{"title":"阿拉伯裔美国人大学护理教育的理论与实践差距","authors":"Raj’a Nayef Zyoud","doi":"10.46328/ijres.3086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory-practice gap in nursing education confuses students and decreases the quality of their training. This study aims to examine the gap between theoretical teaching and clinical training for students at AAUP. A cross-sectional survey of 192 nursing students at AAUP. Questions measuring aspects of the theory-practice gap were developed based on the literature review. Socio-demographic variables included sex, age, residence, and school year. Simple frequencies and multivariate linear regression were used to analyze the data. The p-value was set at 0.05 for statistical significance. The practical trainer was the most important factor in bridging students’ theory-practice gap. Practical trainers who explain to the students the theoretical protocols of the nursing procedures produced students with better abilities to link theory and practice (B = 1.53, P = 0.000). The university teacher was less important in the theory-practice link. The simulation training was significantly related to students’ abilities to link practice with theory (B = 0.28, P = 0.036). Investing in nursing clinical practice and supporting the clinical instructors is recommended. Communication between the university teachers and the practical instructors can improve their training skills and their abilities to link theory with practice.","PeriodicalId":43178,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education-IJCRSEE","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory-Practice Gap in Nursing Education at Arab American University\",\"authors\":\"Raj’a Nayef Zyoud\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/ijres.3086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory-practice gap in nursing education confuses students and decreases the quality of their training. This study aims to examine the gap between theoretical teaching and clinical training for students at AAUP. A cross-sectional survey of 192 nursing students at AAUP. Questions measuring aspects of the theory-practice gap were developed based on the literature review. Socio-demographic variables included sex, age, residence, and school year. Simple frequencies and multivariate linear regression were used to analyze the data. The p-value was set at 0.05 for statistical significance. The practical trainer was the most important factor in bridging students’ theory-practice gap. Practical trainers who explain to the students the theoretical protocols of the nursing procedures produced students with better abilities to link theory and practice (B = 1.53, P = 0.000). The university teacher was less important in the theory-practice link. The simulation training was significantly related to students’ abilities to link practice with theory (B = 0.28, P = 0.036). Investing in nursing clinical practice and supporting the clinical instructors is recommended. Communication between the university teachers and the practical instructors can improve their training skills and their abilities to link theory with practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education-IJCRSEE\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education-IJCRSEE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education-IJCRSEE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
护理教育中理论与实践的脱节使学生困惑,降低了培训质量。本研究旨在探讨美国医学科学院学生的理论教学与临床训练之间的差距。对美国大学护理学院192名护理专业学生的横断面调查。在文献综述的基础上,提出了测量理论与实践差距方面的问题。社会人口变量包括性别、年龄、居住地和学年。采用简单频率和多元线性回归对数据进行分析。p值设为0.05,具有统计学意义。实践培训师是弥合学生理论与实践差距的最重要因素。实习培训师向学生讲解护理程序的理论协议,使学生有更好的理论与实践联系的能力(B = 1.53, P = 0.000)。大学教师在理论与实践的联系中不那么重要。模拟训练与学生理论联系实际的能力显著相关(B = 0.28, P = 0.036)。建议投资于护理临床实践并支持临床讲师。高校教师与实践指导员之间的交流可以提高他们的培训技能和理论联系实际的能力。
Theory-Practice Gap in Nursing Education at Arab American University
The theory-practice gap in nursing education confuses students and decreases the quality of their training. This study aims to examine the gap between theoretical teaching and clinical training for students at AAUP. A cross-sectional survey of 192 nursing students at AAUP. Questions measuring aspects of the theory-practice gap were developed based on the literature review. Socio-demographic variables included sex, age, residence, and school year. Simple frequencies and multivariate linear regression were used to analyze the data. The p-value was set at 0.05 for statistical significance. The practical trainer was the most important factor in bridging students’ theory-practice gap. Practical trainers who explain to the students the theoretical protocols of the nursing procedures produced students with better abilities to link theory and practice (B = 1.53, P = 0.000). The university teacher was less important in the theory-practice link. The simulation training was significantly related to students’ abilities to link practice with theory (B = 0.28, P = 0.036). Investing in nursing clinical practice and supporting the clinical instructors is recommended. Communication between the university teachers and the practical instructors can improve their training skills and their abilities to link theory with practice.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE) is an international, high quality, peer reviewed open access journal which publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, perception, natural language understanding, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, connectionism, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern related in education, pedagogy and psychology. All articles are published in English and undergo a peer-review process. The scope of IJCRSEE is focused on cognitive research both in topics covered as well as disciplinary perspective: -Cognitive Research in Education -Cognitive Pedagogics -Cognitive Psychology -Psycholinguistics -Cognitive Linguistics -Cognitive Culture Studies -Cognitive Neurophysiology -Cognitive Aspects: Sport Culture -Cognitive Aspects: Methodology of Knowledge -Text Processing and Cognitive Technologies -Curriculum Development -Development of Learning Environment -Education Administration -Educational Psychology -Educational Technology -Elementary Education -Innovative Pedagogical Models -Learning Systems Platforms -Media Education -Science Education -Teaching and Learning Technologies The main objective of the Journal is to discuss global prospects and innovations concerning major issues of cognitive science, to publish new scientific results of cognitive science research, including the studies of cognitive processes, emotions, perception, memory, thinking, problem solving, planning, education and teaching, language and consciousness study, the results of studying man’s cognitive development and the formation of basic cognitive skills in everyday life. The Journal seeks to stimulate the initiation of new research and ideas in cognitive science for the purpose of integration and interaction of international specialists in the development of cognitive science as interdisciplinary knowledge.