{"title":"Fisch保留动脉技术与显微外科腹股沟下精索静脉曲张切除术的比较","authors":"A. Elahwany","doi":"10.21608/HA.2018.6103.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim was to evaluate the reduction of operation time using a new artery-sparing varicocelectomy technique.Patients and methods: This study compares a new surgical technique introduced by Fisch and colleagues, which elevates the testicular artery and ligates the pampiniform plexus in one or more vein groups, with subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy. The study was conducted retrospectively on a control group of 51 patients who had conventional microsurgical varicocelectomy (group 1) and the experimental group of 44 patients who underwent the new technique (group 2).Results: We compared the outcome measures including operative time (in minutes), postoperative complications, semen percentage improvement, and pregnancy outcome rate. Both groups had significantly improved semen count, motility, and abnormal form improvements. Group 2 had significantly greater sperm motility and 11.6% less abnormal forms. Both groups had similar pregnancy rates (40% for the microsurgical group vs. 35.7% for the Fisch technique group; P=0.3). Group 1 had an average operating time of 94±6.9 min compared with 44.5±8.4 min for group 2 (P=0.001).Conclusion: The Fisch technique dramatically reduces operative time with similar patient outcomes when compared with the traditional subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy.","PeriodicalId":13018,"journal":{"name":"Human Andrology","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Fisch’s artery-sparing technique with the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy\",\"authors\":\"A. Elahwany\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/HA.2018.6103.1036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim was to evaluate the reduction of operation time using a new artery-sparing varicocelectomy technique.Patients and methods: This study compares a new surgical technique introduced by Fisch and colleagues, which elevates the testicular artery and ligates the pampiniform plexus in one or more vein groups, with subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy. The study was conducted retrospectively on a control group of 51 patients who had conventional microsurgical varicocelectomy (group 1) and the experimental group of 44 patients who underwent the new technique (group 2).Results: We compared the outcome measures including operative time (in minutes), postoperative complications, semen percentage improvement, and pregnancy outcome rate. Both groups had significantly improved semen count, motility, and abnormal form improvements. Group 2 had significantly greater sperm motility and 11.6% less abnormal forms. Both groups had similar pregnancy rates (40% for the microsurgical group vs. 35.7% for the Fisch technique group; P=0.3). Group 1 had an average operating time of 94±6.9 min compared with 44.5±8.4 min for group 2 (P=0.001).Conclusion: The Fisch technique dramatically reduces operative time with similar patient outcomes when compared with the traditional subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Andrology\",\"volume\":\"256 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/HA.2018.6103.1036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/HA.2018.6103.1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨保留动脉的精索静脉曲张切除术的手术时间。患者和方法:本研究比较了Fisch等人提出的一种新的手术技术,即提升睾丸动脉并结扎一个或多个静脉组的pampiniform丛,与腹股沟下显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术。回顾性研究了51例常规显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术的对照组(1组)和44例采用新技术的实验组(2组)。结果:我们比较了手术时间(以分钟为单位)、术后并发症、精液百分比改善和妊娠结局率。两组患者的精液数量、活力和异常形态均有显著改善。第二组精子活力显著增加,异常形态减少11.6%。两组的妊娠率相似(显微手术组为40%,Fisch技术组为35.7%;P = 0.3)。组1平均手术时间为94±6.9 min,组2平均手术时间为44.5±8.4 min (P=0.001)。结论:与传统的腹股沟下显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术相比,Fisch技术显著缩短了手术时间,患者预后相似。
Comparing Fisch’s artery-sparing technique with the microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the reduction of operation time using a new artery-sparing varicocelectomy technique.Patients and methods: This study compares a new surgical technique introduced by Fisch and colleagues, which elevates the testicular artery and ligates the pampiniform plexus in one or more vein groups, with subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy. The study was conducted retrospectively on a control group of 51 patients who had conventional microsurgical varicocelectomy (group 1) and the experimental group of 44 patients who underwent the new technique (group 2).Results: We compared the outcome measures including operative time (in minutes), postoperative complications, semen percentage improvement, and pregnancy outcome rate. Both groups had significantly improved semen count, motility, and abnormal form improvements. Group 2 had significantly greater sperm motility and 11.6% less abnormal forms. Both groups had similar pregnancy rates (40% for the microsurgical group vs. 35.7% for the Fisch technique group; P=0.3). Group 1 had an average operating time of 94±6.9 min compared with 44.5±8.4 min for group 2 (P=0.001).Conclusion: The Fisch technique dramatically reduces operative time with similar patient outcomes when compared with the traditional subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy.