M. Augustyn, E. Silver, N. Blum, P. High, N. Roizen, R. Stein
{"title":"DBPNet站点的DBP评估:种族/民族是护理的重要因素吗?","authors":"M. Augustyn, E. Silver, N. Blum, P. High, N. Roizen, R. Stein","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To examine whether there are differences between non-Hispanic white (NHW) and nonwhite (NW) children in referral questions, evaluations, and diagnoses during developmental behavioral pediatrician (DBP) evaluations at academic medical centers and the potential role of socioeconomic factors in any disparities noted. DESIGN/METHODS This observational study used survey data from 56 DBPs at 12 sites participating in DBPNet. Child race and ethnicity were obtained from DBP report. Mixed-model logistic and linear regression analyses controlling for site, provider, and socioeconomic proxy variables (insurance type, parent education, and language spoken at home) were used to compare groups on referral concerns, evaluation procedures, and diagnoses. RESULTS Among the patients evaluated, 349 were NHW, 406 were NW (187 Hispanic, 135 black, 58 Asian/Pacific Islander, and 26 other/mixed), and 29 were missing race/ethnicity data. The mean waiting time controlling for site and provider was 20.4 weeks for NHW children and 20.5 weeks for NW children. Reasons for referral were similar in the NWH and NW groups, with only sleep problem concerns being more frequent among NHW children (9.2% vs 3.4% NW, p = 0.01). Patients also had similar evaluations in the 2 groups; the only differences found were that more NHW than NW children had genetic testing (33.1% vs 19.3%, p = 0.02), ophthalmology evaluations (8.7% vs 3.4%, p = 0.03), and psychopharmacologic evaluations (19.1% vs 9.7%, p = 0.008). Numbers and types of diagnoses did not vary by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION This study suggests little inequality between NHW and NW children in wait time to care, reasons for referral, workup, or final diagnosis for initial DBP evaluation at these 12 academic DBP centers when socioeconomic factors are considered. Nevertheless, because differences in these related factors may be mechanisms through which racial/ethnic disparities can arise, it will be important to consider them in planning models and care protocols for underserved communities.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DBP Evaluations in DBPNet Sites: Is Race/Ethnicity a Significant Factor in Care?\",\"authors\":\"M. Augustyn, E. Silver, N. Blum, P. High, N. Roizen, R. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE To examine whether there are differences between non-Hispanic white (NHW) and nonwhite (NW) children in referral questions, evaluations, and diagnoses during developmental behavioral pediatrician (DBP) evaluations at academic medical centers and the potential role of socioeconomic factors in any disparities noted. DESIGN/METHODS This observational study used survey data from 56 DBPs at 12 sites participating in DBPNet. Child race and ethnicity were obtained from DBP report. Mixed-model logistic and linear regression analyses controlling for site, provider, and socioeconomic proxy variables (insurance type, parent education, and language spoken at home) were used to compare groups on referral concerns, evaluation procedures, and diagnoses. RESULTS Among the patients evaluated, 349 were NHW, 406 were NW (187 Hispanic, 135 black, 58 Asian/Pacific Islander, and 26 other/mixed), and 29 were missing race/ethnicity data. The mean waiting time controlling for site and provider was 20.4 weeks for NHW children and 20.5 weeks for NW children. Reasons for referral were similar in the NWH and NW groups, with only sleep problem concerns being more frequent among NHW children (9.2% vs 3.4% NW, p = 0.01). Patients also had similar evaluations in the 2 groups; the only differences found were that more NHW than NW children had genetic testing (33.1% vs 19.3%, p = 0.02), ophthalmology evaluations (8.7% vs 3.4%, p = 0.03), and psychopharmacologic evaluations (19.1% vs 9.7%, p = 0.008). Numbers and types of diagnoses did not vary by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION This study suggests little inequality between NHW and NW children in wait time to care, reasons for referral, workup, or final diagnosis for initial DBP evaluation at these 12 academic DBP centers when socioeconomic factors are considered. Nevertheless, because differences in these related factors may be mechanisms through which racial/ethnic disparities can arise, it will be important to consider them in planning models and care protocols for underserved communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的探讨非西班牙裔白人(NHW)和非白人(NW)儿童在学术医疗中心发展行为儿科医生(DBP)评估中的转诊问题、评估和诊断是否存在差异,以及社会经济因素在任何差异中所起的潜在作用。设计/方法本观察性研究使用了参与DBPNet的12个站点的56个dbp的调查数据。儿童种族和民族来自DBP报告。混合模型logistic和线性回归分析控制了地点、提供者和社会经济代理变量(保险类型、父母教育和家庭语言),用于比较两组在转诊关注、评估程序和诊断方面的差异。结果在评估的患者中,349例NHW, 406例NW(187例西班牙裔,135例黑人,58例亚洲/太平洋岛民,26例其他/混合),29例缺少种族/族裔数据。控制地点和提供者的平均等待时间NHW儿童为20.4周,NW儿童为20.5周。NWH组和NW组的转诊原因相似,只有睡眠问题在NW组儿童中更常见(9.2% vs 3.4% NW, p = 0.01)。两组患者的评价也相似;唯一的差异是NHW儿童比NW儿童有更多的基因检测(33.1%比19.3%,p = 0.02)、眼科评估(8.7%比3.4%,p = 0.03)和精神药理学评估(19.1%比9.7%,p = 0.008)。诊断的数量和类型没有因种族/民族而异。结论本研究表明,当考虑到社会经济因素时,在12个DBP学术中心,NHW和NW儿童在等待护理时间、转诊原因、随访或初始DBP评估的最终诊断方面几乎没有不平等。然而,由于这些相关因素的差异可能是产生种族/民族差异的机制,因此在为服务不足的社区规划模式和护理协议时考虑这些因素将是重要的。
DBP Evaluations in DBPNet Sites: Is Race/Ethnicity a Significant Factor in Care?
OBJECTIVE To examine whether there are differences between non-Hispanic white (NHW) and nonwhite (NW) children in referral questions, evaluations, and diagnoses during developmental behavioral pediatrician (DBP) evaluations at academic medical centers and the potential role of socioeconomic factors in any disparities noted. DESIGN/METHODS This observational study used survey data from 56 DBPs at 12 sites participating in DBPNet. Child race and ethnicity were obtained from DBP report. Mixed-model logistic and linear regression analyses controlling for site, provider, and socioeconomic proxy variables (insurance type, parent education, and language spoken at home) were used to compare groups on referral concerns, evaluation procedures, and diagnoses. RESULTS Among the patients evaluated, 349 were NHW, 406 were NW (187 Hispanic, 135 black, 58 Asian/Pacific Islander, and 26 other/mixed), and 29 were missing race/ethnicity data. The mean waiting time controlling for site and provider was 20.4 weeks for NHW children and 20.5 weeks for NW children. Reasons for referral were similar in the NWH and NW groups, with only sleep problem concerns being more frequent among NHW children (9.2% vs 3.4% NW, p = 0.01). Patients also had similar evaluations in the 2 groups; the only differences found were that more NHW than NW children had genetic testing (33.1% vs 19.3%, p = 0.02), ophthalmology evaluations (8.7% vs 3.4%, p = 0.03), and psychopharmacologic evaluations (19.1% vs 9.7%, p = 0.008). Numbers and types of diagnoses did not vary by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION This study suggests little inequality between NHW and NW children in wait time to care, reasons for referral, workup, or final diagnosis for initial DBP evaluation at these 12 academic DBP centers when socioeconomic factors are considered. Nevertheless, because differences in these related factors may be mechanisms through which racial/ethnic disparities can arise, it will be important to consider them in planning models and care protocols for underserved communities.