雪莱的偏移

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
M. Callaghan
{"title":"雪莱的偏移","authors":"M. Callaghan","doi":"10.1353/SEL.2020.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article considers Percy Bysshe Shelley’s response to William Wordsworth’s The Excursion, viewing the younger poet as responding to the challenge of Wordsworth’s epic throughout his career. Focusing specifically on Laon and Cythna, Prometheus Unbound, and The Triumph of Life, this article shows Shelley’s one-sided debate with Wordsworth as pitting his poetics against Wordsworth’s poetics, Shelleyan philosophy against Wordsworthian thought. The Excursion was not a poem for Shelley to reject. It was the epic that would tease Shelley into complex thought. Shelley’s troubled though profound response to Wordsworth’s poem sees Shelley make The Excursion his own.","PeriodicalId":45835,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shelley’s Excursion\",\"authors\":\"M. Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/SEL.2020.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article considers Percy Bysshe Shelley’s response to William Wordsworth’s The Excursion, viewing the younger poet as responding to the challenge of Wordsworth’s epic throughout his career. Focusing specifically on Laon and Cythna, Prometheus Unbound, and The Triumph of Life, this article shows Shelley’s one-sided debate with Wordsworth as pitting his poetics against Wordsworth’s poetics, Shelleyan philosophy against Wordsworthian thought. The Excursion was not a poem for Shelley to reject. It was the epic that would tease Shelley into complex thought. Shelley’s troubled though profound response to Wordsworth’s poem sees Shelley make The Excursion his own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/SEL.2020.0029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SEL.2020.0029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了雪莱对华兹华斯史诗《漫游》的回应,认为这位年轻的诗人一生都在回应华兹华斯史诗的挑战。本文以《拉翁与西特纳》、《未受束缚的普罗米修斯》和《生命的胜利》为重点,揭示了雪莱与华兹华斯的诗学之争、雪莱哲学与华兹华斯思想之争。《远足》是一首雪莱不能拒绝的诗。正是这部史诗使雪莱陷入了复杂的思考。雪莱对华兹华斯的诗做出了困惑而深刻的回应,这让雪莱把《远足》变成了自己的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shelley’s Excursion
Abstract:This article considers Percy Bysshe Shelley’s response to William Wordsworth’s The Excursion, viewing the younger poet as responding to the challenge of Wordsworth’s epic throughout his career. Focusing specifically on Laon and Cythna, Prometheus Unbound, and The Triumph of Life, this article shows Shelley’s one-sided debate with Wordsworth as pitting his poetics against Wordsworth’s poetics, Shelleyan philosophy against Wordsworthian thought. The Excursion was not a poem for Shelley to reject. It was the epic that would tease Shelley into complex thought. Shelley’s troubled though profound response to Wordsworth’s poem sees Shelley make The Excursion his own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: SEL focuses on four fields of British literature in rotating, quarterly issues: English Renaissance, Tudor and Stuart Drama, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, and Nineteenth Century. The editors select learned, readable papers that contribute significantly to the understanding of British literature from 1500 to 1900. SEL is well known for thecommissioned omnibus review of recent studies in the field that is included in each issue. In a single volume, readers might find an argument for attributing a previously unknown work to Shakespeare or de-attributing a famous work from Milton, a study ofthe connections between class and genre in the Restoration Theater.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信