杰弗里·温特斯的《寡头政治》一书中关于索伦和盛之间冲突的科学证据

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
N. Yunus
{"title":"杰弗里·温特斯的《寡头政治》一书中关于索伦和盛之间冲突的科学证据","authors":"N. Yunus","doi":"10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Winters’ book is a must-read for students of comparative democratizationand its focus on power and coercion is a helpful corrective to New InstitutionalEconomics. One of the central, and most discomforting claims, advanced byWinters is that oligarchy is perfectly compatible with democracy, an insight hetraces back to Aristotle. Civil oligarchies can be democratic, but need not be, asdemonstrated by the case of Singapore. This Asian city-state also serves toremind us about the tentative relationship between the rule of law anddemocracy. Singapore tamed both its oligarchs and its political oppositionthrough the courts","PeriodicalId":40374,"journal":{"name":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Evidence of a Clash between Das Sollen and Das Sein in the book Oligarchy by Jeffrey A Winters\",\"authors\":\"N. Yunus\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Winters’ book is a must-read for students of comparative democratizationand its focus on power and coercion is a helpful corrective to New InstitutionalEconomics. One of the central, and most discomforting claims, advanced byWinters is that oligarchy is perfectly compatible with democracy, an insight hetraces back to Aristotle. Civil oligarchies can be democratic, but need not be, asdemonstrated by the case of Singapore. This Asian city-state also serves toremind us about the tentative relationship between the rule of law anddemocracy. Singapore tamed both its oligarchs and its political oppositionthrough the courts\",\"PeriodicalId\":40374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i3.27657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

温特斯的书是学习比较民主化的学生必读的书,它对权力和强制的关注是对新制度经济学的有益纠正。温特斯提出的最核心、也是最令人不安的主张之一是,寡头政治与民主是完全相容的,他将这种见解追溯到亚里士多德。公民寡头政治可以是民主的,但不一定是民主的,新加坡的例子就证明了这一点。这个亚洲城邦也提醒我们,法治与民主之间的关系尚不明确。新加坡通过法院驯服了寡头和政治反对派
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific Evidence of a Clash between Das Sollen and Das Sein in the book Oligarchy by Jeffrey A Winters
Winters’ book is a must-read for students of comparative democratizationand its focus on power and coercion is a helpful corrective to New InstitutionalEconomics. One of the central, and most discomforting claims, advanced byWinters is that oligarchy is perfectly compatible with democracy, an insight hetraces back to Aristotle. Civil oligarchies can be democratic, but need not be, asdemonstrated by the case of Singapore. This Asian city-state also serves toremind us about the tentative relationship between the rule of law anddemocracy. Singapore tamed both its oligarchs and its political oppositionthrough the courts
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信