{"title":"我对Michael Power的《审计协会》一书对我的审计研究和兴趣的重要性的自我反思","authors":"Peter Skaerbaek","doi":"10.1108/qram-11-2021-0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the implications that Power’s book had to the author’s research in public sector auditing.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this paper, the author reflects and debates the inspiration that Michael Power’s book The Audit Society had on the author’s own research.\n\n\nFindings\nThe author finds that this book had a significant influence on how he succeeded theorizing his studies on auditing, and how he could contribute to the audit literature. It is stunning how the book succeeded in synthesizing audit research, encouraging scholars to understand auditing as a social practice, i.e. how auditing can be theorized using various social science theories and how the book also appealed to broader social science.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper is a reflection that covers around a 20-year period with potential mis-representations of how exactly sequences of actions and thoughts were.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper helps to clarify how it is that audit operates and influences everyday life of persons involved with auditing.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper casts doubts as to what actions are carried out in the name of audit and that audit is not just a value free activity but involved with political agendas.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this paper is that it fleshes out how a seminal book can have significant implications on how research is carried out.\n","PeriodicalId":46537,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"My self-reflection on the importance of Michael Power’s book The Audit Society to my research and interest in auditing\",\"authors\":\"Peter Skaerbaek\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qram-11-2021-0198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the implications that Power’s book had to the author’s research in public sector auditing.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this paper, the author reflects and debates the inspiration that Michael Power’s book The Audit Society had on the author’s own research.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe author finds that this book had a significant influence on how he succeeded theorizing his studies on auditing, and how he could contribute to the audit literature. It is stunning how the book succeeded in synthesizing audit research, encouraging scholars to understand auditing as a social practice, i.e. how auditing can be theorized using various social science theories and how the book also appealed to broader social science.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis paper is a reflection that covers around a 20-year period with potential mis-representations of how exactly sequences of actions and thoughts were.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper helps to clarify how it is that audit operates and influences everyday life of persons involved with auditing.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper casts doubts as to what actions are carried out in the name of audit and that audit is not just a value free activity but involved with political agendas.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe originality of this paper is that it fleshes out how a seminal book can have significant implications on how research is carried out.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-11-2021-0198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qram-11-2021-0198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
My self-reflection on the importance of Michael Power’s book The Audit Society to my research and interest in auditing
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications that Power’s book had to the author’s research in public sector auditing.
Design/methodology/approach
In this paper, the author reflects and debates the inspiration that Michael Power’s book The Audit Society had on the author’s own research.
Findings
The author finds that this book had a significant influence on how he succeeded theorizing his studies on auditing, and how he could contribute to the audit literature. It is stunning how the book succeeded in synthesizing audit research, encouraging scholars to understand auditing as a social practice, i.e. how auditing can be theorized using various social science theories and how the book also appealed to broader social science.
Research limitations/implications
This paper is a reflection that covers around a 20-year period with potential mis-representations of how exactly sequences of actions and thoughts were.
Practical implications
This paper helps to clarify how it is that audit operates and influences everyday life of persons involved with auditing.
Social implications
This paper casts doubts as to what actions are carried out in the name of audit and that audit is not just a value free activity but involved with political agendas.
Originality/value
The originality of this paper is that it fleshes out how a seminal book can have significant implications on how research is carried out.
期刊介绍:
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management is an international journal that promotes qualitative research at the interface of accounting and management. The journal encourages the assessment of practices in the accounting field through a variety of theoretical lenses, and seeks to further our knowledge of the accounting-management nexus in its broadest (e.g., organisational, social and political) contexts. QRAM welcomes submissions of original research papers, conceptual pieces, substantive review articles, and shorter papers such as comments or research notes. The following is intended to indicate potential topics, but is by no means prescriptive. These topics can be overlapping rather than discrete subject areas, and researchers should not feel restricted by the scope of the topics listed below. • Management accounting and control • Accountability, transition and organisational change • Performance management and accounting metrics • Accounting for strategic management • The use and behavioural effects of accounting information in organisational decision-making • Public and third sector accounting and management • Accounting and management controls for sustainability and the environment • Historical perspectives on the accounting-management interface • Methods and methodologies for research at the interface of accounting and management • Accounting and management in developing countries and emerging economies • Technology effects on accounting-management dynamics