strategic programme outcomes and a separate set of environmental indicators. However, serious doubts exist about the efficiency of implementation management efforts to achieve optimal coherence among these frameworks to maximise the best good policy governance outcomes and make it possible to measure South Africa’s compliance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Programme. Objectives : The aim of the study was to review the coherence of implementation management of these different competing systems to maximise good governance outcomes in South Africa, and to propose strategies for improvement. Method : The above indicator sets are summarised and critically assessed against the need to align them also with the envisaged SDG indicators. Results : The contents and management of the current SA policy indicators can and should be significantly improved. Conclusion : A more flexible and responsive integrated SA indicator set needs to be developed to comply better with the emerging international SDG system. This necessitates a longer term strategic approach to the SA system than the current short-term tactical approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Evaluation Journal
African Evaluation Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles merit on any subject related to evaluation, and provide targeted information of professional interest to members of AfrEA and its national associations. Aims of the African Evaluation Journal (AEJ): -AEJ aims to be a high-quality, peer-reviewed journal that builds evaluation-related knowledge and practice in support of effective developmental policies on the African continent. -AEJ aims to provide a communication platform for scholars and practitioners of evaluation to share and debate ideas about evaluation theory and practice in Africa. -AEJ aims to promote cross-fertilisation of ideas and methodologies between countries and between evaluation scholars and practitioners in the developed and developing world. -AEJ aims to promote evaluation scholarship and authorship, and a culture of peer-review in the African evaluation community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信