地面医务人员开胸手术的匹配队列研究

Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins
{"title":"地面医务人员开胸手术的匹配队列研究","authors":"Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins","doi":"10.56068/qmbv3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment.  Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. \nMethods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. \nResults: A total of 14 POT patients were identified.  Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). \nConclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matched Cohort Study of Open Thoracostomies Performed by Ground Medics\",\"authors\":\"Alison A Smith, A. Ciaraglia, Benjamin Axtman, CJ Winckler, D. Wampler, Maxwell A. Braverman, C. P. Shahan, Rachelle Babbitt Jonas, Michael Shiels, B. Eastridge, Ronald M Stewart, Susannah E. Nicholson, Donald J. Jenkins\",\"doi\":\"10.56068/qmbv3502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment.  Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. \\nMethods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. \\nResults: A total of 14 POT patients were identified.  Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). \\nConclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56068/qmbv3502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/qmbv3502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸外伤引起的紧张性气胸是一种迅速致命的疾病,需要及时治疗。院前开胸术(POT)是一种潜在的挽救生命的干预措施,可以在现场进行治疗张力性气胸。然而,由地面EMS提供者实施的POT的结果尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较由地面EMS服务提供者进行POT治疗的胸外伤患者与未在现场进行POT治疗的匹配队列患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析2017-2020年在一级创伤中心连续就诊的胸部创伤成人患者的病历。结果与未接受POT的患者队列进行比较,这些患者与损伤严重程度和院前CPR相匹配。结果:共鉴定出14例POT患者。大多数POT为双侧(n=11/14, 78.6%),所有患者(n=14/14)均发生院前心脏骤停。穿透性损伤2例(14.3%)恢复自发循环。与对照组相比,总EMS时间和现场EMS时间均无差异(p>0.05)。结论:本研究表明,地面EMS可以在不增加严重创伤患者院前时间的情况下进行开胸手术,并且可以实现更高的ROSC。需要更大的、前瞻性的、多机构的分析来进一步评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Matched Cohort Study of Open Thoracostomies Performed by Ground Medics
Background: Tension pneumothorax resulting from chest trauma is a rapidly fatal condition that requires prompt treatment.  Prehospital open thoracostomy (POT) is a potentially lifesaving intervention that can be performed in the field to treat tension pneumothorax. However, the results from POT performed by ground EMS providers have not been well-studied. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with chest trauma who underwent POT performed by ground EMS providers with a matched cohort who did not undergo this procedure in the field. Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive adult patients presenting to a Level I trauma center with chest trauma were analyzed from 2017-2020. Outcomes were compared to a patient cohort who did not undergo POT matched by severity of injury and prehospital CPR. Results: A total of 14 POT patients were identified.  Majority of POT were bilateral (n=11/14, 78.6%) and all of these patients (n=14/14) had prehospital cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in 2 patients with penetrating injuries (14.3%). There was no difference in total and scene EMS time compared to the matched cohort without POT (p>0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that open thoracostomies could be performed by ground EMS units without increasing prehospital time for severely injured trauma patients and greater achievement of ROSC. Larger, prospective, multi-institutional analyses are needed to further evaluate outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信