Brugada综合征无症状患者是否应该植入心律转复除颤器?

N. Brankovic, N. Radovanovic, B. Kircanski, S. Pavlovic, N. Vujadinovic, V. Sajic, A. Milasinovic, V. Bisenić, M. Živković, G. Milasinovic
{"title":"Brugada综合征无症状患者是否应该植入心律转复除颤器?","authors":"N. Brankovic, N. Radovanovic, B. Kircanski, S. Pavlovic, N. Vujadinovic, V. Sajic, A. Milasinovic, V. Bisenić, M. Živković, G. Milasinovic","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Implantable cardiverter defibrillators (ICD) represent the only effective treatment in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, according to current ESC Guidelines, ICD implantation is recommended only in secondary prevention, while it should be considered in patients with a spontaneous diagnostic type I ECG pattern and history of syncope.\n \n \n \n We aimed to determine the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during the long-term follow-up among patients with BrS and ICDs implanted in primary or secondary prevention.\n \n \n \n This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary center among adult patients with BrS that underwent single or dual chamber ICD implantation from January 2008 to December 2017. The study group was devided into subgroups depending on weather the patients at the time of ICD implantation had documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) regardless of the ECG type of BrS (group I), had BrS type I and history of syncope (group II) or had BrS type I and were asymptomatic but assessed as in high risk of SCD due to non-sustained VT episodes, younger age or history of SCD in close family members (group III). We used patients medical records for collecting the data about VT and VF episodes during the follow-up period.\n \n \n \n In the course of ten-year period, ICDs were implanted in 21 adult patients with BrS (66.7% were male). Mean age at the ICD implantation time was 40.3 ± 14.9 years. We analyzed 8 patients from group I, 7 patients from group II, and 6 patients from group III. Mean follow-up period was 82.5 ± 33.3 months. During the obsereved period, VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected in 7 patients from group I (87.5%), in 3 patients from group II (42.86%) and in one patient from group III (16.67%). Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias among at least one pair of observed groups (p = 0.031). Using Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis we found statistically significant difference between the patients with malignant arrhythmias and asymptomatic patients (p = 0.03), but not between the other pairs.\n \n \n \n Although asymptomatic patients with BrS are at significantly lower risk of SCD, it is important to identify high-risk patients in the low-risk group. Therefore, creating a tool for calculating the risk of SCD among these patients might be helpfull in everyday clinical practice.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should we implant cardioverter defibrillators in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome?\",\"authors\":\"N. Brankovic, N. Radovanovic, B. Kircanski, S. Pavlovic, N. Vujadinovic, V. Sajic, A. Milasinovic, V. Bisenić, M. Živković, G. Milasinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euac053.385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Type of funding sources: None.\\n \\n \\n \\n Implantable cardiverter defibrillators (ICD) represent the only effective treatment in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, according to current ESC Guidelines, ICD implantation is recommended only in secondary prevention, while it should be considered in patients with a spontaneous diagnostic type I ECG pattern and history of syncope.\\n \\n \\n \\n We aimed to determine the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during the long-term follow-up among patients with BrS and ICDs implanted in primary or secondary prevention.\\n \\n \\n \\n This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary center among adult patients with BrS that underwent single or dual chamber ICD implantation from January 2008 to December 2017. The study group was devided into subgroups depending on weather the patients at the time of ICD implantation had documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) regardless of the ECG type of BrS (group I), had BrS type I and history of syncope (group II) or had BrS type I and were asymptomatic but assessed as in high risk of SCD due to non-sustained VT episodes, younger age or history of SCD in close family members (group III). We used patients medical records for collecting the data about VT and VF episodes during the follow-up period.\\n \\n \\n \\n In the course of ten-year period, ICDs were implanted in 21 adult patients with BrS (66.7% were male). Mean age at the ICD implantation time was 40.3 ± 14.9 years. We analyzed 8 patients from group I, 7 patients from group II, and 6 patients from group III. Mean follow-up period was 82.5 ± 33.3 months. During the obsereved period, VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected in 7 patients from group I (87.5%), in 3 patients from group II (42.86%) and in one patient from group III (16.67%). Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias among at least one pair of observed groups (p = 0.031). Using Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis we found statistically significant difference between the patients with malignant arrhythmias and asymptomatic patients (p = 0.03), but not between the other pairs.\\n \\n \\n \\n Although asymptomatic patients with BrS are at significantly lower risk of SCD, it is important to identify high-risk patients in the low-risk group. Therefore, creating a tool for calculating the risk of SCD among these patients might be helpfull in everyday clinical practice.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资金来源类型:无。植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)是预防Brugada综合征(BrS)患者心源性猝死(SCD)的唯一有效治疗方法。然而,根据目前的ESC指南,ICD植入仅推荐用于二级预防,而对于自发诊断的I型心电图模式和晕厥病史的患者应考虑ICD植入。我们的目的是确定在初级或二级预防中植入BrS和icd的患者的长期随访期间室性心动过速的频率。本回顾性观察性研究于2008年1月至2017年12月在三级中心对接受单室或双室ICD植入的成年BrS患者进行。根据ICD植入时患者是否有记录的持续性室性心动过速(VT)或室性颤动(VF),而不考虑BrS的ECG类型(I组),是否有BrS I型和晕厥史(II组),是否有BrS I型且无症状,但由于非持续性VT发作而被评估为SCD的高风险,研究组被分为亚组。年龄较小或近亲有SCD病史(III组)。我们使用患者的医疗记录来收集随访期间室性心动过速和室性心动过速发作的数据。在10年的时间里,21例成人BrS患者植入了icd,其中男性占66.7%。ICD植入时的平均年龄为40.3±14.9岁。我们分析了I组8例,II组7例,III组6例。平均随访时间82.5±33.3个月。在观察期间,I组7例(87.5%)、II组3例(42.86%)和III组1例(16.67%)适当检测到VT/VF发作。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,至少有一对观察组的室性心动过速发生率有统计学差异(p = 0.031)。通过Dunn-Bonferroni事后分析,我们发现恶性心律失常患者与无症状患者之间存在统计学差异(p = 0.03),但其他两组之间无统计学差异。虽然无症状BrS患者发生SCD的风险明显较低,但在低风险组中识别高危患者是很重要的。因此,创建一种工具来计算SCD在这些患者中的风险可能有助于日常临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should we implant cardioverter defibrillators in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome?
Type of funding sources: None. Implantable cardiverter defibrillators (ICD) represent the only effective treatment in prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, according to current ESC Guidelines, ICD implantation is recommended only in secondary prevention, while it should be considered in patients with a spontaneous diagnostic type I ECG pattern and history of syncope. We aimed to determine the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during the long-term follow-up among patients with BrS and ICDs implanted in primary or secondary prevention. This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a tertiary center among adult patients with BrS that underwent single or dual chamber ICD implantation from January 2008 to December 2017. The study group was devided into subgroups depending on weather the patients at the time of ICD implantation had documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) regardless of the ECG type of BrS (group I), had BrS type I and history of syncope (group II) or had BrS type I and were asymptomatic but assessed as in high risk of SCD due to non-sustained VT episodes, younger age or history of SCD in close family members (group III). We used patients medical records for collecting the data about VT and VF episodes during the follow-up period. In the course of ten-year period, ICDs were implanted in 21 adult patients with BrS (66.7% were male). Mean age at the ICD implantation time was 40.3 ± 14.9 years. We analyzed 8 patients from group I, 7 patients from group II, and 6 patients from group III. Mean follow-up period was 82.5 ± 33.3 months. During the obsereved period, VT/VF episodes were appropriately detected in 7 patients from group I (87.5%), in 3 patients from group II (42.86%) and in one patient from group III (16.67%). Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias among at least one pair of observed groups (p = 0.031). Using Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis we found statistically significant difference between the patients with malignant arrhythmias and asymptomatic patients (p = 0.03), but not between the other pairs. Although asymptomatic patients with BrS are at significantly lower risk of SCD, it is important to identify high-risk patients in the low-risk group. Therefore, creating a tool for calculating the risk of SCD among these patients might be helpfull in everyday clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信