核盾牌背后的异见?:奥布宁斯克原子研究中心和苏联后期异见人士的基础设施

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Roman Khandozhko
{"title":"核盾牌背后的异见?:奥布宁斯克原子研究中心和苏联后期异见人士的基础设施","authors":"Roman Khandozhko","doi":"10.25162/JGO-2018-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protagonists of the atomic project often figure prominently in narratives about nonconformist movements in Soviet history. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the dynamic entanglement of nuclear history and the history of dissident networks in a place where they became particularly visible. Via the example of the atomic city of Obninsk, it shows how the independent social activism of the shestidesiatniki originated in the institutional and social infrastructure of Cold War nuclear science, and how their activity became an important substrate for political dissidence during and after the conservative turn of the late 1960s. In the early 1970s, dissident scientists such as Valentin Turchin and Zhores Medvedev could still rely on their local and international scientific networks to provide a certain level of protection against state persecution when disseminating their critical views. Despite their defeat at the hands of Party authorities in the 1960-70s, representatives of the local dissentient milieus again became an active group within the democratic movement during Perestroika. Drawing on a broad range of original sources, including biographical interviews, private archives and records stored in some of the most important archives of the Soviet dissident movement, this study provides a differentiated view on Obninsk’s “atomic intelligentsia”. Conceptualised as a social micro-analysis of networks established in a formerly closed nuclear city, it discusses the scientists’ activities in a world between technocratic pragmatism, faith in socialism and participation in the troublesome development of nonconformist circles.","PeriodicalId":54097,"journal":{"name":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","volume":"16 1","pages":"65-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissidence behind the Nuclear Shield?: The Obninsk Atomic Research Centre and the Infrastructure of Dissent in the Late Soviet Union\",\"authors\":\"Roman Khandozhko\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/JGO-2018-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protagonists of the atomic project often figure prominently in narratives about nonconformist movements in Soviet history. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the dynamic entanglement of nuclear history and the history of dissident networks in a place where they became particularly visible. Via the example of the atomic city of Obninsk, it shows how the independent social activism of the shestidesiatniki originated in the institutional and social infrastructure of Cold War nuclear science, and how their activity became an important substrate for political dissidence during and after the conservative turn of the late 1960s. In the early 1970s, dissident scientists such as Valentin Turchin and Zhores Medvedev could still rely on their local and international scientific networks to provide a certain level of protection against state persecution when disseminating their critical views. Despite their defeat at the hands of Party authorities in the 1960-70s, representatives of the local dissentient milieus again became an active group within the democratic movement during Perestroika. Drawing on a broad range of original sources, including biographical interviews, private archives and records stored in some of the most important archives of the Soviet dissident movement, this study provides a differentiated view on Obninsk’s “atomic intelligentsia”. Conceptualised as a social micro-analysis of networks established in a formerly closed nuclear city, it discusses the scientists’ activities in a world between technocratic pragmatism, faith in socialism and participation in the troublesome development of nonconformist circles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"65-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/JGO-2018-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAHRBUCHER FUR GESCHICHTE OSTEUROPAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/JGO-2018-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在关于苏联历史上不墨守成规的运动的叙述中,核项目的主角经常占据突出地位。本文深入分析了核历史和持不同政见者网络的动态纠缠,并在这些网络变得特别明显的地方进行了分析。通过原子之城奥布宁斯克的例子,它展示了shestidesiatniki的独立社会行动主义如何起源于冷战核科学的制度和社会基础设施,以及他们的活动如何在20世纪60年代末的保守转向期间和之后成为政治异议的重要基础。在20世纪70年代早期,持不同政见的科学家,如Valentin Turchin和Zhores Medvedev,在传播他们的批评观点时,仍然可以依靠他们的本地和国际科学网络来提供一定程度的保护,使其免受国家迫害。尽管他们在1960-70年代被共产党当局打败,但当地持不同政见者的代表在改革期间再次成为民主运动中的活跃团体。利用广泛的原始资料,包括传记采访、私人档案和保存在一些最重要的苏联持不同政见者运动档案中的记录,本研究对奥布宁斯克的“原子知识分子”提供了不同的观点。本书的概念是对一个以前封闭的核城市建立的社会网络进行社会微观分析,它讨论了科学家在技术官僚实用主义、对社会主义的信仰和参与不墨守成规圈子的麻烦发展之间的世界中的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissidence behind the Nuclear Shield?: The Obninsk Atomic Research Centre and the Infrastructure of Dissent in the Late Soviet Union
Protagonists of the atomic project often figure prominently in narratives about nonconformist movements in Soviet history. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the dynamic entanglement of nuclear history and the history of dissident networks in a place where they became particularly visible. Via the example of the atomic city of Obninsk, it shows how the independent social activism of the shestidesiatniki originated in the institutional and social infrastructure of Cold War nuclear science, and how their activity became an important substrate for political dissidence during and after the conservative turn of the late 1960s. In the early 1970s, dissident scientists such as Valentin Turchin and Zhores Medvedev could still rely on their local and international scientific networks to provide a certain level of protection against state persecution when disseminating their critical views. Despite their defeat at the hands of Party authorities in the 1960-70s, representatives of the local dissentient milieus again became an active group within the democratic movement during Perestroika. Drawing on a broad range of original sources, including biographical interviews, private archives and records stored in some of the most important archives of the Soviet dissident movement, this study provides a differentiated view on Obninsk’s “atomic intelligentsia”. Conceptualised as a social micro-analysis of networks established in a formerly closed nuclear city, it discusses the scientists’ activities in a world between technocratic pragmatism, faith in socialism and participation in the troublesome development of nonconformist circles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信