回到马可福音16章8节:有什么新鲜事吗?

IF 0.2 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.2143/ETL.95.4.3286928

C. Clivaz

{"title":"回到马可福音16章8节:有什么新鲜事吗?","authors":"C. Clivaz","doi":"10.2143/ETL.95.4.3286928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article in OA on Peeters website. The present article offers a first presentation of a five-year research project on Mark 16 financed by the SNSF. It first surveys the variety in recent scholarly opinions on the end of Mark’s gospel after several decades of nearly unanimous agreement that Mk 16,8 constituted the original ending. The possibility to look online at digital manuscripts increases the NT scholars’ aware-ness of the three witnesses that present the end of Mark’s gospel in verse 8: 01, 03 and 304. Secondly, the article discusses the most recent hypothesis on Mk 16,8 by Stephen Hultgren. Starting from the assumption that there may be a link between Dan 10,7 and Mark 16,8, Hultgren draws attention to the widespread motif of having fear in front of a divine epiphany. Finally, the article paves the way for further inquiries in order to take into account the diversity of early Chris-tian readings in Mark 16.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"1 1","pages":"645-659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Returning to Mark 16, 8: What's new?\",\"authors\":\"C. Clivaz\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ETL.95.4.3286928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article in OA on Peeters website. The present article offers a first presentation of a five-year research project on Mark 16 financed by the SNSF. It first surveys the variety in recent scholarly opinions on the end of Mark’s gospel after several decades of nearly unanimous agreement that Mk 16,8 constituted the original ending. The possibility to look online at digital manuscripts increases the NT scholars’ aware-ness of the three witnesses that present the end of Mark’s gospel in verse 8: 01, 03 and 304. Secondly, the article discusses the most recent hypothesis on Mk 16,8 by Stephen Hultgren. Starting from the assumption that there may be a link between Dan 10,7 and Mark 16,8, Hultgren draws attention to the widespread motif of having fear in front of a divine epiphany. Finally, the article paves the way for further inquiries in order to take into account the diversity of early Chris-tian readings in Mark 16.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"645-659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.95.4.3286928\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.95.4.3286928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文章发表在彼得斯网站的OA上。本文首次介绍了由国家科学基金会资助的一个为期五年的马克16研究项目。它首先调查了最近学术界对马可福音结局的各种看法，几十年来，几乎一致认为马可福音16章8节是最初的结局。在线查看数字手稿的可能性增加了新约学者对马可福音8:01,03和304结尾的三位见证人的认识。其次，本文讨论了Stephen Hultgren关于Mk 16,8的最新假设。从《但以理书》第10,7章和《马可福音》第16,8章之间可能存在联系的假设出发，Hultgren将注意力吸引到普遍存在的主题上，即在神圣的顿见面前感到恐惧。最后，这篇文章为进一步的研究铺平了道路，以便考虑到马可福音16章早期基督教解读的多样性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Returning to Mark 16, 8: What's new?

Article in OA on Peeters website. The present article offers a first presentation of a five-year research project on Mark 16 financed by the SNSF. It first surveys the variety in recent scholarly opinions on the end of Mark’s gospel after several decades of nearly unanimous agreement that Mk 16,8 constituted the original ending. The possibility to look online at digital manuscripts increases the NT scholars’ aware-ness of the three witnesses that present the end of Mark’s gospel in verse 8: 01, 03 and 304. Secondly, the article discusses the most recent hypothesis on Mk 16,8 by Stephen Hultgren. Starting from the assumption that there may be a link between Dan 10,7 and Mark 16,8, Hultgren draws attention to the widespread motif of having fear in front of a divine epiphany. Finally, the article paves the way for further inquiries in order to take into account the diversity of early Chris-tian readings in Mark 16.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.