肯尼亚养老金计划的系统风险和投资组合绩效

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Karen Kandie, Joseph Macheru, C. Osoro
{"title":"肯尼亚养老金计划的系统风险和投资组合绩效","authors":"Karen Kandie, Joseph Macheru, C. Osoro","doi":"10.47604/ijfa.2080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Life expectancy in Kenya has increased from 61 to 67 years, while the fertility rate has declined from 4.4 to 3.4 children from 2010 to 2020, implying an increasing number of pensioners at risk of old age poverty if they do not have sufficient pension. The study's general objective was to investigate the effect of systematic risk on the investment portfolio performance of pension schemes in Kenya. The specific objectives were to evaluate the relationship between interest rates, stock market index, inflation rate and economic growth as independent variables and the investment portfolio performance as the dependent variable. The study examined the moderating effect of asset allocation to various asset classes on the relationship between systematic risk and investment portfolio performance of pension schemes. \nMethodology: The study applied Panel data Regression and Maclleland two-step model. It used a census of secondary data on 1,172 pension schemes registered with Retirement Benefits Authority from 2015 to 2021. \nFindings: The R-Squared was 0.5451, meaning systematic risk variables simultaneously explained the investment portfolio performance by 54.51%. All the coefficients for the independent variables were significant at 5% level of significance. The Chi-Square test statistic showed that the moderating effect of asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities and immovable properties were not significant at 5% level of significance. Finally, the moderating effect of allocation to guaranteed funds was significant at 10% level of significance. The systematic risk variables are strong predictors of the performance of pension Schemes. Asset allocation to guaranteed funds is a strong moderator. Asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities, and immovable property are insignificant moderators. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study integrated Capital Assets Portfolio Theory, Arbitrage Theory, and Efficient Market Theory with Modern Portfolio Theory to add to existing literature, particularly in emerging markets. Policymakers should consider the effect on pension performance when setting policy rates, inflation targets and asset allocation limits. Pension practitioners should consider allocation to different assets portfolio construction to diversify risk. ","PeriodicalId":53549,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Risk and Investment Portfolio Performance of Pension Schemes in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Karen Kandie, Joseph Macheru, C. Osoro\",\"doi\":\"10.47604/ijfa.2080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Life expectancy in Kenya has increased from 61 to 67 years, while the fertility rate has declined from 4.4 to 3.4 children from 2010 to 2020, implying an increasing number of pensioners at risk of old age poverty if they do not have sufficient pension. The study's general objective was to investigate the effect of systematic risk on the investment portfolio performance of pension schemes in Kenya. The specific objectives were to evaluate the relationship between interest rates, stock market index, inflation rate and economic growth as independent variables and the investment portfolio performance as the dependent variable. The study examined the moderating effect of asset allocation to various asset classes on the relationship between systematic risk and investment portfolio performance of pension schemes. \\nMethodology: The study applied Panel data Regression and Maclleland two-step model. It used a census of secondary data on 1,172 pension schemes registered with Retirement Benefits Authority from 2015 to 2021. \\nFindings: The R-Squared was 0.5451, meaning systematic risk variables simultaneously explained the investment portfolio performance by 54.51%. All the coefficients for the independent variables were significant at 5% level of significance. The Chi-Square test statistic showed that the moderating effect of asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities and immovable properties were not significant at 5% level of significance. Finally, the moderating effect of allocation to guaranteed funds was significant at 10% level of significance. The systematic risk variables are strong predictors of the performance of pension Schemes. Asset allocation to guaranteed funds is a strong moderator. Asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities, and immovable property are insignificant moderators. \\nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study integrated Capital Assets Portfolio Theory, Arbitrage Theory, and Efficient Market Theory with Modern Portfolio Theory to add to existing literature, particularly in emerging markets. Policymakers should consider the effect on pension performance when setting policy rates, inflation targets and asset allocation limits. Pension practitioners should consider allocation to different assets portfolio construction to diversify risk. \",\"PeriodicalId\":53549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijfa.2080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijfa.2080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:肯尼亚的预期寿命从61岁增加到67岁,而生育率从2010年的4.4个孩子下降到2020年的3.4个孩子,这意味着如果没有足够的养老金,越来越多的养老金领取者面临老年贫困的风险。这项研究的总体目标是调查肯尼亚养恤金计划的系统性风险对投资组合业绩的影响。具体目标是评价利率、股票市场指数、通货膨胀率和经济增长作为自变量和投资组合绩效作为因变量之间的关系。本研究考察了不同资产类别的资产配置对养老金计划系统风险与投资组合绩效之间关系的调节作用。方法:采用面板数据回归和Maclleland两步模型。它使用了对2015年至2021年在退休福利管理局注册的1172个养老金计划的二次数据普查。研究发现:r平方为0.5451,即系统风险变量同时解释投资组合绩效的比例为54.51%。自变量的所有系数均在5%显著水平上显著。卡方检验统计量显示,资产配置对国库券、股票和不动产的调节作用在5%显著水平下不显著。最后,在10%的显著水平上,保证资金配置的调节效应显著。系统风险变量是养老金计划绩效的有力预测指标。向担保基金配置资产是一个强有力的调节因素。资产配置为国库券、债券、股票和不动产是不显著的调节因子。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:该研究将资本资产投资组合理论、套利理论和有效市场理论与现代投资组合理论相结合,以补充现有文献,特别是在新兴市场。政策制定者在设定政策利率、通胀目标和资产配置限制时,应考虑对养老金绩效的影响。养老金从业人员应考虑配置不同的资产组合结构,分散风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Risk and Investment Portfolio Performance of Pension Schemes in Kenya
Purpose: Life expectancy in Kenya has increased from 61 to 67 years, while the fertility rate has declined from 4.4 to 3.4 children from 2010 to 2020, implying an increasing number of pensioners at risk of old age poverty if they do not have sufficient pension. The study's general objective was to investigate the effect of systematic risk on the investment portfolio performance of pension schemes in Kenya. The specific objectives were to evaluate the relationship between interest rates, stock market index, inflation rate and economic growth as independent variables and the investment portfolio performance as the dependent variable. The study examined the moderating effect of asset allocation to various asset classes on the relationship between systematic risk and investment portfolio performance of pension schemes. Methodology: The study applied Panel data Regression and Maclleland two-step model. It used a census of secondary data on 1,172 pension schemes registered with Retirement Benefits Authority from 2015 to 2021. Findings: The R-Squared was 0.5451, meaning systematic risk variables simultaneously explained the investment portfolio performance by 54.51%. All the coefficients for the independent variables were significant at 5% level of significance. The Chi-Square test statistic showed that the moderating effect of asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities and immovable properties were not significant at 5% level of significance. Finally, the moderating effect of allocation to guaranteed funds was significant at 10% level of significance. The systematic risk variables are strong predictors of the performance of pension Schemes. Asset allocation to guaranteed funds is a strong moderator. Asset allocation to Treasury Bills and Bonds quoted equities, and immovable property are insignificant moderators. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study integrated Capital Assets Portfolio Theory, Arbitrage Theory, and Efficient Market Theory with Modern Portfolio Theory to add to existing literature, particularly in emerging markets. Policymakers should consider the effect on pension performance when setting policy rates, inflation targets and asset allocation limits. Pension practitioners should consider allocation to different assets portfolio construction to diversify risk. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance
International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信